Would you rather have

Roddy B for 3 · 7/1/2019 (I broke a mirror on 7-1-2012)

Howard
Jones
Ariza
Harden
Beverley

Or

Asik
Jones
Parsons
Harden
Dragic

?

I know which one would be more exciting to watch

Br0ken_Sp0ke · Post #2 » by **Br0ken_Sp0ke** » Tue Jan 20, 2015 11:48 am

Not sure what the point of this thread is, but the current team is better than your hypothetical one.

000001 · Post #3 » by **000001** » Wed Jan 21, 2015 5:38 pm

Roddy B for 3 wrote:Howard
Jones
Ariza
Harden
Beverley

Or

Asik
Jones
Parsons
Harden
Dragic

?

I know which one would be more exciting to watch

team 1

howard>dragic
parsons=ariza
asik=beverly

not by much pretty much same level teams

Post #4 » by **Mr. E** » Wed Jan 21, 2015 8:13 pm

Why Jones instead of Motiejunas?

texasholdem · Post #5 » by **texasholdem** » Thu Jan 22, 2015 7:13 pm

What if we had lost the Howard sweepstakes in 2013?
and signed Paul Millsap and Brandon Jennings with that $20 million in cap space instead?
Would we be better off with Asik/Millsap/Parsons/Jennings/Harden
than Howard/Jonestijunas/Ariza/Beverley/Harden

Post #6 » by **jwise44** » Thu Jan 22, 2015 7:48 pm

Isn't ASIK having a terrible year?

I ask this as a huge fan of him

texasholdem · Post #7 » by **texasholdem** » Thu Jan 22, 2015 7:52 pm

jwise44 wrote:Isn't ASIK having a terrible year?

Better than last year. 10.2 rpg in only 25.7 mpg is pretty good. Shot blocking is down but Davis gets a lot of those.

quatin · Post #8 » by **quatin** » Wed Jan 28, 2015 6:42 pm

Roddy B for 3 wrote:Howard
Jones
Ariza
Harden
Beverley

Or

Asik
Jones
Parsons
Harden
Dragic

?

I know which one would be more exciting to watch

#1 has way better defense than #2. A Dragic + Harden offense is less versatile than a Harden + Howard offense, especially with stone hands Asik in the paint. I think #1 is much more preferable.

texasholdem · Post #9 » by **texasholdem** » Wed Jan 28, 2015 7:14 pm

quatin wrote:
Roddy B for 3 wrote:Howard
Jones
Ariza
Harden
Beverley

Or

Asik
Jones
Parsons
Harden
Dragic

?

I know which one would be more exciting to watch

#1 has way better defense than #2. A Dragic + Harden offense is less versatile than a Harden + Howard offense, especially with stone hands Asik in the paint. I think #1 is much more preferable.

Harden + Asik + Parsons + Beverley + Garcia/Lin = lost to Thunder in 6 games. Eliminated in 1st round
Harden + Howard + Parsons + Beverley + Jones/Asik = lost to Blazers in 6 games. Eliminated in 1st round

We need a second ball handler who can create other than Harden

quatin · Post #10 » by **quatin** » Wed Jan 28, 2015 7:36 pm

texasholdem wrote:Harden + Asik + Parsons + Beverley + Garcia/Lin = lost to Thunder in 6 games. Eliminated in 1st round
Harden + Howard + Parsons + Beverley + Jones/Asik = lost to Blazers in 6 games. Eliminated in 1st round

We need a second ball handler who can create other than Harden

We need to play defense. Our problem was never offense.

2012-2013 #2 Offense Regular season/#4 Offense Post season #26 Defense regular season/#15 Defense Post season (2nd to last)
2013-2014 #2 Offense Regular season/#1 Offense Post season #21 Defense regular season/#16 Defense Post season (last)

Howard/Beverly defense is better than Dragic/Asik. Plus, you can still post up Howard. It's ugly, but it's there. Combine that with Ariza over Parsons, I think it's a pretty easy choice.

Nebula1 · Post #11 » by **Nebula1** » Wed Jan 28, 2015 7:52 pm

Dragic
Harden
Ariza
Jones
Howard

Bev
Brewer
Papa
DMO
Capela

That's what I want it to look like.