OT: Which NBA Legend would you start your franchise with?
OT: Which NBA Legend would you start your franchise with?
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,233
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 03, 2007
OT: Which NBA Legend would you start your franchise with?
If you were starting a team, and you could take any legend as a rookie and build your team around them, which one would you take?
- Texas Longhorns
- Banned User
- Posts: 4,005
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jan 08, 2008
- Location: Cockrell School of Engineering
- Contact:
- TMU
- Forum Mod - Rockets
- Posts: 30,188
- And1: 10,413
- Joined: Jan 02, 2005
- Location: O.R.
-
McGrady2Head wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Yeah I dont know, Russell was great, but he also had some STACKED teams when he played chamberlain. I think if your starting from scratch, chamberlain would be easier to build around.
That's a fair point. I'm not going to deny the fact that Russell played with some HOFers including Cousy, Heinsohn, Sharman, Ramsey, Sam Jones, K.C. Jones, and Havlicek. Who else am I missing?
However, based on today's HOF standards, Cousy, and Havlicek (and maybe Sharman and Sam Jones) would have been the only true HOFers. Guys like Heinsohn, Ramsey, and K.C. were inducted to the HOF as a result of playing alongside Russell. Let's not forget that the Celtics didn't win a championship prior to Russell's arrival and upon his departure. I mean, it wasn't until 74', when the Celtics won again, which was led by Havlicek.
I doubt that Wilt, Kareem or MJ could've filled Russell's shoes. The fact that he won 11 championships (8 straight), including 2 as a player/coach is simply astounding.
EDIT: I also chose MJ because his individual talent as a player can't be matched by any perimeter players that has/had played the game. History shows that it's rare to see a swingman dominate both ends of the court and lead his team to a championship. MJ didn't win twice or three times; he won six championships.
So yeah, Russell or MJ for me.
- TMACFORMVP
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 18,947
- And1: 161
- Joined: Jun 30, 2006
- Location: 9th Seed
Considering Duncan and Shaq are on that poll justifies that Hakeem should on it, since he's definitely on their level and arguably even better accounting his dominance on both ends of the floor.
Anyways, it'd be Wilt or Jordan for me. In today's rules seeing how a guy like Kobe can control the pace of the game throughout and singlehandedly win you games in 4th quarters, it'd be scary to think what prime MJ would be able to do in the no handchecks era. Then a guy like Wilt that can anchor your defense, and is arguably the most dominant offensive player to have ever played is real tough to choose from.
Then you look at the difference from their peers at the same position and the depth at that position
Wilt
Russell
Kareem
Hakeem
Shaq
Robinson
Moses
Duncan
(guys like Ewing as well)
or
Jordan
West
Kobe
(other swings like Havlicek, Erving, Drexler are there as well)
Seems like the big man depth is more than the actual DOMINANT wing depth. Give Jordan a second option and a bunch of good defenders, and I'd think they'd fare better than a team led by Wilt, especially considering there's more actual footage of Jordan and in the modern day era which is more geared towards perimeter play.
Then again I'm a sucker for a big man, so I'll take the chicken way out and say it's either Jordan or Wilt for me.
Anyways, it'd be Wilt or Jordan for me. In today's rules seeing how a guy like Kobe can control the pace of the game throughout and singlehandedly win you games in 4th quarters, it'd be scary to think what prime MJ would be able to do in the no handchecks era. Then a guy like Wilt that can anchor your defense, and is arguably the most dominant offensive player to have ever played is real tough to choose from.
Then you look at the difference from their peers at the same position and the depth at that position
Wilt
Russell
Kareem
Hakeem
Shaq
Robinson
Moses
Duncan
(guys like Ewing as well)
or
Jordan
West
Kobe
(other swings like Havlicek, Erving, Drexler are there as well)
Seems like the big man depth is more than the actual DOMINANT wing depth. Give Jordan a second option and a bunch of good defenders, and I'd think they'd fare better than a team led by Wilt, especially considering there's more actual footage of Jordan and in the modern day era which is more geared towards perimeter play.
Then again I'm a sucker for a big man, so I'll take the chicken way out and say it's either Jordan or Wilt for me.

-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,400
- And1: 159
- Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Dream is as good as Kareem and is WAY better than Shaq and Duncan. I'm not being a homer; I'm being honest.
Do you remember what he did to Robinson in '95?
Or were you still in diapers?
Putting other centers up and not Dream spoils the legitimacy of the thread. You might as well add Steve Novak at this point, because this thread is a sham.
(For the record I'm picking Jordan)
Do you remember what he did to Robinson in '95?
Or were you still in diapers?
Putting other centers up and not Dream spoils the legitimacy of the thread. You might as well add Steve Novak at this point, because this thread is a sham.
(For the record I'm picking Jordan)
- moofs
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,077
- And1: 537
- Joined: Apr 17, 2006
- Location: "if the warriors win the title this season ill tattoo their logo in my di ck" -- 000001
- Contact: