Image Image Image Image

Bears just sign Brandon LLoyd!!

Moderator: chitownsports4ever

FRKMSTR
Junior
Posts: 354
And1: 22
Joined: Jul 26, 2006
       

Bears just sign Brandon LLoyd!! 

Post#1 » by FRKMSTR » Fri Mar 7, 2008 9:44 pm

Thoughts? He has been a bust everywhere he has been.
NLK
Head Coach
Posts: 6,093
And1: 9
Joined: Mar 12, 2006
Location: CHICAGO is a big market with many Rings! Eat S#%T New York!

 

Post#2 » by NLK » Fri Mar 7, 2008 9:50 pm

No, he wasn't a bust in San Fran. Plus, I would follow some of the Redskins game, I think he just wasn't given a real chance. I think its a low-risk and probably high reward situation for the BEARS. I think this is good. If he's trying to put himself back on the WR-Map, he'll have to do it with Rex, Kyle, or Drafted 2008 QB. Plus, he's a WR that can go across the middle to get a catch in tough spots, make spectacular grabs (like the one BB had vs. the broncos this past year), and he's quick. I'm not going to give Angelo a lot of props, but a good idea by bringing him in, now, not putting a lot of pressure on Hester and Bradley.
-NLK: Offending Djiboutians since November 2007
"You don't truly know someone, until you fight them."
"To deny our own impulses, is to deny the very essence that makes us human."
User avatar
The Sheik
General Manager
Posts: 8,466
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 01, 2006
Location: Irvine, Ca
         

 

Post#3 » by The Sheik » Fri Mar 7, 2008 10:47 pm

I agree with NLK, hopefully if he has the desire he will be given a chance to try and make something of himself. This is the type of signing I was expecting. Bradley if health will be the slot guy and hopefully Hester and Olsen are used more. So now we know we are going OL or RB in the 1st.
User avatar
Sonny_D1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,146
And1: 221
Joined: Jun 20, 2006
Location: Chicago

 

Post#4 » by Sonny_D1 » Fri Mar 7, 2008 11:11 pm

I had him on my fantasy team a few years back as a 5ht receiver. I never really played him, but I do remember him making some awfully difficult catches year in and year out.

Let's hope he can do that here, cause God knows he'll have plenty opportunities to make tough catches.
User avatar
PJ Brown
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,004
And1: 84
Joined: Feb 20, 2002
Location: SF by way of Albany Park
     

 

Post#5 » by PJ Brown » Fri Mar 7, 2008 11:48 pm

Hmmn, I'm finding it a bit hard to get excited about this, given he's an underachiever who barely played the last two years after being traded for. Here's to making the most of one last opportunity. Maybe it pays off.
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

 

Post#6 » by SportsWorld » Fri Mar 7, 2008 11:50 pm

Super Bowl!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111
User avatar
IlliniNRG
Rookie
Posts: 1,229
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 10, 2002
Location: Lincoln Square

 

Post#7 » by IlliniNRG » Sat Mar 8, 2008 12:26 am

NLK wrote:No, he wasn't a bust in San Fran. Plus, I would follow some of the Redskins game, I think he just wasn't given a real chance. I think its a low-risk and probably high reward situation for the BEARS. I think this is good. If he's trying to put himself back on the WR-Map, he'll have to do it with Rex, Kyle, or Drafted 2008 QB. Plus, he's a WR that can go across the middle to get a catch in tough spots, make spectacular grabs (like the one BB had vs. the broncos this past year), and he's quick. I'm not going to give Angelo a lot of props, but a good idea by bringing him in, now, not putting a lot of pressure on Hester and Bradley.


going across the middle is exactly what he doesn't do. fortunately the bears signed booker to do that, and lloyd to be the deep threat. basically we signed a poor-man's muhammed and a poor-man's berrian, jettisoning the real things.

nonetheless, this is a signing with no downside. lloyd may well have been held down in washington by crummy QBs and attitude - gibbs is much more old-school than Lovie - maybe the bears will catch lightning in a bottle.
User avatar
Posey H8er
RealGM
Posts: 20,095
And1: 64
Joined: Jan 07, 2007

 

Post#8 » by Posey H8er » Sat Mar 8, 2008 12:53 am

IlliniNRG wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



going across the middle is exactly what he doesn't do. fortunately the bears signed booker to do that, and lloyd to be the deep threat. basically we signed a poor-man's muhammed and a poor-man's berrian, jettisoning the real things.

nonetheless, this is a signing with no downside. lloyd may well have been held down in washington by crummy QBs and attitude - gibbs is much more old-school than Lovie - maybe the bears will catch lightning in a bottle.

I agree with everything you said, but I think Booker can be better than what Muhammad gave us last year. 556 yards looks pretty good on a 1-15 team with no quarterback. But we are basically an 8-8 team with no quarterback though . :cry:
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 58,256
And1: 18,498
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

 

Post#9 » by dougthonus » Sat Mar 8, 2008 12:59 am

We signed Lloyd to a one year deal for the league minimum.

For his talent level, I'm very happy to have done that. Will he work out as a #1 or #2 WR, probably not. He's getting paid like a #5/#6 guy who could be cut with no cap consequence.

He doesn't negatively effect our ability to sign other players and now gives us some decent depth at WR. We're going to have a big camp battle to see who comes out.

He'll probably be motivated due to his contract, it's basically a trial to save his NFL career.

I know I'm a moronic broken record with this, but WR is the position most reliant on the rest of the offensive talent. We don't have other good offensive talent. I'd rather go cheap on WRs and try and up the rest of the talent of the team.
http://linktr.ee/bullsbeat - links to the bullsbeat podcast
@doug_thonus on twitter
User avatar
Chewie
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,675
And1: 336
Joined: Jul 13, 2007
Location: Fishhawk, F-L-A.
       

