Browns vs Ravens 9/30 Game Thread

Cav-Titan-Cub · Post #1 » by **Cav-Titan-Cub** » Mon Sep 24, 2007 7:38 pm

vs.

Date: September 30, 2007
Time: 1:00pm ET
TV: CBS

Who's Hot?

Derek Anderson:

Kellen Winslow:

Braylon Edwards:

Kamerion Wimbley:

Post #2 » by **Icness** » Sat Sep 29, 2007 1:24 pm

Browns have won 2 of the last 3 meetings in Cleveland, and the loss was by 6 points.

Ravens are banged up, will not have Samari Rolle at CB. Jon Ogden is questionable, which means he probably won't play against Wimbley, who would give him trouble with his speed anyways. Demetrius Williams and Derrick Mason are both iffy at WR too.

I think the Browns can win this one so long as they take care of the ball, even though I picked against them

The full writeup:
Baltimore Ravens (12) at Cleveland Browns (27): Two examples of how to handle QB controversies here. Baltimore usurped former young starter Kyle Boller with vet Steve McNair a season ago, but they kept Boller

Post #3 » by **TheOUTLAW** » Sun Sep 30, 2007 6:35 pm

So far the Brownies are wooping that booty. They are up at the half 24-6.

Post #4 » by **B Mac** » Sun Sep 30, 2007 8:15 pm

Who knew that watching the Browns play could actually be fun and not painful?

Post #5 » by **TheOUTLAW** » Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:04 pm

I'm convinced that Billick is an idiot. Have they actually watched any footage of the Browns? No way would I put together any type of game plan that didn't count for running the ball 90% of the time. What an idiot. But I'm thrilled to get the win.

Post #6 » by **Icness** » Tue Oct 2, 2007 3:00 am

I've almost never been so happy to be proven wrong!

Post #7 » by **TheOUTLAW** » Tue Oct 2, 2007 2:05 pm

Am I the only one who thinks that the Browns tend to go into a shell once they get a lead. I think they are a bit concerned that Anderson might give the ball away so they basically don't take any risks once theyget a lead.

snazel · Post #8 » by **snazel** » Tue Oct 2, 2007 4:18 pm

TheOUTLAW wrote:Am I the only one who thinks that the Browns tend to go into a shell once they get a lead. I think they are a bit concerned that Anderson might give the ball away so they basically don't take any risks once theyget a lead.

Yea they do go in a shell...They almost have to. They had to do it with Charlie and they still have to do it with DA. Even tho DA has gotten better, he still makes a lot of inaccurate throws and throws into heavy coverage...our D was playing good enough to not give up points throughout the whole game so protecting the lead was the right thing to do IMO.

Gordon Bombay · Post #9 » by **Gordon Bombay** » Tue Oct 2, 2007 9:06 pm

B Mac wrote:Who knew that watching the Browns play could actually be fun and not painful?

i never would have thought that after the steelers game