Page 1 of 1
man rockets really had a good draft
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:34 am
by tmacformvp06
Landry and brooks may have saved our season
landry looks like a beast
brooks need my pt
Re: man rockets really had a good draft
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:35 am
by jzmagik
tmacformvp06 wrote:Landry and brooks may have saved our season
landry looks like a beast
brooks need my pt
Couldn't agree more, these guys are gems.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:41 am
by A.J.
thank you seattle for trading landry to us for practically nothing.
and aaron brooks is gonn a have a nice future for us
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:44 am
by Guy986
I agree. Tell me how many playoff contenders are playing 3 rookies in their rotation?
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 8:35 am
by Illuminati
Hey fellas, does DunleavyJr post in this forum?
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:01 am
by dontel
Illuminati wrote:Hey fellas, does DunleavyJr post in this forum?
yeah why?
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 3:01 pm
by Crackfool
Let's not get carried away. Brooks and Landry have impressed, but they haven't saved our season yet.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:43 pm
by MaxRider
Landry still need to work on his defense
Brooks is not playing well as a PG
too early to praise them
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 6:04 pm
by Shabi__5
MaxRider wrote:Landry still need to work on his defense
Brooks is not playing well as a PG
too early to praise them
It's true , if Brooks doesn't improve more in the next stretch of games we should look for another pg.
There is no way Alston should be playing 40 minutes again , he is the best we got but a lot of time he is not good enough and we need another guy.
Wehn Brooks plays well great , but when he struggles we can't rely on him or ion Rafer to play 40 minutes a game again , and it will be painful to see Luther at the point.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 6:13 pm
by bubba
i agree they have been a spark off the bench. i can see landry maybe starting in a few years. once he fully understands the game and watches his fouls he could start. i still remember how so many people were ticked that we drafted another pg. thank goodness we did.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 6:21 pm
by MaxRider
Shabi__5 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
It's true , if Brooks doesn't improve more in the next stretch of games we should look for another pg.
There is no way Alston should be playing 40 minutes again , he is the best we got but a lot of time he is not good enough and we need another guy.
Wehn Brooks plays well great , but when he struggles we can't rely on him or ion Rafer to play 40 minutes a game again , and it will be painful to see Luther at the point.
Brooks is playing well when he's playing SG (with Alston at PG)
lot of people just look at stats and think he played well as a PG
you actually have to watch the game to see Alston is running the team
we definitely don't need undersized SG
Szczerbiak took advantage of that yesterday immediately
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 6:47 pm
by BaYBaller
MaxRider wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Brooks is playing well when he's playing SG (with Alston at PG)
lot of people just look at stats and think he played well as a PG
you actually have to watch the game to see Alston is running the team
we definitely don't need undersized SG
Szczerbiak took advantage of that yesterday immediately
That's the funny thing to me. The PG in our current system doesn't really have to create anything (i.e. breaking down his man), they just have to call and/or identify the sets and run them. And in terms of the PG initiating the offense there is like maybe 3 major sets to remember... it's not hard.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:22 pm
by MaxRider
BaYBaller wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
That's the funny thing to me. The PG in our current system doesn't really have to create anything (i.e. breaking down his man), they just have to call and/or identify the sets and run them. And in terms of the PG initiating the offense there is like maybe 3 major sets to remember... it's not hard.
if it's not hard
i wonder why Francis, James, Head, Brooks can't do it better than Alston
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:46 pm
by BaYBaller
MaxRider wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
if it's not hard
i wonder why Francis, James, Head, Brooks can't do it better than Alston
That's why I found it funny, it's because they are actually that bad at it. But this isn't the only reason Alston gets minutes it's also because he's our best defender at the position by far.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 8:09 pm
by moofs
Or maybe Alston is just that good at it. If you don't need a real point guard in this system, why does everyone keep calling for Mike Bibby?
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 8:18 pm
by BaYBaller
moofs wrote:Or maybe Alston is just that good at it. If you don't need a real point guard in this system, why does everyone keep calling for Mike Bibby?
Alston can do it yeah, that and his defense is why he's starting. But if you think about it there are probably more PG's in the league who can do it than those who can't.
And I never said you don't need a real PG, I said you don't need one who creates, they just need to run the sets and of course not be a liability on defense (which Head and Brooks most certainly are).