RealGM

Excuse me if this has already been discussed at some point. I read on ESPN insider that a Boozer for Artest and Scola deal was discussed at the deadline. I'm not sure which team initiated that discussion. What do forum contributors think of that?

Boozer has become a jump shooter pretty much and is a defensive liability if hes not rebounding well

I was against the trade simply because Boozer has an expiring contract. Why trade your better assets for someone you can't afford to keep in the future?

I rather our split of Scola and Artest besides Boozer.

If it was really serious any chance died when McGrady pulled the plug on his season.
If the Rockets had a legit 2 guard,I prob would have done the deal. Boozer would have addressed one of the crucial flaws on the Rockets-rebounding and he would space the floor better w/his shooting.
The deciding thing for me would be if I think I could find an adequate Scola replacement this summer should Boozer walk.

We're not a good fit for Boozer anyways. Our owner isn't blind.

Boozer probably wouldn't have the same impact without Deron anyway

RaoulDuke79 wrote:We're not a good fit for Boozer anyways. Our owner isn't blind.

Ouch, zing!