ImageImage

Big Article on Rodgers

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 107,871
And1: 42,165
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Big Article on Rodgers 

Post#1 » by ReasonablySober » Fri Sep 7, 2012 8:25 pm

User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,883
And1: 41,262
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Big Article on Rodgers 

Post#2 » by emunney » Fri Sep 7, 2012 8:46 pm

Lol Purdue.

Rodgers had been an unrecruited 165-pound high school quarterback from Chico, Calif., who once received a letter from the Purdue coaching staff that read, "Good luck with your attempt at a college football career."


Pretty amazing. Who's passive aggressive in a rejection letter?
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Balls2TheWalls
RealGM
Posts: 20,343
And1: 4,113
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
         

Re: Big Article on Rodgers 

Post#3 » by Balls2TheWalls » Fri Sep 7, 2012 8:58 pm

As a Purdue grad, I cringed when I read that.
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,920
And1: 16,594
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: Big Article on Rodgers 

Post#4 » by humanrefutation » Fri Sep 7, 2012 9:02 pm

I had a friend who got rejected from a job a few weeks ago who got a letter that implied that he was wasting his and their time by applying. It said something like "we received applications from a number of qualified candidates. You were not one of them." Like, just straight up mean and deflating.

We had a good laugh about it, because an employer who is enough of an ass to send something like that is probably someone who isn't worth working for.
User avatar
PkrsBcksGphsMqt
RealGM
Posts: 18,827
And1: 1,417
Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Location: Madison
   

Re: Big Article on Rodgers 

Post#5 » by PkrsBcksGphsMqt » Fri Sep 7, 2012 9:26 pm

humanrefutation wrote:I had a friend who got rejected from a job a few weeks ago who got a letter that implied that he was wasting his and their time by applying. It said something like "we received applications from a number of qualified candidates. You were not one of them." Like, just straight up mean and deflating.

We had a good laugh about it, because an employer who is enough of an ass to send something like that is probably someone who isn't worth working for.


That's ridiculous. What a piece of **** organization.
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,883
And1: 41,262
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Big Article on Rodgers 

Post#6 » by emunney » Fri Sep 7, 2012 9:50 pm

humanrefutation wrote:I had a friend who got rejected from a job a few weeks ago who got a letter that implied that he was wasting his and their time by applying. It said something like "we received applications from a number of qualified candidates. You were not one of them." Like, just straight up mean and deflating.

We had a good laugh about it, because an employer who is enough of an ass to send something like that is probably someone who isn't worth working for.


Absolutely. It's a sign of incompetence and immaturity for any official communication to go out the door looking like that. Young company?
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,920
And1: 16,594
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: Big Article on Rodgers 

Post#7 » by humanrefutation » Fri Sep 7, 2012 9:55 pm

PkrsBcksGphsMqt wrote:
humanrefutation wrote:I had a friend who got rejected from a job a few weeks ago who got a letter that implied that he was wasting his and their time by applying. It said something like "we received applications from a number of qualified candidates. You were not one of them." Like, just straight up mean and deflating.

We had a good laugh about it, because an employer who is enough of an ass to send something like that is probably someone who isn't worth working for.


That's ridiculous. What a piece of **** organization.


As **** up as it was, I'd still argue that the tactics the Padres used here were even more despicable.

http://deadspin.com/5933467/i-would-lik ... etter-ever
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,805
And1: 27,381
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Big Article on Rodgers 

Post#8 » by trwi7 » Sat Sep 8, 2012 12:15 am

If only Reed hadn't been banned. He could defend this.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
PkrsBcksGphsMqt
RealGM
Posts: 18,827
And1: 1,417
Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Location: Madison
   

Re: Big Article on Rodgers 

Post#9 » by PkrsBcksGphsMqt » Sat Sep 8, 2012 1:39 am

trwi7 wrote:If only Reed hadn't been banned. He could defend this.


:rofl:

Amazingly, I had already forgot about him. I would have loved to hear him chime in on this.
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,920
And1: 16,594
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: Big Article on Rodgers 

Post#10 » by humanrefutation » Sat Sep 8, 2012 2:49 am

trwi7 wrote:If only Reed hadn't been banned. He could defend this.


I swear to God, I had the same exact post written like three hours ago and must've failed to post it before I left for the gym. :lol:
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,920
And1: 16,594
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: Big Article on Rodgers 

Post#11 » by humanrefutation » Sat Sep 8, 2012 2:54 am

emunney wrote:
humanrefutation wrote:I had a friend who got rejected from a job a few weeks ago who got a letter that implied that he was wasting his and their time by applying. It said something like "we received applications from a number of qualified candidates. You were not one of them." Like, just straight up mean and deflating.

We had a good laugh about it, because an employer who is enough of an ass to send something like that is probably someone who isn't worth working for.


Absolutely. It's a sign of incompetence and immaturity for any official communication to go out the door looking like that. Young company?


It was some law firm on the West Coast - I think I remember it being a smaller firm but I don't exactly recall. I just couldn't believe the audacity of the employer to send something so patently rude. It was mind-blowing, to the point that when he handed it to me and he saw the reaction on my face as I was reading it, he burst out laughing and I couldn't help but join him.
eagle13
Head Coach
Posts: 6,145
And1: 107
Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Location: san diego

Re: Big Article on Rodgers 

Post#12 » by eagle13 » Sat Sep 8, 2012 4:04 am

I like the Rodgers / Starr connection. Starr's brilliance was his character, leadership & game IQ = great influence on Rodgers who was/is fertile soil. Confidence & humility can be quite a challenge for a mega-star to balance. Starr & Rodgers have been successful. Add the precision, study, attention to details, & field awareness to considerable physical gifts - arm strength & mobility and Rodgers is pretty amazing. Man are we luuuuckeeee! God bless Thompson!!!

Return to Green Bay Packers