Image Image Image Image

2016/17 College Prospects

Moderators: chitownsports4ever, emperorjones

patryk7754
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,317
And1: 485
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: 2016/17 College Prospects 

Post#261 » by patryk7754 » Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:50 pm

If both trubisky and Watson go in the first I think that gives us leverage against the patriots
User avatar
Mind_Odyssey
Senior
Posts: 611
And1: 687
Joined: Jan 28, 2017
       

Re: 2016/17 College Prospects 

Post#262 » by Mind_Odyssey » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:51 am

Don't be shocked if Chicago drafts Solomon Thomas over Johnathan Allen.
Image
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 11,988
And1: 1,334
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: 2016/17 College Prospects 

Post#263 » by Chi town » Wed Feb 15, 2017 4:26 am

Mind_Odyssey wrote:Don't be shocked if Chicago drafts Solomon Thomas over Johnathan Allen.


AS they should. Thomas is electric.
User avatar
CjayC
RealGM
Posts: 10,239
And1: 402
Joined: Mar 02, 2005
Location: Hoiball
   

Re: 2016/17 College Prospects 

Post#264 » by CjayC » Thu Feb 16, 2017 7:52 am

Mind_Odyssey wrote:Don't be shocked if Chicago drafts Solomon Thomas over Johnathan Allen.


I heard Bears like Thomas, Jamal Adams, Trubisky, and Kizer.

Thomas or Adams would be amazing. Not as sold on Kizer as those two, but wouldn't hate it. I don't think his flaws are unfixable and he does have the highest ceiling of all the QB's. Trubisky ehhh not sure. He did look great, and looks to have all the tools, but the sample size is definitely something to think about.
User avatar
Mind_Odyssey
Senior
Posts: 611
And1: 687
Joined: Jan 28, 2017
       

Re: 2016/17 College Prospects 

Post#265 » by Mind_Odyssey » Thu Feb 16, 2017 8:46 am

CjayC wrote:
Mind_Odyssey wrote:Don't be shocked if Chicago drafts Solomon Thomas over Johnathan Allen.


I heard Bears like Thomas, Jamal Adams, Trubisky, and Kizer.

Thomas or Adams would be amazing. Not as sold on Kizer as those two, but wouldn't hate it. I don't think his flaws are unfixable and he does have the highest ceiling of all the QB's. Trubisky ehhh not sure. He did look great, and looks to have all the tools, but the sample size is definitely something to think about.



You're right about all 4. The bears really like Trubiskys physical tools.
Image
User avatar
CjayC
RealGM
Posts: 10,239
And1: 402
Joined: Mar 02, 2005
Location: Hoiball
   

Re: 2016/17 College Prospects 

Post#266 » by CjayC » Thu Feb 16, 2017 9:07 am

Mind_Odyssey wrote:
CjayC wrote:
Mind_Odyssey wrote:Don't be shocked if Chicago drafts Solomon Thomas over Johnathan Allen.


I heard Bears like Thomas, Jamal Adams, Trubisky, and Kizer.

Thomas or Adams would be amazing. Not as sold on Kizer as those two, but wouldn't hate it. I don't think his flaws are unfixable and he does have the highest ceiling of all the QB's. Trubisky ehhh not sure. He did look great, and looks to have all the tools, but the sample size is definitely something to think about.



You're right about all 4. The bears really like Trubiskys physical tools.


You post on Football Future?
patryk7754
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,317
And1: 485
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: 2016/17 College Prospects 

Post#267 » by patryk7754 » Thu Feb 16, 2017 6:56 pm

Mind_Odyssey wrote:
CjayC wrote:
Mind_Odyssey wrote:Don't be shocked if Chicago drafts Solomon Thomas over Johnathan Allen.


I heard Bears like Thomas, Jamal Adams, Trubisky, and Kizer.

Thomas or Adams would be amazing. Not as sold on Kizer as those two, but wouldn't hate it. I don't think his flaws are unfixable and he does have the highest ceiling of all the QB's. Trubisky ehhh not sure. He did look great, and looks to have all the tools, but the sample size is definitely something to think about.



You're right about all 4. The bears really like Trubiskys physical tools.

Where are you guys getting this info?
patryk7754
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,317
And1: 485
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: 2016/17 College Prospects 

Post#268 » by patryk7754 » Thu Feb 16, 2017 7:09 pm



My first impression of him is disappointed. The way he's been hyped and in the video he's being single blocked. Just disappointed. No way anyone has him higher on their board than Allen.
patryk7754
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,317
And1: 485
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: 2016/17 College Prospects 

Post#269 » by patryk7754 » Thu Feb 16, 2017 7:10 pm



I will be very surprised if the bears take Thomas over this guy.
User avatar
Mind_Odyssey
Senior
Posts: 611
And1: 687
Joined: Jan 28, 2017
       

Re: 2016/17 College Prospects 

Post#270 » by Mind_Odyssey » Fri Feb 17, 2017 8:55 am

patryk7754 wrote:

My first impression of him is disappointed. The way he's been hyped and in the video he's being single blocked. Just disappointed. No way anyone has him higher on their board than Allen.


