Who should be the Bears Starting Quarterback?
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 7:42 am
Well?
We all have opinions. They are all very divisive. I have been posting on this and I will try to restrain myself so that we can get to discussion and not a screamfest.
As I see each asset:
Rex Grossman Postiives: Great arm. Really. He can make every throw. It's why he wows everybody in practice. He is also a hard worker and a student of film (more on this later) and wel liked by teammates and coaching staff. Tremendous play action ability. Can throw off this to the skinny post at will if the defense bites. If the defense bites at all on play action he will own the defense.
Res Grossman Negatives: Inexplicable decisionmaking. Inexplicable ability to make mistakes (see: taking the ball from under center). Cannot audible. Cannot pre read a defense. Short. Not very mobile. Bad fourth quarter numbers. Very succeptible to up the middle pass rush.
Now for the rest:
Brian Griese assets: Highest career QB rating of any Bear QB (ever?). Unbelievably intelligent. Not known for a great arm but it is good. A multi year veteran.
Brian Griese negatives: Has jumped around a lot. That can't be good. Makes some mistakes. Has had personal problems that restricted his career in the past. Although, after Denver, he has never been in a stable organization setting. He would still be in Tampa if they could have paid him. Still. . .
Kyle Orton Assets: Arm is okay. On intermediate routes he is very good. Obviiouslly, loves the shotgun. Intelligent. Made surprisingly few mistakes in 15 games as a Rookie. This was also due to gameplanning but Kyle did execute that gameplan. Can make throws down field and is underrated in this aspect. Is taking the game seriously now. Very muc so.
Kyle Orton Negatives: Hard to say. We only saw him play as a rookie. Kyle looks better now than then. He obviouslly was raw in his rookie season. There were many stories that he partied too much in his rookie season. This may or may not have led to his demotion despite the winning record. This could have run deep in the lockerroom.
That's how I see them. Rtae them how you like. I believe that Griese should start because history says he should. His numbers are better and though he wasn't in as many playoff games, he played in a much much much harder division.
We all have opinions. They are all very divisive. I have been posting on this and I will try to restrain myself so that we can get to discussion and not a screamfest.
As I see each asset:
Rex Grossman Postiives: Great arm. Really. He can make every throw. It's why he wows everybody in practice. He is also a hard worker and a student of film (more on this later) and wel liked by teammates and coaching staff. Tremendous play action ability. Can throw off this to the skinny post at will if the defense bites. If the defense bites at all on play action he will own the defense.
Res Grossman Negatives: Inexplicable decisionmaking. Inexplicable ability to make mistakes (see: taking the ball from under center). Cannot audible. Cannot pre read a defense. Short. Not very mobile. Bad fourth quarter numbers. Very succeptible to up the middle pass rush.
Now for the rest:
Brian Griese assets: Highest career QB rating of any Bear QB (ever?). Unbelievably intelligent. Not known for a great arm but it is good. A multi year veteran.
Brian Griese negatives: Has jumped around a lot. That can't be good. Makes some mistakes. Has had personal problems that restricted his career in the past. Although, after Denver, he has never been in a stable organization setting. He would still be in Tampa if they could have paid him. Still. . .
Kyle Orton Assets: Arm is okay. On intermediate routes he is very good. Obviiouslly, loves the shotgun. Intelligent. Made surprisingly few mistakes in 15 games as a Rookie. This was also due to gameplanning but Kyle did execute that gameplan. Can make throws down field and is underrated in this aspect. Is taking the game seriously now. Very muc so.
Kyle Orton Negatives: Hard to say. We only saw him play as a rookie. Kyle looks better now than then. He obviouslly was raw in his rookie season. There were many stories that he partied too much in his rookie season. This may or may not have led to his demotion despite the winning record. This could have run deep in the lockerroom.
That's how I see them. Rtae them how you like. I believe that Griese should start because history says he should. His numbers are better and though he wasn't in as many playoff games, he played in a much much much harder division.