Page 1 of 1
Would you rather have
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2015 11:36 am
by Roddy B for 3
Howard
Jones
Ariza
Harden
Beverley
Or
Asik
Jones
Parsons
Harden
Dragic
?
I know which one would be more exciting to watch
Re: Would you rather have
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2015 11:48 am
by Br0ken_Sp0ke
Not sure what the point of this thread is, but the current team is better than your hypothetical one.
Re: Would you rather have
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2015 5:38 pm
by 000001
Roddy B for 3 wrote:Howard
Jones
Ariza
Harden
Beverley
Or
Asik
Jones
Parsons
Harden
Dragic
?
I know which one would be more exciting to watch
team 1
howard>dragic
parsons=ariza
asik=beverly
not by much pretty much same level teams
Re: Would you rather have
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2015 8:13 pm
by Mr. E
Why Jones instead of Motiejunas?
Re: Would you rather have
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 7:13 pm
by texasholdem
What if we had lost the Howard sweepstakes in 2013?
and signed Paul Millsap and Brandon Jennings with that $20 million in cap space instead?
Would we be better off with Asik/Millsap/Parsons/Jennings/Harden
than Howard/Jonestijunas/Ariza/Beverley/Harden
Re: Would you rather have
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 7:48 pm
by jwise44
Isn't ASIK having a terrible year?
I ask this as a huge fan of him
Re: Would you rather have
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 7:52 pm
by texasholdem
jwise44 wrote:Isn't ASIK having a terrible year?
Better than last year. 10.2 rpg in only 25.7 mpg is pretty good. Shot blocking is down but Davis gets a lot of those.
Re: Would you rather have
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2015 6:42 pm
by quatin
Roddy B for 3 wrote:Howard
Jones
Ariza
Harden
Beverley
Or
Asik
Jones
Parsons
Harden
Dragic
?
I know which one would be more exciting to watch
#1 has way better defense than #2. A Dragic + Harden offense is less versatile than a Harden + Howard offense, especially with stone hands Asik in the paint. I think #1 is much more preferable.
Re: Would you rather have
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2015 7:14 pm
by texasholdem
quatin wrote:Roddy B for 3 wrote:Howard
Jones
Ariza
Harden
Beverley
Or
Asik
Jones
Parsons
Harden
Dragic
?
I know which one would be more exciting to watch
#1 has way better defense than #2. A Dragic + Harden offense is less versatile than a Harden + Howard offense, especially with stone hands Asik in the paint. I think #1 is much more preferable.
Harden + Asik + Parsons + Beverley + Garcia/Lin = lost to Thunder in 6 games. Eliminated in 1st round
Harden + Howard + Parsons + Beverley + Jones/Asik = lost to Blazers in 6 games. Eliminated in 1st round
We need a second ball handler who can create other than Harden
Re: Would you rather have
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2015 7:36 pm
by quatin
texasholdem wrote:Harden + Asik + Parsons + Beverley + Garcia/Lin = lost to Thunder in 6 games. Eliminated in 1st round
Harden + Howard + Parsons + Beverley + Jones/Asik = lost to Blazers in 6 games. Eliminated in 1st round
We need a second ball handler who can create other than Harden
We need to play defense. Our problem was never offense.
2012-2013 #2 Offense Regular season/#4 Offense Post season #26 Defense regular season/#15 Defense Post season (2nd to last)
2013-2014 #2 Offense Regular season/#1 Offense Post season #21 Defense regular season/#16 Defense Post season (last)
Howard/Beverly defense is better than Dragic/Asik. Plus, you can still post up Howard. It's ugly, but it's there. Combine that with Ariza over Parsons, I think it's a pretty easy choice.
Re: Would you rather have
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2015 7:52 pm
by Nebula1
Dragic
Harden
Ariza
Jones
Howard
Bev
Brewer
Papa
DMO
Capela
That's what I want it to look like.