RealGM

Bears | Team interested in Smiley
Mon, 21 May 2007 13:26:00 -0700

Matt Maiocco, of the Santa Rosa Press Democrat, reports the Chicago Bears have called the San Francisco 49ers about possibly trading for 49ers OG Justin Smiley, according to Smiley.

I found this article, what do you guys think. Maybe Alex Brown, or Briggs????

I looked all over the rumor sites, where did you find this? Looks like kffl but I didn't see it. Add looking at the scouts grade, he's rated lower then garza. Don't know if we'd give up much for him, especially after we drafted a good G prospect in the draft and have metcalf locked up long term cheap.

Darth Celtic wrote:I looked all over the rumor sites, where did you find this? Looks like kffl but I didn't see it. Add looking at the scouts grade, he's rated lower then garza. Don't know if we'd give up much for him, especially after we drafted a good G prospect in the draft and have metcalf locked up long term cheap.

I saw it in a different forumn, but he didn't supply a link either. But a few posters mentioned that they heard the same thing. I didn't really think a Briggs or Brown straight up trade would work, but those are really the only two people I could think of that were available. From what I have seen, I would say that Smiley is better then Garza, but I don't think he is that great.

Briggs for , that would be stupid. However, I could see a Brown for Smiley+ low pick: making that deal seem balanced.

IVSKIN wrote:Bears | Team interested in Smiley
Mon, 21 May 2007 13:26:00 -0700

Matt Maiocco, of the Santa Rosa Press Democrat, reports the Chicago Bears have called the San Francisco 49ers about possibly trading for 49ers OG Justin Smiley, according to Smiley.

I found this article, what do you guys think. Maybe Alex Brown, or Briggs????

We already have three starting quality guards in Reuben Brown, Garza and Metcalf with fourth round pick Beekman being valued as a late second round pick by most draft experts. I wouldn't mind adding a young tackle, but giving up anything for a guard at this point seems unlikely.

yeah, agreed, we won't be trading for another gaurd. Beekman will be a c/g.

Tait/St. Clair

Brown/Metcalf

Kruetz/Beekman

Garza/Metcalf/Beekman

Miller/Brant

that's 10 Oline, I don't see us keeping 11.

Darth Celtic wrote:yeah, agreed, we won't be trading for another gaurd. Beekman will be a c/g.

Tait/St. Clair

Brown/Metcalf

Kruetz/Beekman

Garza/Metcalf/Beekman

Miller/Brant

that's 10 Oline, I don't see us keeping 11.

that's only 9.

ok, well, we'll keep one more 10th stringer, but usually only suit 7 or 8 on game day.