ImageImage

OT: Wisconsin/Iowa in Separate Divisions in B10?

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,920
And1: 16,594
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

OT: Wisconsin/Iowa in Separate Divisions in B10? 

Post#1 » by humanrefutation » Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:58 am

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5498692

The Big Ten doesn't expect to reveal its new division alignment until mid September, but pieces of the puzzle are starting to be revealed.

Rivals Wisconsin and Iowa will be placed in different divisions when the plan is announced, Wisconsin athletic director Barry Alvarez told the Wisconsin State Journal on Wednesday. Alvarez also said the Big Ten will adopt a nine-game conference schedule beginning in 2015.

The former Wisconsin football coach provided no other details about the division alignment. Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany told ESPN.com on Tuesday that the league is about 80 percent done with the divisions and scheduling for the 2011 season, when Nebraska enters the conference.

"We've got the divisions, but we really don't have the schedules," Delany said. "The key critical area is we already had schedules [set] for '11."

Wisconsin and Iowa first met in 1894 and have played 85 times. The Badgers and Hawkeyes are currently protected rivals and have played every season since 1995.

Even if placed in separate divisions, the two teams could meet every season through a protected crossover game.

Delany told ESPN.com that a potential benefit of putting rivals like Michigan and Ohio State in different divisions is that the teams can play for a Rose Bowl berth in the new Big Ten championship game, which begins in 2011.

"If you split teams, whether it's Purdue and Indiana or Illinois and Northwestern or Michigan-Ohio State or Nebraska and Penn State, if you split them, they can both go [to the championship game]," Delany said. "If you don't split them, only one can go."


Kinda supports the B10 North/South split, huh?

North: Wisconsin, Michigan, Michigan State, Minnesota

South: Iowa, Ohio State, Nebraska, Penn State

Leaving Northwestern, Illinois, Indiana, and Purdue to be divided up between the N/S split.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,807
And1: 27,383
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: OT: Wisconsin/Iowa in Separate Divisions in B10? 

Post#2 » by trwi7 » Thu Aug 26, 2010 10:43 am

I really can't see them doing what you suggest. That's four top football programs all fighting it out in the South. Even if you put the best of the rest in the North that's an easy division for the Badgers, especially if Michigan doesn't get their act together.

More likely.

Iowa, Nebraska, Michigan, Michigan State, Northwestern, Purdue

Ohio State, Wisconsin, Penn State, Indiana, Illinois, Minnesota
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
Badgerlander
RealGM
Posts: 27,063
And1: 7,488
Joined: Jun 29, 2007
     

Re: OT: Wisconsin/Iowa in Separate Divisions in B10? 

Post#3 » by Badgerlander » Thu Aug 26, 2010 11:06 am

My guess is that they split the instate schools up, so it would be something like:

Michigan
Wisconsin
Penn State
Minnesota
Illinois
Purdue

Ohio State
Iowa
Nebraska
Michigan State
Northwestern
Indiana
Shoot, Move, and Communicate...

Spoiler:

I'm just here for my own amusement,"don't take offense at my innuendo..."


Countless waze, we pass the daze...

A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
User avatar
PkrsBcksGphsMqt
RealGM
Posts: 18,827
And1: 1,417
Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Location: Madison
   

Re: OT: Wisconsin/Iowa in Separate Divisions in B10? 

Post#4 » by PkrsBcksGphsMqt » Thu Aug 26, 2010 1:45 pm

I'm going to be curious to see what the "protected rivalries" are. Wisconsin and Minnesota are both going to be fighting to have Iowa as their protected rivalry.
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,763
And1: 6,963
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: OT: Wisconsin/Iowa in Separate Divisions in B10? 

Post#5 » by LUKE23 » Thu Aug 26, 2010 1:49 pm

I actually like trying to split up the divisions to try and keep the talent pretty equal, even if the rivals are in separate divisions. Just use the crossover game protection so that the big time rivalry games stay intact.

More likely.

Iowa, Nebraska, Michigan, Michigan State, Northwestern, Purdue

Ohio State, Wisconsin, Penn State, Indiana, Illinois, Minnesota


This is probably what I'd have as well. That is about as even as you can make it. Three perennial top 25 teams in each division. Personally, if I had to pick, I'd make Nebraska our crossover game. That just intrigues me a lot more than the Iowa matchup. I'd go:

Nebraska-Wisconsin
Iowa-Minnesota
Michigan-Ohio State
Northwestern-Illinois
Purdue-Indiana
Michigan State-Penn State

Penn State gets screwed sort of in that, but they don't have a true rival anyway.
User avatar
PkrsBcksGphsMqt
RealGM
Posts: 18,827
And1: 1,417
Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Location: Madison
   

Re: OT: Wisconsin/Iowa in Separate Divisions in B10? 

Post#6 » by PkrsBcksGphsMqt » Thu Aug 26, 2010 1:54 pm

LUKE23 wrote:Nebraska-Wisconsin
Iowa-Minnesota
Michigan-Ohio State
Northwestern-Illinois
Purdue-Indiana
Michigan State-Penn State

Penn State gets screwed sort of in that, but they don't have a true rival anyway.

That's how I'd do it as well.
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.

Return to Green Bay Packers