Image Image Image Image

Steve Smith?

Moderator: chitownsports4ever

Cliff Levingston
RealGM
Posts: 22,667
And1: 1,094
Joined: May 29, 2003
Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
       

Steve Smith? 

Post#1 » by Cliff Levingston » Tue Mar 9, 2010 4:25 pm

This is just a thought after reading Icness' "Rules of Thumb" in the wiretap. It definitely seems like the Panthers are writing off this year so it makes Cliff Levingston wonder if acquiring Steve Smith would be possible. He plugs a big hole we've got in a big way. Even though we don't have a whole lot to offer (maybe our 3rd this year and 2nd next year?) it might we worth looking into.

Thoughts? Is Cliff Levingston just spinning his wheels here?
User avatar
ChronicKerr
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,572
And1: 59
Joined: May 23, 2007
Location: Old Town
       

Re: Steve Smith? 

Post#2 » by ChronicKerr » Tue Mar 9, 2010 4:55 pm

While he would be an upgrade I don't think he's the ideal #1 guy we're looking for. He'll be 31 come the season and is 5'9. We already have so many speedy small guys it just seems a bit redundant to add another one who is on the downside of his career as it is already. If we could get him for peanuts it would certainly be an upgrade but I just don't see it happening.
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

Re: Steve Smith? 

Post#3 » by SportsWorld » Tue Mar 9, 2010 11:43 pm

Steve Smith had a pretty good year last year with Jake Delhomme having an awful season. I still think he has a year or two left.
User avatar
Chewie
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,675
And1: 336
Joined: Jul 13, 2007
Location: Fishhawk, F-L-A.
       

Re: Steve Smith? 

Post#4 » by Chewie » Wed Mar 10, 2010 2:23 am

I'd be all for it if the price is right. He plays so much bigger than his height.
Turn down for what?
shugknight
Senior
Posts: 696
And1: 74
Joined: Aug 04, 2006
Location: starts with a C ends with an O and in the middle is HICAG

Re: Steve Smith? 

Post#5 » by shugknight » Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:14 am

I'd give him a shot. But def not worth a future first or second.

Call me silly but I really like Owens. Here's hoping nobody signs him and we give him a 1 year filled with incentives contract. Hey if it doesn't work, at least it would be fun to watch!
User avatar
Balance-a-Bull
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,347
And1: 2
Joined: Mar 28, 2006
Location: Somewhere angry and lost in the Bulls brass psyche, where offense is an afterthought

Re: Steve Smith? 

Post#6 » by Balance-a-Bull » Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:05 pm

shugknight wrote:I'd give him a shot. But def not worth a future first or second.

Call me silly but I really like Owens. Here's hoping nobody signs him and we give him a 1 year filled with incentives contract. Hey if it doesn't work, at least it would be fun to watch!


I agree with your post and would give Smith a chance also. I still remember when he was a one man wrecking crew against us in the playoffs a few years back.

In terms of sacrificing 1st or 2nd round pick, I would say no also, but yes to Brandon Marshall.

I would not mind bringing in TO either. He would bring some fun, excitement and pizazz.

Since this regime is in a win now mode, a bold move to bring in a legit seasoned #1 WR would seal the deal for me.
A plea for post scoring is a plausible Bulls plan, but plainly isn't a priority. In response to a post player's dismay about his lack of points in the paint, Paxson said.... "I'm not nearly as concerned about the offensive stuff as he is."
User avatar
ChronicKerr
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,572
And1: 59
Joined: May 23, 2007
Location: Old Town
       

Re: Steve Smith? 

Post#7 » by ChronicKerr » Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:26 pm

Antonio Bryant is probably the most feasible right now after all the money we've spent but Cincy is looking hard at him and he might be asking for more than were willing to pony up after the spending spree we just went on. While he isn't in the same league as Marshall or Smith I just don't see us trading any top draft picks in the top 3-4 rounds which would certainly need to be included to get either of those players.
Cliff Levingston
RealGM
Posts: 22,667
And1: 1,094
Joined: May 29, 2003
Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
       

Re: Steve Smith? 

Post#8 » by Cliff Levingston » Wed Mar 10, 2010 10:00 pm

Bryant just signed with Cincinnati. As far as Steve Smith goes, maybe a 2nd next year is pushing it, but Cliff Levingston would do our 3rd this year and maybe a 3rd or 4th rounder next year. Just because he's 31 doesn't mean he can't play. We've got to find guys who can play right now regardless of their age.
shugknight
Senior
Posts: 696
And1: 74
Joined: Aug 04, 2006
Location: starts with a C ends with an O and in the middle is HICAG

Re: Steve Smith? 

Post#9 » by shugknight » Thu Mar 11, 2010 1:00 am

Cliff Levingston wrote:Bryant just signed with Cincinnati. As far as Steve Smith goes, maybe a 2nd next year is pushing it, but Cliff Levingston would do our 3rd this year and maybe a 3rd or 4th rounder next year. Just because he's 31 doesn't mean he can't play. We've got to find guys who can play right now regardless of their age.


I would do that in a heart beat. Our 3rd rounders always crap out anyways.

But back to my point on T.O. not only would he give us a legit #1 WR, he'll also distract alot of media attention away from Cutler and our young receiving core. Which I think may be helpful. IF he doesn't pan out and is a complete locker room headcase.. then cut him.

Has anyone heard if the Bears are still spending? Been awfully quiet since the big 2.5
Kyben36
Banned User
Posts: 991
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 16, 2008

Re: Steve Smith? 

Post#10 » by Kyben36 » Thu Mar 11, 2010 4:58 am

Hell of a player, but not what we need.
Mr Point
Banned User
Posts: 105
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 07, 2009

Re: Steve Smith? 

Post#11 » by Mr Point » Thu Mar 11, 2010 3:30 pm

shugknight wrote:
Cliff Levingston wrote:Bryant just signed with Cincinnati. As far as Steve Smith goes, maybe a 2nd next year is pushing it, but Cliff Levingston would do our 3rd this year and maybe a 3rd or 4th rounder next year. Just because he's 31 doesn't mean he can't play. We've got to find guys who can play right now regardless of their age.


I would do that in a heart beat. Our 3rd rounders always crap out anyways.

But back to my point on T.O. not only would he give us a legit #1 WR, he'll also distract alot of media attention away from Cutler and our young receiving core. Which I think may be helpful. IF he doesn't pan out and is a complete locker room headcase.. then cut him.

Has anyone heard if the Bears are still spending? Been awfully quiet since the big 2.5


Heard they're looking into getting another TE. As if six aint enough. :roll:
Howling Mad
General Manager
Posts: 9,043
And1: 624
Joined: Jun 28, 2006

Re: Steve Smith? 

Post#12 » by Howling Mad » Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:50 pm

Kyben36 wrote:Hell of a player, but not what we need.


Ditto.

Personally I like Shug's idea of T.O.
NLK
Head Coach
Posts: 6,093
And1: 9
Joined: Mar 12, 2006
Location: CHICAGO is a big market with many Rings! Eat S#%T New York!

Re: Steve Smith? 

Post#13 » by NLK » Sat Mar 20, 2010 2:46 am

Everything CL said in his post, I 2nd.
-NLK: Offending Djiboutians since November 2007
"You don't truly know someone, until you fight them."
"To deny our own impulses, is to deny the very essence that makes us human."

Return to Chicago Bears