Notice if you will that he ignores a LOT
JeromeSolomon wrote:Alston is shooting 39.3 percent from the floor, 32.9 percent on 3-pointers, and a ridiculous 64.7 percent from the foul line. His free throw percentage is 75th among guards in the Western Conference (153rd among guards league-wide) and is the worst for any starting guard in the conference.
Look at the shooting percentages of the point guards on the teams ahead of the Rockets in the Western Conference standings.
Chris Paul, New Orleans (48.4 percent). Steve Nash, Phoenix (51.9 percent, 48.2 on 3-pointers). Devin Harris, Dallas (48.3 percent). Anthony Carter (46.4 percent) or Allen Iverson (45.3 percent), Denver. Tony Parker, San Antonio (49.2 percent). Derek Fisher, Los Angeles (47.2 percent, 43.1 on 3-pointers). Baron Davis, Golden State (42.6 percent). Steve Blake, Portland (44.6 percent, 45.5 on 3-pointers). Deron Williams, Utah (51.7 percent).
Chris Paul
324-675 43-123
Devin Harris
187-387 25-70
- These guys all take a fairly small percentage of their shots from 3p range, shoot just a hair over 50% from 2p, right where alston was at until recently
Anthony Carter (46.4 percent) - Isn't shooting hardly any 3's to pull his percentages down. Shooting 90-188 from 2p range. The difference? Alston is called on to take more shots, and a high percentage of them from 3p range. They're currently equivalent at shooting 3's on the season, but Alston is
MUCH better at it for his career. Solomon is an idiot for bringing this guy up.
Tony Parker, San Antonio (49.2 percent).
Takes all his shots from 2p range, only shot 40 3p's on the season. If you think we're getting him, just try to offer San Antonio some kind of trade. Go ahead. Have fun!
Deron Williams - Almost as good as Nash as far as shooting goes in some respects. But he doesn't shoot as many 3's, which looks to me like he picks his spots more often. Possibly because he can't shoot as well if he isn't open? No knock on him for that small flaw, but if Nash can take that many more and still hit a better percentage, it would seem to me that he's just a better shooter.
Steve Nash - in a class of his own in the NBA as far as shooting goes.
Allen Iverson, Baron Davis - Are you suggesting we can't win without 3 allstars? That sounds like a problem with our other two stars more than a problem with our point guard. Try to get either one of them, too.
Derek Fisher - a much better 3p shooter than Alston (and a guy I would LOVE to get on this team, but it's not happening. Utah only let him go because of his daughter's condition, GState didn't need 18 guards)
Steve Blake - much better 3p shooter than Alston
The guys he names are nice and all, but then consider that to get one of those guys, you either have to pull them away from their teams (we tried to get Blake iirc and didn't pull it off, Carter, the only other acquirable trade option, would be a
horrible trade for us), or find someone with talents that are approximately equivalent to theirs through the draft or d-league. I've posted about this before. There's no way we're getting any all-stars without making a blockbuster trade (a rarity in the NBA amid good teams, not overly common among bad ones either), which leaves our best option as the draft. We picked up Brooks with our low draft pick and rolled the dice on James and Francis (admittedly a low probability dice roll on both, but it was worth taking for how much we gave up - i.e. practically nothing). What better do you want? There weren't, and aren't many options.
This team is going to go as Mac and Yao go. He pointed out the problems with them at the first of the article, then completely ignored that and jumped off the boat. He's just playing the crowd. He knows that his audience by-and-large doesn't like Alston, whether he actually thinks he's better than he says or not, knowing and playing to your audience is a key factor in being a good entertainer (which, have no doubt, is what sportswriters are).
This article is actually why I've been down on TMac so much lately. Notice that most of the teams those guys belong to are built around a big guy and a small guy (PF/C, SG/PG). Our equivalent to the small guy is TMac. If Alston is really the problem, TMac is the equivalent of those guys and should step through in Alston's stead. If he can't, that's a knock on him, not Alston, who is there to keep Mac from having to do EVERYTHING game in, game out, NOT to HAVE to be the guy in charge of the team at crunch time. If that's the case, then yes, we have a problem. A major one. And it's not Alston.
I'll remind you again, during and after last year's playoff series, I was yelling "WE CAN'T WIN WITH THESE GUYS". I'll give you a hint, I wasn't talking about role players.
Sometimes, you're just stuck, ok? The only answer at that point is time.