If You Want A Good Laugh (NFL Stadiums Related)...

MikeIsGood · Post #1 » by **MikeIsGood** » Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:38 am

http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Ran ... diums.html

Just keep scrolling

Turk Nowitzki · Post #2 » by **Turk Nowitzki** » Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:58 am

LOL at the Metrodump.

Wilford Brimley · Post #3 » by **Wilford Brimley** » Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:38 am

I read the title of the article and spat out my water.

Then I scrolled down and looked at their explanation for the Metrodump. :rofl:

Mags FTW · Post #4 » by **Mags FTW** » Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:45 am

12. Soldier Field (Chicago Bears)

Seating Capacity: 61,500
Playing Surface: A crappy combination of grass and mud.
Opened: 1924

Post #5 » by **ReasonablySober** » Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:23 pm

That whole article is outstanding.

30. The Oakland Coliseum (Oakland Raiders)

Seating Capacity: 63,026
Playing Surface: Grass
Opened: 1966

Please excuse my language, but this place is a first-class shithole. At first glimpse, it looks like someone molded a toxic landfill into an NFL stadium.

The only upside here is that the Raiders have some seriously dedicated fans.

I would know. One of them threatened to knife me back in 2005 when I made the mistake of going to this place with a bunch of Giants fans for the regular season finale on December 31. I wasn’t even rooting for the Giants, but apparently I was guilty by association.

-25 points: I had been drinking heavily that day, but I’m pretty sure I was sitting on metal bleachers instead of an actual seat. I’d be willing to bet that there are high school stadiums in West Texas that are more advanced than this dump.

Wiscfan92 · Post #6 » by **Wiscfan92** » Mon Feb 21, 2011 3:38 pm

Great read, very funny that we're the top of the scale and minnesota is dead last

trwi7 · Post #7 » by **trwi7** » Mon Feb 21, 2011 5:50 pm

Wilford Brimley wrote:I read the title of the article and spat out my water.

Why?

Kerb Hohl · Post #8 » by **Kerb Hohl** » Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:22 pm

So apparently sitting on metal bleachers is a detriment to Oakland but Lambeau is #1?

Wilford Brimley · Post #9 » by **Wilford Brimley** » Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:27 pm

trwi7 wrote:
Wilford Brimley wrote:I read the title of the article and spat out my water.

Why?

Because I knew who would be last, and the title of the thread said, "if you want a good laugh."

chuckleslove · Post #10 » by **chuckleslove** » Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:39 pm

GrendonJennings wrote:So apparently sitting on metal bleachers is a detriment to Oakland but Lambeau is #1?

Yeah I found that funny but Lambeau isn't listed on his list of stadiums he has been to whereas he has been to the Coliseum.