Barnett Complains About Fans/LB Rotation via Twitter

Thunder Muscle · Post #1 » by **Thunder Muscle** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:26 am

Per JSOnline...

# Well, we have our first Twitter second guess. Nick Barnett said on his Twitter account after the game that the LB rotation is not something he likes. "Hard to get in The swing of things in a rotation.. Don't know why we are even in a rotation at this point."

# Barnett also didn't take kindly to the boos he got for the celebration: "Oh yea for everyone that had something to say after I celebrated for making a takle for lost KISS MY ASS... I was trying to get the defense fired up...and so what if I missed the takle before am I suppose to stay in a funk about it!?? Get a life."

After 2007 I was a big Barnett backer, but his play slipped last year, then got hurt, and now is nothing but a mouth piece. I'd rather take my chances with Bishop who seems hungrier and has a nose for the ball. Barnett is nowhere to be seen.

trwi7 · Post #2 » by **trwi7** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:30 am

I'm going to make a twitter account and complain about Barnett's and the Packers' play in general.

Flames24Rulz · Post #3 » by **Flames24Rulz** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:36 am

trwi7 wrote:I'm going to make a twitter account and complain about Barnett's and the Packers' play in general.

I think I should make another one just to send him comments about how crappy the defense was altogether.

Might as well take advantage of it.

Thunder Muscle · Post #4 » by **Thunder Muscle** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:41 am

trwi7 wrote:I'm going to make a twitter account and complain about Barnett's and the Packers' play in general.

Amen brotha.

Post #5 » by **MickeyDavis** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:51 am

Yeah we talked about this a little bit in the game thread. I agree that the rotations suck. Barnett should be on the bench. With Hawk next to him.

Flames24Rulz · Post #6 » by **Flames24Rulz** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:53 am

MickeyDavis wrote:Yeah we talked about this a little bit in the game thread. I agree that the rotations suck. Barnett should be on the bench. With Hawk next to him.

The only LB's that have actually shown me something have been Chillar and Matthews. All the rest? Screw em.

trwi7 · Post #7 » by **trwi7** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 1:09 am

Flames24Rulz wrote:
MickeyDavis wrote:Yeah we talked about this a little bit in the game thread. I agree that the rotations suck. Barnett should be on the bench. With Hawk next to him.

The only LB's that have actually shown me something have been Chillar and Matthews. All the rest? Screw em.

How dare you not mention Desmond Bishop. How dare you!

Flames24Rulz · Post #8 » by **Flames24Rulz** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 1:13 am

trwi7 wrote:
Flames24Rulz wrote:
MickeyDavis wrote:Yeah we talked about this a little bit in the game thread. I agree that the rotations suck. Barnett should be on the bench. With Hawk next to him.

The only LB's that have actually shown me something have been Chillar and Matthews. All the rest? Screw em.

How dare you not mention Desmond Bishop. How dare you!

Ah yeah, the ST 'ace' who contributed to one of our many flags on special teams today.

trwi7 · Post #9 » by **trwi7** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 1:17 am

Flames24Rulz wrote:Ah yeah, the ST 'ace' who contributed to one of our many flags on special teams today.

How dare you!!!

Thunder Muscle · Post #10 » by **Thunder Muscle** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 1:32 am

Johnny Holland has to have a year left in the tank. Bring'em back for Club 56.

SteveScheffler · Post #11 » by **SteveScheffler** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 2:01 am

if barnett sits hes gonna throw a tantrum. we should just release this guy right now and save a major headache later this year when he becomes such a huge liability that we are forced to sit him.

Thunder Muscle · Post #12 » by **Thunder Muscle** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 2:48 am

SteveScheffler wrote:if barnett sits hes gonna throw a tantrum. we should just release this guy right now and save a major headache later this year when he becomes such a huge liability that we are forced to sit him.

No doubt he will throw a fit and probably demand a trade, become a cancer.

ClassicJack · Post #13 » by **ClassicJack** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 2:55 am

SteveScheffler wrote:if barnett sits hes gonna throw a tantrum. we should just release this guy right now and save a major headache later this year when he becomes such a huge liability that we are forced to sit him.

Don't you think that might be a little extreme at this point considering it was just a couple angry posts on Twitter immediately following a loss? I'm in no way condoning it but I just don't think this team is in a position to give away assets for nothing right now. They did it with Smith, Moll and Martin and we're feeling it in a major way in 2 of those 3 players positions right now

Fandom · Post #14 » by **Fandom** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 2:58 am

Cut him loose. The guy is and always has been a clown. He thinks way too highly of himself and his ability to play LB in the NFL. Great Nick, you made a tackle for a loss.

crkone · Post #15 » by **crkone** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 1:20 pm

So would you rather have Barnett being pissed off after a loss, or blowing it off and worrying about what he was going to do that night?

Flames24Rulz · Post #16 » by **Flames24Rulz** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 3:43 pm

NickBarnett: Hey everyone.. I done somethinking and I have decided to stay off Twitter unroll next offseason.. I am a emotional person and sometimes

NickBarnett: With this Twitter thing I forget that everything is public.. Sometimes I feel I am talking to my freinds and just talk.. So I am going

NickBarnett: To pull myself away from that.. Thanks to all the people who supported me thru my rehab and tough times and for the haters well god loves u

That kind of sucks because I did like reading what he had to say, but it's probably for the best. He can deny all he wants that the organization didn't tell him to shut it down, but I think that's the case. Oh and Jermichael Finley is going through a very tough time in life right now:

JermichaelF88: Is it ok if ur wife, mother of ur child poses nude? I'm not too sure how I feel about that one

an_also · Post #17 » by **an_also** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:53 pm

Flames24Rulz wrote:JermichaelF88: Is it ok if ur wife, mother of ur child poses nude? I'm not too sure how I feel about that one

lol wtf..

SteveScheffler · Post #18 » by **SteveScheffler** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 6:05 pm

an_also wrote:
Flames24Rulz wrote:JermichaelF88: Is it ok if ur wife, mother of ur child poses nude? I'm not too sure how I feel about that one

lol wtf..

oh man this guy is giving linebackers some serious trash talking material...

Thunder Muscle · Post #19 » by **Thunder Muscle** » Tue Sep 22, 2009 2:33 am

an_also wrote:
Flames24Rulz wrote:JermichaelF88: Is it ok if ur wife, mother of ur child poses nude? I'm not too sure how I feel about that one

lol wtf..

Is this legit? lol

Flames24Rulz · Post #20 » by **Flames24Rulz** » Tue Sep 22, 2009 3:25 am

N8Frog wrote:
an_also wrote:
Flames24Rulz wrote:JermichaelF88: Is it ok if ur wife, mother of ur child poses nude? I'm not too sure how I feel about that one

lol wtf..

Is this legit? lol

Yes it is. I don't have the creativity to make something up like that.