RealGM

Any trades in the near future?

Yao is back uo by Miller, Andersen, and Chuck Hayes.
Scola is back up by Hill, Patterson, and Jeffries.
Ariza is back up by Battier and Harris.
Martin is back up by Budinger and Taylor.
Brooks by Lowry only.

we're still an all star short of being contenders. if we dont make a trade this offseason we'll make one by the deadline, hopefully no later than december.

morey wants a 3rd pg, but i dont htink we should, being in the lux tax. if one of our pgs go down we can sign players to 10 day contracts.

I don't think Harris will make the team. Maybe Chuck will get some minutes at the 3...

our bench is better than the twolves starters

17 players without counting Alex Johnson.

imagine having this team when we had a healthy yao and tmac
its a shame it took us so long to build a solid bench.
feels bad man

-Got em coach

This team is so deep, they can play different style verus different team.

Not just deep, but we have a lot of versitile players. We're going to be able to cause matchup problems for everyone we play with the various lineups we're capable of putting on the floor.

And do you know what really rocks about that? Our team is filled with "team-oriented" guys who aren't going to whine about minutes. We've got a good set of players here.

it's exciting isnt it? I cant wait for this season I'm gonna try to watch every game.

yaoisgod wrote:our bench is better than the twolves starters

according to last years stats
darko>miller
love>hill
beasley>battier
webster>budinger
flynn>lowry

i could maybe even say the twolves bench is better than the rockets bench
miller>is better than mn's next best center
hill<if i can use beasly again for backup pf
battier-we'll see how wesley johnson does
budinger<brewer
lowry<ridnour

i wanna know what kind of sick world you live in thinking michael beasley is better than shane battier or johnny flynn over kyle lowry or webster? over chase budinger.

and even at 34 i would put brad miller atleast even with Darko. He's probably better but I will cut you a little bit of slack since you're a noob (probably just a troll)

pumunga wrote:

yaoisgod wrote:our bench is better than the twolves starters

according to last years stats
darko>miller
love>hill
beasley>battier
webster>budinger
flynn>lowry

i could maybe even say the twolves bench is better than the rockets bench
miller>is better than mn's next best center
hill<if i can use beasly again for backup pf
battier-we'll see how wesley johnson does
budinger<brewer
lowry<ridnour

David Kahn, is that you?

pumunga wrote:

yaoisgod wrote:our bench is better than the twolves starters

according to last years stats
darko>miller
love>hill
beasley>battier
webster>budinger
flynn>lowry

i could maybe even say the twolves bench is better than the rockets bench
miller>is better than mn's next best center
hill<if i can use beasly again for backup pf
battier-we'll see how wesley johnson does
budinger<brewer
lowry<ridnour

Shut up.

Just. Shut. Up.

pumunga wrote:

yaoisgod wrote:our bench is better than the twolves starters

according to last years stats
darko>miller
love>hill
beasley>battier
webster>budinger
flynn>lowry

i could maybe even say the twolves bench is better than the rockets bench
miller>is better than mn's next best center
hill<if i can use beasly again for backup pf
battier-we'll see how wesley johnson does
budinger<brewer
lowry<ridnour

That's arguable. And really? You're assuming a rookie Johnson is going to be more productive than Bat? Also where's Taylor?

I'd be really interested what stats those assertions are made from.

Are they written down in crayon and surrounded by stick figure drawings, perchance?

moofs wrote:I'd be really interested what stats those assertions are made from.

Are they written down in crayon and surrounded by stick figure drawings, perchance?

i didnt want to be a dbag troll , the david kahn reference was good.... but darko isnt better than brad miller, i didnt realize i was lookin at millers playoff stats, my fault. but

flynn~~lowry ~ ~ beasley battier ~ ~ webster budinger
13.5 ~ ~9.1 ~ ~ ~ 14.8 ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ 9.4 ~ ~ 8.9 ~ pts
2.4 ~ ~3.6 ~ ~ ~ 6.4 ~ ~ 4.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ 3.3 ~ ~ 3.0 ~ rbnds
4.4 ~ ~4.5 ~ ~ ~ 1.3 ~ ~ 2.4 ~ ~ ~ ~ .8 ~ ~ 1.2 ~ assists

i think theyre all argueable..... im just the contradictor..... i suppose being the rebuttle to the houston fan is bein a troll? so my bad

pumunga wrote:

moofs wrote:I'd be really interested what stats those assertions are made from.

Are they written down in crayon and surrounded by stick figure drawings, perchance?

i didnt want to be a dbag troll , the david kahn reference was good.... but darko isnt better than brad miller, i didnt realize i was lookin at millers playoff stats, my fault. but

flynn~~lowry ~ ~ beasley battier ~ ~ webster budinger
13.5 ~ ~9.1 ~ ~ ~ 14.8 ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ 9.4 ~ ~ 8.9 ~ pts
2.4 ~ ~3.6 ~ ~ ~ 6.4 ~ ~ 4.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ 3.3 ~ ~ 3.0 ~ rbnds
4.4 ~ ~4.5 ~ ~ ~ 1.3 ~ ~ 2.4 ~ ~ ~ ~ .8 ~ ~ 1.2 ~ assists

i think theyre all argueable..... im just the contradictor..... i suppose being the rebuttle to the houston fan is bein a troll? so my bad

And yet a Lowry-Taylor-Budinger-Hill-Jeffries lineup had a better winning % than the Wolves.

lol didnt know the gloves were off

pumunga wrote:

moofs wrote:I'd be really interested what stats those assertions are made from.

Are they written down in crayon and surrounded by stick figure drawings, perchance?

i didnt want to be a dbag troll , the david kahn reference was good.... but darko isnt better than brad miller, i didnt realize i was lookin at millers playoff stats, my fault. but

flynn~~lowry ~ ~ beasley battier ~ ~ webster budinger
13.5 ~ ~9.1 ~ ~ ~ 14.8 ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ 9.4 ~ ~ 8.9 ~ pts
2.4 ~ ~3.6 ~ ~ ~ 6.4 ~ ~ 4.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ 3.3 ~ ~ 3.0 ~ rbnds
4.4 ~ ~4.5 ~ ~ ~ 1.3 ~ ~ 2.4 ~ ~ ~ ~ .8 ~ ~ 1.2 ~ assists

i think theyre all argueable..... im just the contradictor..... i suppose being the rebuttle to the houston fan is bein a troll? so my bad

Flynn put up those numbers as a starter; Lowry as a bench player.
Beasley may have had better numbers, but ask ANY GM who's the better defender or who has better intangibles. Guess what: they'll say Battier, 30 times out of 30.
Webster-Budinger? Again, Webster was a starter most of the year, Budinger was a rookie off the bench.

Long story short: the three guys you listed underachieved; ours have a history of overachieving.

Of course, problem with Beasley is unless he starts putting up 30/15 seasons, anything he does will be an underachievement.

pumunga wrote:i suppose being the rebuttle to the houston fan is bein a troll? so my bad

No not as long as there is merit to what you're saying.

Optimism Prime wrote:Of course, problem with Beasley is unless he starts putting up 30/15 seasons, anything he does will be an underachievement.

Yeah i must agree with you on this one. I think he'll be compared to Kevin Durant being his successor as Big 12 POY. Too bad for him.