Stackhouse to the Rockets?

Eralp · Post #1 » by **Eralp** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:24 am

"Marc Stein of ESPN.com writes that Stackhouse is still on the market because he is waiting for a firm offer from the Rockets.

Stackhouse was called by Houston earlier this month when they decided not to sign Rashad McCants, according to sources."

thoughts??

JSB · Post #2 » by **JSB** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:52 am

sign him

YaoZaii · Post #3 » by **YaoZaii** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 12:43 pm

Well, not sure about it.

Yes - We need a taller SG.

No - He wasn't playing well last season. A decline?

PocketRockets · Post #4 » by **PocketRockets** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:41 pm

I'd rather give the PT to our young guys to "develop" them. This is realistically a rebuild season. So let the young cats get better so we can "make a run" in the next season or so.

YaoZaii · Post #5 » by **YaoZaii** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:36 pm

true.

currently i see budinger starting for us before the year end.

jove9 · Post #6 » by **jove9** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:46 pm

I'm not so sure if I want the Mavs' trash....

On the subject of Birdinger, here are a few personal matchups I can't wait to see:

Birdinger vs. Adam Morrison
Birdinger vs. Steve Novak
Birdinger vs. Wally World
Birdinger vs. Reddick
Birdinger vs. Larry Bird

Hell, Chase vs. Larry can be the undercard of the Russell vs. Jordan matchup. Not only that, but Chase vs. Larry has the potential to be an emmy award winning tv show.

Get 'er done, Morey!

KiDdFrESh · Post #7 » by **KiDdFrESh** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:50 pm

Pfftt...

Don't want Stackhouse and don't need him. Dude is finished.

Rendezvous · Post #8 » by **Rendezvous** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:51 pm

Stackhouse was HORRIBLE for the Mavericks

were to smart to get garbage

Romel Beck is better than him rite now

tha_rock220 · Post #9 » by **tha_rock220** » Tue Oct 20, 2009 12:14 am

We don't need Stackhouse. We're not going to win anything this year. Why do we need him taking up playing time???

rocketsballin · Post #10 » by **rocketsballin** » Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:04 am

man we dont need him, we got enough players , if tmac dont pan out we can trade for a decent guard . the team is sposed to be playing mroe small ball. lowry/brooks/taylor at guards, shane can play sg for the entire game, we dont need a sg we need a SHOT BLOCKER!!!

RaoulDuke79 · Post #11 » by **RaoulDuke79** » Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:34 am

I would probably stop watching the Rockets if they acquire anybody from "that team".

hipmaster · Post #12 » by **hipmaster** » Tue Oct 20, 2009 4:22 am

Don't want him. Don't need him. Too old. Too expensive. Need to develop young players, not make a retirement home for old ex-mavs.

2fast4u · Post #13 » by **2fast4u** » Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:33 am

vet min. yeah