
I find this poll unbelievable. 35,000+ fans and "Other" gets 23% to the Bears 18% for best team in the NFC.

Moderator: chitownsports4ever
emperorjones wrote:http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/7174442?MSNHPHCP>1=10473
![]()
I find this poll unbelievable. 35,000+ fans and "Other" gets 23% to the Bears 18% for best team in the NFC.
_CBS7_ wrote:There was another poll that had them behind the Eagles as well, and another that had the Saints as a choice for "who will win the super bowl" but not the Bears.
I've gotten used to it, the media and the general public thinks the Bears are super overrated.
If we don't do well next year, everyone will say they saw it coming, but if they do do well next year, everyone will say that they aren't suprised.
Cliff Levingston wrote:Yea. A lowly 2nd in the NFL in points scored just won't cut it in the NFL.
PistonFan4Life wrote:And how many of those point did your offense actually score? I know you defense puts up a lot of your points or gives you a short field to play with making it a lot easier. Look at the amount of 1st downs you guys achieve or converted 3rd downs, I bet the number you find doesn't rank 2nd in the NFL.
Cliff Levingston wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Does it matter how we put up points? Is a touchdown not worth 6 points if Devin Hester returns a punt or the defense gives the offense the ball on the opponent's 20?
The fact of the matter is that everyone remembers what they saw last; a complete debacle by the Bears in the superbowl. Nevermind how they were playing one of the best teams in the NFL at the time (without two of our 3 best defensive players Mike Brown and Tommie Harris) and, as bad as we played, were still in the game in the 4th quarter.
We completely destroyed the Saints in the playoffs, yet somehow they're better than us now because we lost Thomas Jones? Or, the Cowboys are better than us now because they downgraded their head coach? Or maybe it's because Romo, who was equally as bad as Rex when at his worst, will get better this season... but Rex won't.
Apparently now if you make it the superbowl, you're not very good.
PistonFan4Life wrote:When you act like you have the 2nd best offense in the league then in my mind yes it matters, because your offense is average at best. I looked it up 15th in total offense, meaning that your defense was responsible for you guys being a position to win a lot of game.
PistonFan4Life wrote:Now don't misunderstand me, I think the Bears are still one of the top 2 teams in the NFC, but if your defense does slip a little then your not going to be as good as you guys hope because your offense isn't good enough to win games on their own. I think thats that point your missing. I do think the Saints are a better team too, at least on offense they are a much better team, but that don't mean the Bears won't be going to the Superbowl again if their defense performs as it has the past 2 seasons.
PistonFan4Life wrote:Also in regards to totally destroying the Saints. I happen to disagree, you guys finally walked away in the 4th quarter of that game, but it was still within' reach until then. Now any other team with your defense would have ran away with that game early because your defense shut down the Saints, but your offense by no means got you guys to the Superbowl.
PistonFan4Life wrote:I guess the bottom line is its not that people don't consider the Bears a good team, its just that when people look at your offense they're not concerned that the Bears can beat them as much as they are concerned with teams like the Colts and Saints that can rack up points in a hurry.
Rodanlee wrote:just curious pistonfan4life... are you one of the people who think that the bears were the worst superbowl team ever? (i'm not trying to be a jerk---serious question)