Picks 247 & 248: OT Kirk Barton and WR Marcus Monk
Moderator: chitownsports4ever
Picks 247 & 248: OT Kirk Barton and WR Marcus Monk
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 51,601
- And1: 133
- Joined: Dec 03, 2006
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
-
Picks 247 & 248: OT Kirk Barton and WR Marcus Monk
Discuss these guys who will be cut in a few weeks.
- Posey H8er
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,095
- And1: 64
- Joined: Jan 07, 2007
Monk has the size which I like. He also had a 4.42 40.
Strengths:
Has excellent size and a large frame...Long arms...Very athletic and smooth...Big, reliable hands...Good ball skills and body control...Excellent leaper...Knows how to use his frame...Is strong and tough...Very smart...Can be a terror in the red zone.
Weaknesses:
Doesn't have top game speed...Will have trouble separating from pro corners..Not very quick or explosive and lacks a burst..Needs to improve as a route runner...He offers very little after the catch..Is not a big play threat and won't stretch the field vertically..Questionable motor / effort...Not much of a blocker...Durability concerns.
Notes:
The valedictorian of his high school class...Was also a great basketball player as a prep and could have seen action on the hardwood for the Razorbacks...Burst onto the scene as a true freshman but was never able to regain that initial magic...Has battled shoulder and knee injuries...You have to like some of the physical tools he brings to the table....Lack of speed & injuries figure to hold him back on Draft Day.
Strengths:
Has excellent size and a large frame...Long arms...Very athletic and smooth...Big, reliable hands...Good ball skills and body control...Excellent leaper...Knows how to use his frame...Is strong and tough...Very smart...Can be a terror in the red zone.
Weaknesses:
Doesn't have top game speed...Will have trouble separating from pro corners..Not very quick or explosive and lacks a burst..Needs to improve as a route runner...He offers very little after the catch..Is not a big play threat and won't stretch the field vertically..Questionable motor / effort...Not much of a blocker...Durability concerns.
Notes:
The valedictorian of his high school class...Was also a great basketball player as a prep and could have seen action on the hardwood for the Razorbacks...Burst onto the scene as a true freshman but was never able to regain that initial magic...Has battled shoulder and knee injuries...You have to like some of the physical tools he brings to the table....Lack of speed & injuries figure to hold him back on Draft Day.
- CjayC
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,546
- And1: 1,169
- Joined: Mar 02, 2005
- Location: Hoiball
-
Monk isn't a nobody.This is a guy that was looking at 2nd or 3rd round before injury.Could be a Marques Colston esque pick for the Bears
But for players like wide receiver Marcus Monk, Tuesday was a chance to shine and change the opinions of a league full of doubters.
After missing the bulk of his senior season at Arkansas because of a knee injury and two subsequent surgeries, Monk still garnered an invite to the Combine last month but didn
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,667
- And1: 1,094
- Joined: May 29, 2003
- Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
-
-
- NFL Analyst
- Posts: 16,964
- And1: 129
- Joined: Apr 30, 2001
- Location: Back in the 616
- Contact:
-
I like Monk but he makes Mike Brown seem like Cal Ripken in terms of durability. He cannot take a hit and it shows in his effort on high throws, which is an issue for tall WRs. If he gets healthy and plays without fear of getting hurt, the Beras have themselves a 50-catch, 700-yard, 6 TD guy. Huge ifs though...
Kirk Barton should not make an NFL roster. I say this as a Buckeye lifer and someone who gets paid (very little) to evaluate linemen. If he loses 15-20 pounds and takes some ballet classes so his feet actually leave the ground, he might make it as a reserve interior OL. You put him at tackle and your QB is on IR within 10 throws.
Kirk Barton should not make an NFL roster. I say this as a Buckeye lifer and someone who gets paid (very little) to evaluate linemen. If he loses 15-20 pounds and takes some ballet classes so his feet actually leave the ground, he might make it as a reserve interior OL. You put him at tackle and your QB is on IR within 10 throws.
It's not whether you win or lose, it's how good you look playing the game
- Chewie
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,675
- And1: 336
- Joined: Jul 13, 2007
- Location: Fishhawk, F-L-A.
-
Icness wrote:I like Monk but he makes Mike Brown seem like Cal Ripken in terms of durability. He cannot take a hit and it shows in his effort on high throws, which is an issue for tall WRs. If he gets healthy and plays without fear of getting hurt, the Beras have themselves a 50-catch, 700-yard, 6 TD guy. Huge ifs though...
I guess any 7th rounder is going to come with some caveats. Thanks for the info. With that speed/size, he looks worthy of a late round pick.
- CjayC
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,546
- And1: 1,169
- Joined: Mar 02, 2005
- Location: Hoiball
-
Icness wrote:I like Monk but he makes Mike Brown seem like Cal Ripken in terms of durability. He cannot take a hit and it shows in his effort on high throws, which is an issue for tall WRs. If he gets healthy and plays without fear of getting hurt, the Beras have themselves a 50-catch, 700-yard, 6 TD guy. Huge ifs though...
Wouldn't go that far yet about the durability thing.
He only had problems after his Junior year.Mike Brown however had injury concerns coming out of College,and even today still has injury concerns.
With his size however I do feel that he should be more physical than what Reports say about him.
I am praying that he gets healthy at this point though.If that knee gets better the Bears will have themselves a serious threat at WR.One that wouldn't make the rest of our mediocre WR's core look so bad.
- TNBT
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 21,287
- And1: 208
- Joined: Sep 21, 2001
- Location: Australia
-
CBS7 wrote:I see a lot of people saying the same thing about the Marcus Monk pick - a potential steal. And if he does absolutely nothing, no biggie. He was picked 248th.
I agree. Being in Australia, I don't really get to watch much football, especially on the college level, so I don't know a great deal about the players we picked other than what I have read in scouting reports and what you guys have to say. Still, I'm starting to like the Monk pick. He has size and speed, which is a great starting point for a WR. Sure he has his problems, but if he can develop into a halfway decent reciever, he'll be a steal considering where we drafted him.
- T_chandlerfan
- Senior
- Posts: 690
- And1: 4
- Joined: Apr 27, 2002
- Location: I definitely feel like the fourth quarter is my time
- Contact: