ImageImage

Lakers and Rockets deal

Moderators: ken6199, TMU

LakerEric
Ballboy
Posts: 27
And1: 0
Joined: May 08, 2011

Lakers and Rockets deal 

Post#1 » by LakerEric » Thu Dec 15, 2011 6:01 am

I still think the Lakers and Rockets could make a deal for Gasol, giving the Rockets a center with Patterson or Morris at PF. I wanted your insight as to this deal:

Rockets deal Lowry and Scola to the Lakers for Gasol and a number one in 2012. Basically, you are getting back two number ones from the first deal you made and also keeping Martin. The obvious difference is the substitution of Lowry for Dragic. Please let me know what you think. Thanks.
User avatar
Teckon
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,206
And1: 30
Joined: Jan 09, 2006

Re: Lakers and Rockets deal 

Post#2 » by Teckon » Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:49 am

LakerEric wrote:I still think the Lakers and Rockets could make a deal for Gasol, giving the Rockets a center with Patterson or Morris at PF. I wanted your insight as to this deal:

Rockets deal Lowry and Scola to the Lakers for Gasol and a number one in 2012. Basically, you are getting back two number ones from the first deal you made and also keeping Martin. The obvious difference is the substitution of Lowry for Dragic. Please let me know what you think. Thanks.



The Rocket Management see higher value in Lowry than Martin. But LA throwing a the Mavs pick and Rockets keeping the Knick pick may add some balance to the trade. The issue is the original trade with Scola and Martin provide additional cap space for Rockets to sign either Nene or Marc Gasol (bigger offer than 58 million). Now they had signed with other teams, there is less motivation to do such trade.
texasholdem
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,578
And1: 404
Joined: Feb 11, 2005

Re: Lakers and Rockets deal 

Post#3 » by texasholdem » Thu Dec 15, 2011 9:45 am

How about some much needed youth for the Lakers instead?

Gasol, Artest, 1st rounder to Rockets

Jonny Flynn, Courtney Lee, Patrick Patterson, Jordan Hill, Hasheem Thabeet, Terrence Williams and Marqus Blakely to the Lakers

http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=7rrgc7g

Rockets (* free agent signings)
F: Ron Artest, Marcus Morris
F: Luis Scola, Carl Landry* or Jason Smith*
C: Pau Gasol, Kyrylo Fesenko*, Marcus Cousin
G: Kyle Lowry, Goran Dragic, Ish Smith*
G: Kevin Martin, Chase Budinger, Jeremy Lin

Lakers
F: Matt Barnes, Terrence Williams, Luke Walton, Jason Kapono
F: Patrick Patterson, Josh McRoberts, Derrick Caracter
C: Andrew Bynum, Jordan Hill, Hasheem Thabeet
G: Jonny Flynn, Derek Fisher, Steve Blake
G: Kobe Bryant, Courtney Lee
Harden is still a work-in-progress. He can score, but he can't help his teammate that much - Yao Ming
User avatar
H-town
Senior
Posts: 555
And1: 17
Joined: Jul 28, 2009

Re: Lakers and Rockets deal 

Post#4 » by H-town » Thu Dec 15, 2011 10:16 am

Lowry is untouchable for a Gasol deal.
Image
YoungMoney23
Starter
Posts: 2,278
And1: 138
Joined: May 06, 2007
Location: Chandler, Arizona
         

Re: Lakers and Rockets deal 

Post#5 » by YoungMoney23 » Thu Dec 15, 2011 10:47 am

Artest has absolutely no value any more and I doubt our management want him back
A Blog on the unsolved - http://coldcasefiles.wordpress.com/
User avatar
moofs
General Manager
Posts: 8,077
And1: 537
Joined: Apr 17, 2006
Location: "if the warriors win the title this season ill tattoo their logo in my di ck" -- 000001
Contact:

Re: Lakers and Rockets deal 

Post#6 » by moofs » Thu Dec 15, 2011 1:56 pm

No value? Of course there's value! Who WOULDN'T want to buy World Peace?
Morey 2020.

