Ribalding wrote:btw, there was one really stupid/hostile question at the McHale presser this morning.
Anybody care to venture a guess as to who asked it?
Guessing it was this one:
When looking at the finalists for the Rockets’ head coaching job and their overall record, all were under .500. How does that mesh with stated goals of being a championship contending team?
LA: That’s an interesting question, seriously. I think a real smart guy who knows the game, when he starts out and doesn’t have great success, it’s a benefit to him because he will now say, “OK, why wasn’t I unbelievably successful right now?” And he’ll think about it and implement the things he needs. If he was unbelievably successful the first 30 games let’s say, he wouldn’t change because he’d say, “I’m successful.” But now, Kevin has seen what it takes and how it takes and what he needs to be a great success in this league. He’s the kind of guy I think will do that.
DM: I would add to that. When you’re looking at a coaching record you’ve got to look (at other things, too). We’re all evaluated on wins and losses and that’s how it should be, but when you look at a coaching record you’ve got to look deeper. You’ve got to look at how when Kevin took over for those teams how they did better with him than the person he took over from. You’ve got to look at the players that are on that roster and who got better. And you’ve got to look at things like we do which is the quality of the shots that they got when Kevin was the coach, the quality of the shots they gave up being worse for the other team – you have to look deeper when you look at coaching record.
Every good coach in this league, I challenge you to find one, has been an sub-.500 coach at one point or another.
Professional answer to a jackass question. Good job guys!