From the same LA Times reporter who reported many of the details of the CP 3 trade.
Remember when no one wanted to play with Harden?

Mr. E wrote:Depends on the price tag, but it would be nice not to have him killing our team for a change.
MaxRider wrote:I rather give that kind of money to Millsap. I'm happy with Gordon as backup SG
K_chile22 wrote:MaxRider wrote:I rather give that kind of money to Millsap. I'm happy with Gordon as backup SG
Milsap will cost a LOT more than that, but those guys would be needed to make it work, and I'd rather have him too. This is more of a plan B or C
MaxRider wrote:K_chile22 wrote:MaxRider wrote:I rather give that kind of money to Millsap. I'm happy with Gordon as backup SG
Milsap will cost a LOT more than that, but those guys would be needed to make it work, and I'd rather have him too. This is more of a plan B or C
Redick is more like plan D
with Dekker and Harrell gone
we need to improve our PF position first
K_chile22 wrote:MaxRider wrote:K_chile22 wrote:Milsap will cost a LOT more than that, but those guys would be needed to make it work, and I'd rather have him too. This is more of a plan B or C
Redick is more like plan D
with Dekker and Harrell gone
we need to improve our PF position first
They can use the MLE there for a PJ Tucker/ maybe 2Pat/ James Johnson to fill out the four spot
MaxRider wrote:K_chile22 wrote:MaxRider wrote:Redick is more like plan D
with Dekker and Harrell gone
we need to improve our PF position first
They can use the MLE there for a PJ Tucker/ maybe 2Pat/ James Johnson to fill out the four spot
PJ Tucker is SF/SG
Morey is thinking to use part of MLE to sign Zhou Qi
so I'm afraid his plan A isn't using MLE for PF
K_chile22 wrote:MaxRider wrote:K_chile22 wrote:They can use the MLE there for a PJ Tucker/ maybe 2Pat/ James Johnson to fill out the four spot
PJ Tucker is SF/SG
Morey is thinking to use part of MLE to sign Zhou Qi
so I'm afraid his plan A isn't using MLE for PF
Tucker is much better at the four than he is anywhere else. HE's short but the dude is a bull.
They'll also just be using 816k of the MLE on Zhou, 3 years starting at 7.6 mil is more than fair for him.
MaxRider wrote:K_chile22 wrote:MaxRider wrote:PJ Tucker is SF/SG
Morey is thinking to use part of MLE to sign Zhou Qi
so I'm afraid his plan A isn't using MLE for PF
Tucker is much better at the four than he is anywhere else. HE's short but the dude is a bull.
They'll also just be using 816k of the MLE on Zhou, 3 years starting at 7.6 mil is more than fair for him.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/t/tuckepj01.html#all_advanced_pbp
19% of his time at PF last season and you want him to be backup PF?
BTW that's less than Ariza 21% at PF
K_chile22 wrote:MaxRider wrote:K_chile22 wrote:Tucker is much better at the four than he is anywhere else. HE's short but the dude is a bull.
They'll also just be using 816k of the MLE on Zhou, 3 years starting at 7.6 mil is more than fair for him.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/t/tuckepj01.html#all_advanced_pbp
19% of his time at PF last season and you want him to be backup PF?
BTW that's less than Ariza 21% at PF
a fourth of his time is not insignificant. On a team that doesn't already have two very good fours (PatPat, Ibaka, suns had their two rookies and Dudley) he would've gotten more. Trust me, if he were a rockets he'd be the backup 4 as well as backup 3. Like Dekker was
MaxRider wrote:K_chile22 wrote:MaxRider wrote:http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/t/tuckepj01.html#all_advanced_pbp
19% of his time at PF last season and you want him to be backup PF?
BTW that's less than Ariza 21% at PF
a fourth of his time is not insignificant. On a team that doesn't already have two very good fours (PatPat, Ibaka, suns had their two rookies and Dudley) he would've gotten more. Trust me, if he were a rockets he'd be the backup 4 as well as backup 3. Like Dekker was
19% is more like fifth
anyway we hardly agree on anything
texasholdem wrote:Trade Eric Gordon for Paul George then sign Redick. EG is from Indiana so the Pacers could be interested.
texasholdem wrote:Morey is gaining a bad reputation it seems. This is what Redick said about the rockets: "(It didn't work out) – some of it was numbers and some of it was other factors like relocating the family and – I hate to say this – but you never know with Daryl and how he operates. A three-year deal could really be a six-month deal if you get dealt at the trade deadline for a superstar as part of a package of six."
K_chile22 wrote:texasholdem wrote:Morey is gaining a bad reputation it seems. This is what Redick said about the rockets: "(It didn't work out) – some of it was numbers and some of it was other factors like relocating the family and – I hate to say this – but you never know with Daryl and how he operates. A three-year deal could really be a six-month deal if you get dealt at the trade deadline for a superstar as part of a package of six."
That's not the reason he didn't come though, it's because he thought they would offer him four years before FA started, then they offered three. He would've come if they were willing to give him a fourth year. Says so in the pod that quote came from
texasholdem wrote:K_chile22 wrote:texasholdem wrote:Morey is gaining a bad reputation it seems. This is what Redick said about the rockets: "(It didn't work out) – some of it was numbers and some of it was other factors like relocating the family and – I hate to say this – but you never know with Daryl and how he operates. A three-year deal could really be a six-month deal if you get dealt at the trade deadline for a superstar as part of a package of six."
That's not the reason he didn't come though, it's because he thought they would offer him four years before FA started, then they offered three. He would've come if they were willing to give him a fourth year. Says so in the pod that quote came from
So you're not the least bit concerned about his "how he operates" part of the quote and if other players feel the same way?