You're going to be really shocked draft night then.
Image
User avatar
Red Larrivee
RealGM
Posts: 36,543
And1: 11,328
Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Location: Hogging Microphone Time From Tom Dore

Re: 2016/17 College Prospects 

Post#271 » by Red Larrivee » Tue Feb 28, 2017 12:26 am

Mind_Odyssey wrote:Don't be shocked if Chicago drafts Solomon Thomas over Johnathan Allen.


I'm all for taking the best impact, defensive player available. This QB class stinks and Mike Mayock saying that he doesn't think there's a Day 1 starter in this class just furthers it. If somebody is still on board in the 2nd/3rd/4th, then I'm down, but using a #3 in a mediocre QB class is just asking for disappointment.
patryk7754
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,317
And1: 485
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: 2016/17 College Prospects 

Post#272 » by patryk7754 » Thu Mar 2, 2017 7:23 pm

Report: Browns' Jackson doesn't think 12th pick will secure top QB choice (via http://thesco.re/theScore_App )
http://www.thescore.com/news/1244168

Hue Jackson wants a good QB but doesn't think he'll be available at 12. Maybe this means the browns are willing to trade up.

Titans are probably the front runners for trade partners
City of Trees
RealGM
Posts: 10,776
And1: 2,077
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
   

Re: 2016/17 College Prospects 

Post#273 » by City of Trees » Thu Mar 2, 2017 11:03 pm

The QB lovefest has begun.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app
City of Trees
RealGM
Posts: 10,776
And1: 2,077
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
   

Re: 2016/17 College Prospects 

Post#274 » by City of Trees » Fri Mar 3, 2017 12:46 am

Lmao if Trubisky and Kizer go 1 and 2.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app
patryk7754
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,317
And1: 485
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: 2016/17 College Prospects 

Post#275 » by patryk7754 » Fri Mar 3, 2017 2:16 am

City of Trees wrote:Lmao if Trubisky and Kizer go 1 and 2.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app

I think Lynch is talking up Kizerbecause they want to trade out of the two spot.
patryk7754
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,317
And1: 485
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: 2016/17 College Prospects 

Post#276 » by patryk7754 » Fri Mar 3, 2017 5:00 am

Bears reportedly to pursue, Gilmore, Wagner, and Glennon: via cbssports
City of Trees
RealGM
Posts: 10,776
And1: 2,077
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
   

Re: RE: Re: 2016/17 College Prospects 

Post#277 » by City of Trees » Fri Mar 3, 2017 5:27 am

patryk7754 wrote:
City of Trees wrote:Lmao if Trubisky and Kizer go 1 and 2.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app

I think Lynch is talking up Kizerbecause they want to trade out of the two spot.

It's possible .... but, he also doesn't have a qb on the roster. He sounds like a guy who is wanting to fall in love with a qb at #2.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app
patryk7754
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,317
And1: 485
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: RE: Re: 2016/17 College Prospects 

Post#278 » by patryk7754 » Fri Mar 3, 2017 12:58 pm

City of Trees wrote:
patryk7754 wrote:
City of Trees wrote:Lmao if Trubisky and Kizer go 1 and 2.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app

I think Lynch is talking up Kizerbecause they want to trade out of the two spot.

It's possible .... but, he also doesn't have a qb on the roster. He sounds like a guy who is wanting to fall in love with a qb at #2.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app

I have a theory.

The jets just realeased Brandon Marshall. The 49ers have been interested in cutler and and Jeffery. All three will join forces in San Fran
Axxo
Starter
Posts: 2,487
And1: 400
Joined: Jun 28, 2016

Re: RE: Re: 2016/17 College Prospects 

Post#279 » by Axxo » Sat Mar 4, 2017 4:27 pm

CjayC wrote:
Mind_Odyssey wrote:Don't be shocked if Chicago drafts Solomon Thomas over Johnathan Allen.


I heard Bears like Thomas, Jamal Adams, Trubisky, and Kizer.

Thomas or Adams would be amazing. Not as sold on Kizer as those two, but wouldn't hate it. I don't think his flaws are unfixable and he does have the highest ceiling of all the QB's. Trubisky ehhh not sure. He did look great, and looks to have all the tools, but the sample size is definitely something to think about.

It was just reported they like Peterman at QB in the draft.

Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk
User avatar
Mind_Odyssey
Senior
Posts: 611
And1: 687
Joined: Jan 28, 2017
       

Re: 2016/17 College Prospects 

Post#280 » by Mind_Odyssey » Sat Mar 4, 2017 4:28 pm

City of Trees wrote:Lmao if Trubisky and Kizer go 1 and 2.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app



Mary Kay is the worst reporter Cleveland has. Anything she says is fake news.
Image

Return to Chicago Bears