Q:How are they experts when they're always wrong?
A:Ask a stock market analyst or your financial advisor
rocketseagles07
Junior
Posts: 366
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 10, 2011

Re: Lakers and Rockets deal 

Post#7 » by rocketseagles07 » Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:29 pm

First of all we want to keep Lowry and why would the lakers downgrade at the pf position for a starting PG who is not a star?
Image
LakerEric
Ballboy
Posts: 27
And1: 0
Joined: May 08, 2011

Re: Lakers and Rockets deal 

Post#8 » by LakerEric » Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:54 pm

rocketseagles07 wrote:First of all we want to keep Lowry and why would the lakers downgrade at the pf position for a starting PG who is not a star?
[quote="rocketseagles07"]

Well, Lowry is a massive upgrade at PG. Scola is less of a dowgrade at the PF than Lowry is an upgrade at the PG. Plus, Lakers get younger and open the middle a bit more for Bynum. The question is does Houston value Lowry too much to do it. Or do they like Dragic enough to risk trading a solid PG but one that will never, as you said, be a star.
texasholdem
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,578
And1: 404
Joined: Feb 11, 2005

Re: Lakers and Rockets deal 

Post#9 » by texasholdem » Thu Dec 15, 2011 3:48 pm

He said Lowry is not a star not never will be a star.
It would be tough for Rockets fans to lose Hayes, Scola and Lowry in the same offseason.
Gasol has said he doesn't want to be here anyway.
Harden is still a work-in-progress. He can score, but he can't help his teammate that much - Yao Ming
User avatar
Mr. E
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,291
And1: 6,510
Joined: Apr 15, 2006
Location: Defending Planet Earth with a Jet-Pack & a Ray-Gun!
       

Re: Lakers and Rockets deal 

Post#10 » by Mr. E » Thu Dec 15, 2011 3:54 pm

As has been mentioned already, the point of trying to get Gasol would have been to pair him with his brother or Nene. Since that can't happen now there is no point in making that trade (especially sending Lowry out).

texasholdem...oy vey! You really want to trade everything we have, don't you??? :lol:
"A fanatic is one who can't change their mind and won't change the subject."
- Winston Churchill
texasholdem
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,578
And1: 404
Joined: Feb 11, 2005

Re: Lakers and Rockets deal 

Post#11 » by texasholdem » Thu Dec 15, 2011 4:16 pm

Mr. E wrote:As has been mentioned already, the point of trying to get Gasol would have been to pair him with his brother or Nene. Since that can't happen now there is no point in making that trade (especially sending Lowry out).

texasholdem...oy vey! You really want to trade everything we have, don't you??? :lol:


I don't want to trade Lowry. I think a Scola/Gasol frontline would work well together actually.

Whoever said Ron Artest has no value anymore...the Lakers wouldn't have beaten the Celtics in 2010 without him [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-mT99HCFFI[/youtube]
Harden is still a work-in-progress. He can score, but he can't help his teammate that much - Yao Ming
User avatar
Kal El
Rookie
Posts: 1,141
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: Lakers and Rockets deal 

Post#12 » by Kal El » Thu Dec 15, 2011 5:02 pm

moofs wrote:No value? Of course there's value! Who WOULDN'T want to buy World Peace?


nice
BSardogan
Banned User
Posts: 3
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 17, 2011

Re: Lakers and Rockets deal 

Post#13 » by BSardogan » Thu Dec 15, 2011 5:34 pm

texasholdem wrote:
Mr. E wrote:As has been mentioned already, the point of trying to get Gasol would have been to pair him with his brother or Nene. Since that can't happen now there is no point in making that trade (especially sending Lowry out).

texasholdem...oy vey! You really want to trade everything we have, don't you??? :lol:


I don't want to trade Lowry. I think a Scola/Gasol frontline would work well together actually.

Whoever said Ron Artest has no value anymore...the Lakers wouldn't have beaten the Celtics in 2010 without him [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-mT99HCFFI[/youtube]


If that's your strongest argument, a random clutch three he made over 1.5 years ago, even Zydrunas Ilgauskas would have a positive trading value. :(
User avatar
jwise44
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 16,626
And1: 9,351
Joined: Jan 07, 2010
Location: Denver
         

Re: Lakers and Rockets deal 

Post#14 » by jwise44 » Thu Dec 15, 2011 5:56 pm

Mwp is a myth now. Even a few years ago with us he was overrated he's slower and his man d has been steadily declining... He still has some good defensive performances but it isn't even close to an every night occurrence. And he's still an idiot
User avatar
jwise44
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 16,626
And1: 9,351
Joined: Jan 07, 2010
Location: Denver
         

Re: Lakers and Rockets deal 

Post#15 » by jwise44 » Thu Dec 15, 2011 5:57 pm

O and as to the ops trade hell no! It won't help us now and we won't give up Lowry. Best to trade Kmart and Scola for picks and youth in my opinion
texasholdem
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,578
And1: 404
Joined: Feb 11, 2005

Re: Lakers and Rockets deal 

Post#16 » by texasholdem » Thu Dec 15, 2011 6:22 pm

BSardogan wrote:
texasholdem wrote:
Mr. E wrote:As has been mentioned already, the point of trying to get Gasol would have been to pair him with his brother or Nene. Since that can't happen now there is no point in making that trade (especially sending Lowry out).

texasholdem...oy vey! You really want to trade everything we have, don't you??? :lol:


I don't want to trade Lowry. I think a Scola/Gasol frontline would work well together actually.

