Going forward
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 3:14 am
So the Bears are 3-3, they've outscored their opponents by 39 points while being one of 2 teams to play 4 road games. The difficultly of their schedule thus far has been fairly rough thus far besides the Lions game. The defense hasn't been incredible but they've been above average thus far. The offense has far exceed every expectation for them thus far. Kyle Orton has grown right in front of our eyes and nobody in the national media has noticed. For whatever reason, the offensive line has recovered back to a level of respectability.
Going into the season the entire offense sans pretty much Desmond Clark were rated as the absolute worst in the NFL but week by week we've seen growth from the skill positions. Greg Olsen has recovered from the Carolina nightmare to make some big plays. Devin Hester has gone from not knowing plays to being a playmaker at the WR spot. Brandon Lloyd was making circus catch after circus catch until he got hurt. Marty Booker has looked like somebody who Orton can count on coming out from the slot. Matt Forte is 4th in the NFL in yards from scrimmage and tied for 7th overall in total touchdowns. Mike Brown is healthy and they've clearly changed his role as a player to keep away from risk so we might just see him on the field all season. They've got a fairly easy schedule going forward and those close games tend to even out over the course of the season.
I think that if it came down to it, I'd rather have a team that looks good in September and October but has some unlucky breaks and picks up steam later in the season than the 2006 season where they dominated early but fell apart late (even though they did come back to go to the Super Bowl, they clearly weren't the same team in January than they were in September/October). I for one am optimistic about this team as long as Mike Brown stays healthy. They could easily be 6-0 but what good was being 7-0 in the 2006 season in the long run? They only need to win the division and I believe they're good enough to do some damage in the playoffs.
Going into the season the entire offense sans pretty much Desmond Clark were rated as the absolute worst in the NFL but week by week we've seen growth from the skill positions. Greg Olsen has recovered from the Carolina nightmare to make some big plays. Devin Hester has gone from not knowing plays to being a playmaker at the WR spot. Brandon Lloyd was making circus catch after circus catch until he got hurt. Marty Booker has looked like somebody who Orton can count on coming out from the slot. Matt Forte is 4th in the NFL in yards from scrimmage and tied for 7th overall in total touchdowns. Mike Brown is healthy and they've clearly changed his role as a player to keep away from risk so we might just see him on the field all season. They've got a fairly easy schedule going forward and those close games tend to even out over the course of the season.
I think that if it came down to it, I'd rather have a team that looks good in September and October but has some unlucky breaks and picks up steam later in the season than the 2006 season where they dominated early but fell apart late (even though they did come back to go to the Super Bowl, they clearly weren't the same team in January than they were in September/October). I for one am optimistic about this team as long as Mike Brown stays healthy. They could easily be 6-0 but what good was being 7-0 in the 2006 season in the long run? They only need to win the division and I believe they're good enough to do some damage in the playoffs.