Page 1 of 2
Should landry get the start over scola as the season moves
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 5:35 am
by tmacformvp06
on
landry is the better offensive player more explosive. And it a great offensive rebounder. He just needs to work on his defense
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 5:37 am
by jzmagik
I think he should... at the very least, he needs to see more time on the court.
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 5:39 am
by TMU
Because Mutombo is strictly a low post player even though he's an offensive liability, we need someone who can play at the high post. Scola is definitely more expandable at the high post rather than Landry.
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 5:42 am
by Iggyemu
No. Scola is fine starting. I think though unless we play some huge team that Scola and Landry or Scola and Hayes should start. I don't like starting games with Mutombo. I mean yes our defense will suffer some but our offense will be better as shown tonight.
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 5:43 am
by Amel
NO, but Landry shoul def get more playing time. The guy will become an allstar.
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 5:46 am
by A.J.
no, but landry should get more increased minutes....we need his energy off the pine
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 6:01 am
by MaxRider
we need Landry energy off the bench
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 6:19 am
by dream34
We are what.. 23-3 with Scola in the starting lineup? Why would we change that?
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 6:51 am
by CJballa14
nah landry is perfect off the bench... hes a high energy, explosive spark for the team...
he does need more minutes... and scola/landry need to be on the court together more often...
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 8:02 am
by grond
Before he went down, he and Scola were pretty much splitting minutes evenly at the 4, with Scola starting and Landry finishing.
That's pretty much what they did tonight, except Landry's minutes were reduced a little since it was his first game back. Once the coaching staff figure his knee's ok, they'll probably go back to the 50/50 split with Landry off the bench but finishing - which is about right for this team I think.
Scola needs to find his J again. It was money for the majority of the streak, but seems to have deserted him lately.
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 8:05 am
by moofs
For now, Scola is the more rounded and polished player. I like our rotation as it is.
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 2:16 pm
by Shabi__5
No , Landry is great off the bench but I'd like us to finish games with Scola and Landry together.
Also play Landry with T-Mac as much as possible he will convert T-Mac's passes into dunks.
I love Landry I hope we can sign him long term for like 4 million a year.
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 4:00 pm
by Ksnyder18
I dont think so Landry is awesme off the bench, he brings great passion and energy. I would also do what Shabi said to play him with Tmac as much as possible, TMac finds his teamates but know one beisdes Landry dunks. The others miss the contested lay-uo or get blocked
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 6:54 pm
by MikGertso
CJballa14 wrote:nah landry is perfect off the bench... hes a high energy, explosive spark for the team...
he does need more minutes... and scola/landry need to be on the court together more often...
Correction. Scola/Landry/Harris combo......dangerous.
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:15 pm
by tisbee
Until Landry can defend Duncan,Stoudemire,Gasol,Boozer and West,Scola's starting.
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:07 pm
by Iggyemu
Scola can't defend any of those guys either. LOL.
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:24 pm
by HTown_TMac
Iggyemu wrote:Scola can't defend any of those guys either. LOL.
He needs to think about it...
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:43 am
by tha_rock220
Why are you guys so obsessed with the meanings of things like starters, 3rd options, life, etc??? Rick Adelman is an NBA level coach. He knows he has options at the 4 spot so if one of his guys is playing poorly I'm sure he'll bring in someone else. So keep the rotation like it is....or change it I don't care. But don't expect some special meaning to come with Landry being promoted to starter if he is because if he's playing poorly then Scola will still get the lion's share of the minutes that particular game. Chuck Hayes will be part of these considerations as well.
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 6:00 am
by moofs
No Rock, no! You have to have meaningless labels and functionless boxes for everything! That's just the way life works.
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:01 am
by grond
tha_rock220 wrote:Why are you guys so obsessed with the meanings of things like starters, 3rd options, life, etc??? Rick Adelman is an NBA level coach. He knows he has options at the 4 spot so if one of his guys is playing poorly I'm sure he'll bring in someone else. So keep the rotation like it is....or change it I don't care. But don't expect some special meaning to come with Landry being promoted to starter if he is because if he's playing poorly then Scola will still get the lion's share of the minutes that particular game. Chuck Hayes will be part of these considerations as well.
Wait wait. Rock, so you're saying ....
IT DOESN'T MATTER!
heh heh. Sorry. I just wanted to do that once. Won't happen again.