Whoever said Ron Artest has no value anymore...the Lakers wouldn't have beaten the Celtics in 2010 without him [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-mT99HCFFI[/youtube]


If that's your strongest argument, a random clutch three he made over 1.5 years ago, even Zydrunas Ilgauskas would have a positive trading value. :(


Random? that 3 was in the final minute of Game 7 of an NBA Finals. in a game where Kobe shot 6 for 24. He also hit another clutch 3 vs Phoenix that playoff run. He's not the player he once was but he is still a starting caliber SF.
Harden is still a work-in-progress. He can score, but he can't help his teammate that much - Yao Ming
User avatar
moofs
General Manager
Posts: 8,077
And1: 537
Joined: Apr 17, 2006
Location: "if the warriors win the title this season ill tattoo their logo in my di ck" -- 000001
Contact:

Re: Lakers and Rockets deal 

Post#17 » by moofs » Thu Dec 15, 2011 9:34 pm

I love that basketball reference updated his name http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... sro01.html

He's decidedly average, but average is usually good enough to start.
Hard to believe given his .400fg%, but he rebounds pretty well and thiefs like a madman on crazy pills.
Morey 2020.

Q:How are they experts when they're always wrong?
A:Ask a stock market analyst or your financial advisor
kam_soluusar
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,647
And1: 112
Joined: Apr 21, 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:
   

Re: Lakers and Rockets deal 

Post#18 » by kam_soluusar » Thu Dec 15, 2011 11:13 pm

We can't upgrade if we are going to suck this year. I hear tha Bonzi Wells is signing a non-guaranteed deal with Minnesota.

Bring back the Bozo.

In other news Landry has re-signed with NO. So my dreams of a Rockets return are , well, ruined.

2011-2012 the time to do a Botched Apollo mission. (We explode spectacularly, clean up the debris, and start over!)

Martin and Scola will probably get traded at the deadline. When contenders are looking for that extra bit of firepower to push them over the bubble.
Image
"I don't think Michael had to retire for us to get the spotlight, because when you win, it commands attention."
Hakeem Olajuwon
User avatar
Joseph17
RealGM
Posts: 10,430
And1: 529
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Location: New York
   

Re: Lakers and Rockets deal 

Post#19 » by Joseph17 » Fri Dec 16, 2011 6:26 am

LakerEric wrote:I still think the Lakers and Rockets could make a deal for Gasol, giving the Rockets a center with Patterson or Morris at PF. I wanted your insight as to this deal:

Rockets deal Lowry and Scola to the Lakers for Gasol and a number one in 2012. Basically, you are getting back two number ones from the first deal you made and also keeping Martin. The obvious difference is the substitution of Lowry for Dragic. Please let me know what you think. Thanks.

If the Rockets want Gasol that badly they should just offer Kev and Scola for him. I think that trade would make the Lakers a more complete team because Scola would go to his natural position (I know that he played pf here, but he was next to Chuck) and they could start Martin instead of Fisher.
YoungMoney23
Starter
Posts: 2,278
And1: 138
Joined: May 06, 2007
Location: Chandler, Arizona
         

Re: Lakers and Rockets deal 

Post#20 » by YoungMoney23 » Fri Dec 16, 2011 4:31 pm

Joseph17 wrote:
LakerEric wrote:I still think the Lakers and Rockets could make a deal for Gasol, giving the Rockets a center with Patterson or Morris at PF. I wanted your insight as to this deal:

Rockets deal Lowry and Scola to the Lakers for Gasol and a number one in 2012. Basically, you are getting back two number ones from the first deal you made and also keeping Martin. The obvious difference is the substitution of Lowry for Dragic. Please let me know what you think. Thanks.

If the Rockets want Gasol that badly they should just offer Kev and Scola for him. I think that trade would make the Lakers a more complete team because Scola would go to his natural position (I know that he played pf here, but he was next to Chuck) and they could start Martin instead of Fisher.



Start Martin instead of Fisher? Even at his current age Fisher is probably still better defensively than Martin. Who would start at the point then? Kobe? Greatness aside, He's way too selfish to play point guard. It's bad enough watching games where he shoots the lakers out of the game when he has an off night, this would just give him an excuse to do it more often...
A Blog on the unsolved - http://coldcasefiles.wordpress.com/

Return to Houston Rockets