RealGM

http://www.blazersedge.com/2009/5/29/89 ... pper-limit

If anyone on here has a good amount of free time, a list like this for SG/SFs and C's would be wickedbadcool
Let me know if you get get this done, if not, I'll try and run something myself before too long ... i.e. hopefully before the end of the offseason.

I'd personally like to see a few other stats measured against that same formula, so rather than PER, say, use FIC40 or WP40, heck, maybe even rebounds.

I'm not against splitting this up with someone if need be, just DEFINITELY don't have time to do it myself right now.

Are you trying to compile PER/$, "Rating" or both?
PER/$ should be pretty straightforward, but you might have to devise a new approach to determine "rating" for SG/SF.

That chart is basically trying to combine a "one-stop effectiveness rating" stat, put it in perspective of their bargain value - Production / Cost, then list it with their perceived strengths and weaknesses, focusing on the area in which the team in question is perceived to need the most help or some skill for a player to be a good fit.

So yeah it could look like (full chart)
PER | FIC48 | WP48 | AvgSalary | ContractYearsLeft | Age@StartOfNextSeason | PER / Salary | FIC48 / Salary | WP48 / Salary - Expected strengths and weaknesses

There's a link that directs to another page, and it delineates how the "rating" was determined for each PG. http://www.blazersedge.com/2009/5/29/89 ... pper-limit

After reading that page, I assumed the criteria of evaluation should be somewhat different for SG/SF. But I guess it doesn't really matter anymore since your elaborated chart won't focus on "rating".

OH! I had no idea what you meant by "Rating". Must be, oh, maybe, the one right in front of my face on the link I provided. Never even looked at it because it wasn't defined.