 

Post#10 » by Chewie » Sat Mar 8, 2008 6:34 am

Apparently we're the dumping ground for the Redskins' crap - first Archuleta and now Lloyd.

In all seriousness, another low risk/low cost move that could end up working out. Why not ?

NOW maybe we can look at some o-linemen ??
A.J.
Banned User
Posts: 12,072
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 25, 2007
Location: Houston(University of Houston in 2009)

 

Post#11 » by A.J. » Sat Mar 8, 2008 3:37 pm

vikings fan here...i have a question,

do you think you guys are going WR in the draft in round 1?
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 58,256
And1: 18,498
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

 

Post#12 » by dougthonus » Sat Mar 8, 2008 5:30 pm

I doubt it.
http://linktr.ee/bullsbeat - links to the bullsbeat podcast
@doug_thonus on twitter
User avatar
The Sheik
General Manager
Posts: 8,466
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 01, 2006
Location: Irvine, Ca
         

 

Post#13 » by The Sheik » Sat Mar 8, 2008 5:46 pm

A.J. wrote:vikings fan here...i have a question,

do you think you guys are going WR in the draft in round 1?


I doubt it AJ, probably OT or RB.

My guess is we are hoping for Clady or Williams and if they are both gone we go with Mendenhall.
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

 

Post#14 » by SportsWorld » Sat Mar 8, 2008 8:03 pm

I want Mendenhall more and more in the 1st round. Scouts actually are liking him more than Darren McFadden so far. But I doubt Angelo goes RB in the first round and will end up going OL.
User avatar
NoSkyy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,014
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 20, 2007

 

Post#15 » by NoSkyy » Sat Mar 8, 2008 8:10 pm

The only scenario I see us going WR is if we trade down for a couple more picks(for example, if we get Dallas' two pick(doubt it). I can see us going, Sweed/Albert.)
User avatar
Chewie
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,675
And1: 336
Joined: Jul 13, 2007
Location: Fishhawk, F-L-A.
       

 

Post#16 » by Chewie » Sat Mar 8, 2008 8:26 pm

A.J. wrote:vikings fan here...i have a question,

do you think you guys are going WR in the draft in round 1?


Highly unlikely.
User avatar
Posey H8er
RealGM
Posts: 20,095
And1: 64
Joined: Jan 07, 2007

 

Post#17 » by Posey H8er » Sat Mar 8, 2008 9:31 pm

I like this signing. It is very low risk, and he could bring out some real talent with being reunited with Ron Turner.
User avatar
SWIFTSLICK
Banned User
Posts: 5,951
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 25, 2003
Location: Nomadic Drifter

 

Post#18 » by SWIFTSLICK » Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:17 am

Actually i'm not that thrilled about this signing. Along with re-signing Booker(five years too late) it just adds yet another mediocre player to the WR core (none of which are outstanding). I hope the draft is alot more exciting than free agency. Because my overall reaction, not impressed...still 7-9 at best.
Howling Mad
General Manager
Posts: 9,043
And1: 624
Joined: Jun 28, 2006

 

Post#19 » by Howling Mad » Mon Mar 10, 2008 1:56 pm

SportsWorld wrote:I want Mendenhall more and more in the 1st round. Scouts actually are liking him more than Darren McFadden so far. But I doubt Angelo goes RB in the first round and will end up going OL.


I'm not sure, SW. I'm thinking more and more that Angelo is thinking running back for the first pick and an OL later for rounds 2-3.

This is a deep draft for OL, so the drop off from the top O-linemen isn't very far off.

However the drop off for RB is steep after the first round-late second talent.

There is McFadden who will go early and then the rest. Mendenhall, Chris Johnson, Felix Jones and John Stewart. After that the drop is a steep hill.

Those RB won't go past the early 2nd round. The worst of the bunch, Chris Johnson, is the fastest, so at this time(combine-prospect evaluation), his 40 time(fastest of all running backs) is looking real sexy.

Mendenhall didn't have a bad time, it was actually excellent, a 4.4something rather, but Johnson's and McFadden's 4.2's dwarf that time.

Teams with picks ahead of us are the Ravens, Bengals, Saints, Bills, Broncos, and Panthers.

The Ravens have McGahee, Bengals need defense bad, Saints have RB(unless they plan to move Bush to WR), Bills are ok with their RB, and the Broncos never have a stud RB(they usually rely and give credit to their OL for the running game). The Panthers have have D. Foster and they just used a recent pick on DeAngelo Williams.

It could be very likely that Mendenhall is there for the Bears, and then it would be really tough to pass up a talent like that with Benson and Petersen as your 1-2 punch.

Mendenhall is the prototypical body we need for running back, nice and bulky, and his style is perfect. Hes a pretty quick running back more so than he is fast. His open-field breakout speed won't wow anybody, but in the NFL you need more quick and less fast. Not that his speed is below NFL standards, but his quickness for his size is surprising.

Mendenhall and McFadden are obviously 1,2. Then a veryslight drop off to Felix Jones, Stewart, and Johnson.

The latter three aren't worth an early pick to suffer a little on O, but the first two definitely are. Mendenhall might be the RB to bring this team back.
Cliff Levingston
RealGM
Posts: 22,667
And1: 1,094
Joined: May 29, 2003
Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
       

 

Post#20 » by Cliff Levingston » Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:13 pm

So, how do our WR's look now?

- Hester
- Bradley
- Davis
- Booker
- Lloyd

Who's the #1 and #2 out of the group? Cliff Levingston seriously has no idea, but is still with Doug in that WR is the least important offensive position for the Bears right now.

Return to Chicago Bears