Jordan Hill and Hilton Armstrong, how they compare

Aaron Brooks · Post #1 » by **Aaron Brooks** » Tue Feb 16, 2010 5:34 am

Put this together real quick using Draftexpress.com

Guy986 · Post #2 » by **Guy986** » Tue Feb 16, 2010 5:39 am

Tyrus Thomas is a monster just looking at it from a physical perspective.

7'3 Wingspan? 5.6 body fat. 34 no step vertical and 39.5 max vertical. My god....

BTW, whose the 2nd guy from the top?

Aaron Brooks · Post #3 » by **Aaron Brooks** » Tue Feb 16, 2010 5:54 am

Richard Elmer Dorsey

Guy986 · Post #4 » by **Guy986** » Tue Feb 16, 2010 6:04 am

Aaron Brooks wrote:Richard Elmer Dorsey

No wonder i don't recognize him. We never get to see the guy play.

DreamShook34 · Post #5 » by **DreamShook34** » Tue Feb 16, 2010 8:01 pm

Dwight Howard Body Fat: N/A.

Epic. LOL

PocketRockets · Post #6 » by **PocketRockets** » Tue Feb 16, 2010 9:49 pm

DreamShook34 wrote:Dwight Howard Body Fat: N/A.

Epic. LOL

hahahah I remember him on draft day.....my what a couple of years does for your body.

G-Heel · Post #7 » by **G-Heel** » Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:16 am

Looks like he resemble Dwight the most. Anyone frequently watch him play? Can he ball?

Virus4762 · Post #8 » by **Virus4762** » Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:17 am

Howard's only 6'9 w/o shoes?

G-Heel · Post #9 » by **G-Heel** » Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:18 am

Virus4762 wrote:Howard's only 6'9 w/o shoes?

I think Dwight grew a bit since the draft, he should be closer to 6'10 w/o shoes now.

MaxRider · Post #10 » by **MaxRider** » Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:57 am

imo jordan hill is another stromile swift

Moreyball · Post #11 » by **Moreyball** » Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:47 am

way to early to make that comparison.

hill's production value to his contract isn't too bad.

45% shooter a small plus in the +/- stat that morey loves.

2.6 mil next year and then three team option years after that could come out 13 mil or so total.

he's got height. which we desperately need now. and he looks like he has room to add a lot of muscle over the next few years.

and he played college ball w/ budinger.

pass first · Post #12 » by **pass first** » Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:19 pm

He brings energy, is a nuisance on defense becuase of his mobility and length but he's obviously a rookie so not exactly lock down. He can knock down a jumpshot. No idea if he got post moves.

moofs · Post #13 » by **moofs** » Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:37 pm

Moreyball, how do you figure Daryl loves +/-?

hobojoe2131 · Post #14 » by **hobojoe2131** » Thu Feb 18, 2010 2:45 am

pass first wrote:He brings energy, is a nuisance on defense becuase of his mobility and length but he's obviously a rookie so not exactly lock down. He can knock down a jumpshot. No idea if he got post moves.

He has post moves but doesnt attack the rim because he lacks strength and they almost always end up with a fadeaway jumper. He also has really bad hands.

moofs · Post #15 » by **moofs** » Thu Feb 18, 2010 4:25 pm

</thread>

MSGBallerz · Post #16 » by **MSGBallerz** » Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:35 pm

Don't get your Hopes up with Hill. I've been hopeful for him since we drafted him and I gave him chance after chance. He always lets you down.

Post #17 » by **Young_Star11** » Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:40 pm

Solid back-up PF at the moment is all we'd like, at least right now...and Hill should be capable of that.

Munchlaxatives · Post #18 » by **Munchlaxatives** » Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:10 pm

MSGBallerz wrote:Don't get your Hopes up with Hill. I've been hopeful for him since we drafted him and I gave him chance after chance. He always lets you down.

You could say the same about Kyle Lowry with Memphis. Or Von Wafer with the Blazers/Nuggets/Lakers. Morey sees things us humans don't.

Jaykoolzboy · Post #19 » by **Jaykoolzboy** » Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:15 pm

Munchlaxatives wrote:
MSGBallerz wrote:Don't get your Hopes up with Hill. I've been hopeful for him since we drafted him and I gave him chance after chance. He always lets you down.

You could say the same about Kyle Lowry with Memphis. Or Von Wafer with the Blazers/Nuggets/Lakers. Morey sees things us humans don't.

I think he spent at least 10 hours to calculate Hill's future with all the stats on his hand. :lol:

Post #20 » by **Manhattan Project** » Fri Feb 19, 2010 2:36 am

There are a few things that pop out when you watch Hill play, some good and some bad.

- He is active. Always around the ball, boxes out properly, setting screens.
- He has bad hands. I don't know what it is, but he seems to fumble the ball a lot. On passes and rebounds.
- He does have a nice stroke. He never really got steady shots nor was he ever in the flow on offense.
- He is a solid low post defender from the limited sample that we seen thus far.

Overall he has a lot of question marks, but I seen no flashes from him this year. If all you need him to do is come off the bench for now, he should be fine this year.