Page 1 of 1

Dorsey Waived

Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 11:26 am
by N.O.R.E.
Never posted on this board before 8-) , but the wiretap says the Kings just waived Dorsey. Do you think the Rockets would be interested in bringing him back in the offseason, or do you think the Rox have moved on?

Re: Dorsey Waived

Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 12:20 pm
by x-
Probably not, but you never know for sure with Morey.

Most Rockets fans like Dorsey. He's shown some flashes, kinda seems to have all the potential to become a Ben Wallace type of player, but then there are some work ethic questions and there seems to be some Adelman/FO dislike for Dorsey who also seems like a headcase/not very coachable:

Kings cut Joey Dorsey largely for clownish behavior, source says. They don't consider him bad guy, but coaches feared his act rubbing off.


http://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/

Re: Dorsey Waived

Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 1:28 pm
by KiDdFrESh
Its a shame the guy seems to have an IQ lower than Mr Potatoe Head. I thought he could be a legit role player at least.

Re: Dorsey Waived

Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 3:54 pm
by moofs
I'd like him back if he either developed an IQ or spontaneously evolved past the last epoch.

Complete sentences are a definite plus.

Re: Dorsey Waived

Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 6:08 pm
by YaoZaii
If we pick up Dorsey and he becomes a decent player... it must be considered then that Morey has literally robbed the Kings and Knicks trade with us.

Re: Dorsey Waived

Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:04 pm
by M4P
Ehh he'll grow up sooner or later. Isn't he making the minimum anyway? I'd give him another chance.

Re: Dorsey Waived

Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:27 pm
by DreamShook34
Undersized players that have no offensive game have to put in extra work to become decent.. Dorsey just doesn't have the drive.

Re: Dorsey Waived

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 5:14 pm
by KiDdFrESh
He showed flashes though and is signed to really cheap deal. We should bring him back.

Re: Dorsey Waived

Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 7:47 pm
by AntiSuperstar
I might be more pessimistic about Dorsey if it wasn't for the fact that he looked good when he finally got time this year. It seems to me, whatever it is, he's a guy whose practice habits, personality, something rubs coaches the wrong way and it holds him back, but when he finally gets the chance he plays well. He dominated Summer League, he dominated the D-League, he finally gets a handful of games to play in the NBA and he does a good job. And the Rockets could use him, but they seem to be committed to developing Jordan Hill, who so far is every bit the "bad rookie" D'Antoni calls him.

Re: Dorsey Waived

Posted: Sat Apr 3, 2010 6:22 pm
by Aaron Brooks
http://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA

The Rockets made an offer to re-sign Dorsey again, but he chose the Raptors.

Re: Dorsey Waived

Posted: Mon Apr 5, 2010 6:16 am
by M4P
Aaron Brooks wrote:http://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA

The Rockets made an offer to re-sign Dorsey again, but he chose the Raptors.

Hah! Hope he has fun rebuilding with Toronto.

Re: Dorsey Waived

Posted: Tue Apr 6, 2010 5:59 am
by HTown_TMac
He will get PT

Re: Dorsey Waived

Posted: Tue Apr 6, 2010 4:40 pm
by _Max
Always hoped Dorsey could have become a Ben Wallace type player with us, but it seems that he hasn't improved as much as the Adelman and Morey would like in, what, 2 years?

As for Toronto over us, I'm pretty sure that the main reason is PT.

Re: Dorsey Waived

Posted: Tue Apr 6, 2010 5:37 pm
by moofs
AntiSuperstar wrote:I might be more pessimistic about Dorsey if it wasn't for the fact that he looked good when he finally got time this year. It seems to me, whatever it is, he's a guy whose practice habits, personality, something rubs coaches the wrong way and it holds him back, but when he finally gets the chance he plays well. He dominated Summer League, he dominated the D-League, he finally gets a handful of games to play in the NBA and he does a good job. And the Rockets could use him, but they seem to be committed to developing Jordan Hill, who so far is every bit the "bad rookie" D'Antoni calls him.


Agreed with everything but the "bad rookie" bit. How would that be?

He's shooting well, rebounding pretty well, drawing good fouls, not turning the ball over too much (could use some improvement, but lots of guys have that problem early on). Seems like his main things to improve are his foul rate and a bit on defense.