OT: Patrick Patterson
OT: Patrick Patterson
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,957
- And1: 760
- Joined: Aug 16, 2012
- Location: Toronto
OT: Patrick Patterson
Raptor fan here. PP was only with SAC for 1 season while you guys had a chance to see him for almost 3 seasons and would probably do a better evaluation on him
What's your take on Patrick Patterson and what's his ceiling?
What's your take on Patrick Patterson and what's his ceiling?
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
- zapatasblood
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,629
- And1: 580
- Joined: Jul 03, 2010
- Location: Stank-O-Dena
-
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
As the ceiling thing goes what you see is what you get. He is not going to get better.
Light beer is for pregnant woman and children
"How sweet it is!" -Gene Peterson
And you never once paid for drugs Not once
"How sweet it is!" -Gene Peterson
And you never once paid for drugs Not once
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,333
- And1: 104
- Joined: Nov 08, 2005
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
Runs the floor, good mid range J, can be a double digit scorer, pedestrian rebounder, did not have many sets ran for him and he never showed a post game. However, his interior D is okay.
He is a poorer version of a prime Brandon Bass.
He is a poorer version of a prime Brandon Bass.
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
- MaxRider
- RealGM
- Posts: 44,473
- And1: 5,805
- Joined: Jun 08, 2005
- Location: Choke City
-
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
good help defender
not a very good one on one defender
used to be deadly on mid range jumper
but not as good after first season
develop 3 pts shots after 2 years
bad defensive rebounder but a good offensive rebounder
not a very good one on one defender
used to be deadly on mid range jumper
but not as good after first season
develop 3 pts shots after 2 years
bad defensive rebounder but a good offensive rebounder
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
- LarsV8
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,130
- And1: 5,433
- Joined: Dec 13, 2009
-
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
He has basketball smarts down so he is usually in the right place/time to be a very solid defender specifically on the PnR. His lack of size and speed are the only thing from stopping him from being an elite defender.
We saw different Pattersons in his time here. In the beggining his midrange set shot from the elbows were practically automatic. Midrange shots were not in the Rocket playbook, so he completely changed his game into a stretch four and developed a very accurate three point shot. This leads me to believe he is very coachable and do what the team needs of him.
His rebounding and post game were mediocre. Patterson is a serviceable player, but limited in upside.
We saw different Pattersons in his time here. In the beggining his midrange set shot from the elbows were practically automatic. Midrange shots were not in the Rocket playbook, so he completely changed his game into a stretch four and developed a very accurate three point shot. This leads me to believe he is very coachable and do what the team needs of him.
His rebounding and post game were mediocre. Patterson is a serviceable player, but limited in upside.

Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,759
- And1: 647
- Joined: Oct 09, 2005
- Location: BBG Nation unite!
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
He was a solid BBG with range out to 3pt line. Dependable defender but a crap rebounder. Has a tendency to turn invisible when his shots are missing.
Good role player.
Good role player.
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,578
- And1: 404
- Joined: Feb 11, 2005
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
Terrence Jones is already a better player
Harden is still a work-in-progress. He can score, but he can't help his teammate that much - Yao Ming
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
- MaxRider
- RealGM
- Posts: 44,473
- And1: 5,805
- Joined: Jun 08, 2005
- Location: Choke City
-
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
texasholdem wrote:Terrence Jones is already a better player
pat pat is better shooter
t-jones is better slasher and rebounder and blocker
1 vs 3
okay t-jones is better
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,243
- And1: 3,369
- Joined: Jun 04, 2007
-
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
Yeah I like Patrick Patterson, he's a solid player. He's exactly the kind of guy you can have coming off the bench for 15-20 minutes to provide some mid-range/outside shooting.
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,696
- And1: 116
- Joined: May 12, 2006
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
Yeah gotta agree with Spolgar he's a poor man's Brandon Bass.
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,748
- And1: 355
- Joined: Mar 07, 2009
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
he's part of the rare power forward blend where he can get 19 pts with 1 rebound
good backup pf. he can defend, score, stretch, postt up, rebound, agile, sets good picks. he can do a lotta things but he's very average and inconsistent at them. added a 3pt game afte rhouston.
good backup pf. he can defend, score, stretch, postt up, rebound, agile, sets good picks. he can do a lotta things but he's very average and inconsistent at them. added a 3pt game afte rhouston.
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
- Aaron Brooks
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,148
- And1: 629
- Joined: Jan 14, 2008
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson

baki wrote:Harden is essentially a very good role player, he's not a franchise player.
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,072
- And1: 794
- Joined: Apr 06, 2006
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
Role player, like most role players, can be good in the right situation, not so good in other situation.
generally he doesn't have the best athleticism in the world though. has trouble against bigger PF and not fast enough to guard wings, pretty solid understanding of rotations on both ends.
statistically his problem is that he rebounds like a small forward. his offensive game is heavily jump shot reliant so if he's cold he's virtually worthless, but he can get hot at times, and is pretty good against smaller lineups without great wing penetraters.
He has his uses.
generally he doesn't have the best athleticism in the world though. has trouble against bigger PF and not fast enough to guard wings, pretty solid understanding of rotations on both ends.
statistically his problem is that he rebounds like a small forward. his offensive game is heavily jump shot reliant so if he's cold he's virtually worthless, but he can get hot at times, and is pretty good against smaller lineups without great wing penetraters.
He has his uses.
The river of time wash away all heroes
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
- moofs
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,077
- And1: 537
- Joined: Apr 17, 2006
- Location: "if the warriors win the title this season ill tattoo their logo in my di ck" -- 000001
- Contact:
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
Aaron Brooks wrote:
See, but what if he's talking to someone that has a girlfriend?
Worse, what if he's talking to someone that's married?
Is Patrick really all about breaking up families like that?
Does he just enjoy rampant hypocrisy?
Does he just not see any value in rebounding?
Does he see value in rebounding, but have no interest in ramping up his efforts in the area?
He should really consider his challenges a bit more thoroughly.
Think of your career, Patrick. Not to mention the kittens. Think of the kittens, too.
Morey 2020.
Q:How are they experts when they're always wrong?
A:Ask a stock market analyst or your financial advisor
Q:How are they experts when they're always wrong?
A:Ask a stock market analyst or your financial advisor
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
- inquisitive
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,095
- And1: 2,867
- Joined: Aug 27, 2010
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
serviceable is all i can say
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,748
- And1: 355
- Joined: Mar 07, 2009
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
moofs wrote:Aaron Brooks wrote:
tinypic.com/6p0sy0.jp
See, but what if he's talking to someone that has a girlfriend?
Worse, what if he's talking to someone that's married?
Is Patrick really all about breaking up families like that?
Does he just enjoy rampant hypocrisy?
Does he just not see any value in rebounding?
Does he see value in rebounding, but have no interest in ramping up his efforts in the area?
He should really consider his challenges a bit more thoroughly.
Think of your career, Patrick. Not to mention the kittens. Think of the kittens, too.
after having a 19pt/1rebound game, he should've preserved his honor and go ham on rebounding in practice and on his own time. average 10 a game. make everyone forget about that game. i would've been like "what game are u talking about?"
good thing no one knows about that game he had
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
- M4P
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,408
- And1: 1,640
- Joined: Aug 29, 2008
-
Re: OT: Patrick Patterson
Undersized and tends to fall in love with his 3 pt shot. His ceiling is a bench player.
HoopsMalone wrote:Shaq would still have value... But to think he'd be anywhere near as dominant as he was in the post era is just ridiculous
jahlil okafor has some of the best post moves in the last 30 years and the dude can't even get on the floor