Page 1 of 1
Brooks for #5
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:13 pm
by ComeAtMeBro
Is there any word about this in Houston?
From what I'm hearing, Rockets made this offer. Sacramento rejected it. And now it's something the Rockets are trying to do last-second with GSW, Detroit, or the Clippers. They apparently want Monroe, or Ed Davis.
Any of this talk in Houston?
Re: Brooks for #5
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:27 pm
by yaoisgod
davis , monroe

Re: Brooks for #5
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:27 pm
by MaxRider
i believe our GM is targeting Cousins, but i think Kings want Cousins as well
top 5
1. Wall
2. Turner
3. Favors
4. Johnson
5. Cousins
Re: Brooks for #5
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:40 pm
by tmacformvp06
why would the rockets do this brooks is the best pg in the league
Re: Brooks for #5
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:42 pm
by yaoisgod
i think the twolves are going to draft cousins at 4 center > small forward
Re: Brooks for #5
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:44 pm
by yaoisgod
tmacformvp06 wrote:why would the rockets do this brooks is the best pg in the league
he is in his final year of his rookie contract
Re: Brooks for #5
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:46 pm
by tmacformvp06
yaoisgod wrote:tmacformvp06 wrote:why would the rockets do this brooks is the best pg in the league
he is in his final year of his rookie contract
then sign him to a max deal
Re: Brooks for #5
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:55 pm
by tiderulz
tmacformvp06 wrote:why would the rockets do this brooks is the best pg in the league
please tell me you were smoking when you wrote this. Rondo, D-Will, Chris Paul, Steve Nash, Derrick Rose disagree with your opinion.
Re: Brooks for #5
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:59 pm
by Guy986
Here is Morey's trade strategy: When in doubt deal with the Kings.
Re: Brooks for #5
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:35 pm
by Moreyball
If this did happen with swapping Brooks for a top 5 pick.
I gotta believe we will make a push for Chris Paul.
Re: Brooks for #5
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:44 pm
by MaxRider
yaoisgod wrote:i think the twolves are going to draft cousins at 4 center > small forward
they wanted johnson all along
nets even try to bluff them making them think they are taking johnson instead of favors
Re: Brooks for #5
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:09 pm
by tmacformvp06
tiderulz wrote:tmacformvp06 wrote:why would the rockets do this brooks is the best pg in the league
please tell me you were smoking when you wrote this. Rondo, D-Will, Chris Paul, Steve Nash, Derrick Rose disagree with your opinion.
nope brooks averages more points then all of them except rose. but rose plays no d so i take brooks. plus he can shoot 3s. i dont want a pg that cant know down the opens threes on my team
Re: Brooks for #5
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:36 pm
by tiderulz
tmacformvp06 wrote:tiderulz wrote:tmacformvp06 wrote:why would the rockets do this brooks is the best pg in the league
please tell me you were smoking when you wrote this. Rondo, D-Will, Chris Paul, Steve Nash, Derrick Rose disagree with your opinion.
nope brooks averages more points then all of them except rose. but rose plays no d so i take brooks. plus he can shoot 3s. i dont want a pg that cant know down the opens threes on my team
yes, but your point guard is also 19th in assists and 22nd in steals. there is more to being PG that just scoring, otherwise you are a shooting guard. Those other PG's do a lot more for their team than just score.
Re: Brooks for #5
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:48 pm
by HTown_TMac
smh at you taking this so seriously
Re: Brooks for #5
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:29 pm
by BB Chrome
AB is untouchable barring a trade for Wall or Chris Paul.
If anyone is being dangled, it's a resigned Kyle Lowry, Jefferies, Battier and Andersen.
Re: Brooks for #5
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:31 pm
by Aaron Brooks
Re: Brooks for #5
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:37 pm
by Smash3
Rockets first + brooks and Battier to GSW for their first and Ellis. They'll use Landry TE, Battier will probably be bought out.
Re: Brooks for #5
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 12:19 am
by MaxRider
Ed Davis is dropping
Re: Brooks for #5
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 1:41 am
by Vator
eh...no other mention of this anywhere other than here so lock...