ImageImage

Official Training Camp Thread

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
Marley2Hendrix
RealGM
Posts: 11,689
And1: 2,586
Joined: Jun 16, 2003
     

Re: Official Training Camp Thread 

Post#1141 » by Marley2Hendrix » Mon Sep 2, 2013 7:21 pm

emunney wrote:He's more like a smaller version of Alex Smith than Vince Young.


Well said, Young doesn't have 1/10 the awareness of Wallace. Didn't Wallace destroy us two preseasons in a row for the Browns awhile back? Honestly, seems like the closest thing we could get to Matt Flynn besides the real matty ice himself. We'll be happy with Wallace.
You gotta make it sexy! Hips and nips, otherwise I'm not eating.
Bucksfans1and2
Banned User
Posts: 16,041
And1: 189
Joined: Jun 28, 2008

Re: Official Training Camp Thread 

Post#1142 » by Bucksfans1and2 » Mon Sep 2, 2013 10:11 pm

vegaspacker wrote:A really big HAH, I told you so... going to the folks that said we would only go with 7 olineman..... ridiculous!!


We did it last year?
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,763
And1: 6,963
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Official Training Camp Thread 

Post#1143 » by LUKE23 » Tue Sep 3, 2013 2:59 am

If anyone cares, Football Outsiders Projections for the NFC North, with NFL ranks for O/D.

Packers: 1st in division, 1st in O, 15th in D
Bears: 2nd in division, 30th in O, 1st in D
Vikings: 3rd in division, 24th in O, 25th in D
Lions: 4th in division, 12th in O, 27th in D

Pro Football Focus record predictions:

GB: 11-5
CHI: 9-7
MIN: 7-9
DET: 5-11
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,883
And1: 41,260
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Official Training Camp Thread 

Post#1144 » by emunney » Tue Sep 3, 2013 3:03 am

Where do they have us ranking in toughness?
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,152
And1: 15,031
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: Official Training Camp Thread 

Post#1145 » by Ayt » Tue Sep 3, 2013 5:14 am

emunney wrote:Where do they have us ranking in toughness?


Don't be ridiculous. The real key is where we rank as a team in terms of the average height and weight of all the players on our 53 man roster.
whatthe_buck!?
Banned User
Posts: 5,142
And1: 163
Joined: Jul 20, 2006

Re: Official Training Camp Thread 

Post#1146 » by whatthe_buck!? » Tue Sep 3, 2013 5:32 am

Ayt wrote:
emunney wrote:Where do they have us ranking in toughness?


Don't be ridiculous. The real key is where we rank as a team in terms of the average height and weight of all the players on our 53 man roster.


You guys are both completely off your rockers, you're reacting to predictions made by f*cking Football Outsiders and and Pro Football Focus. How would u allow yourselves to be so obviously trolled? This is what the response of actual tuned-in folks would be: FO;DR, PFF;DR, GTFOWTBS.

What we all should actually be waiting for is the Rilamann/xTitan/McGinn collaborative article on Bleacher Report that gives a 1-100 toughness ranking for every single Nfl player and then gives each team a cumulative toughness total score (CTTS) and then cross multiplies that number by [height (in inches) + weight (in ounces) + d*ck volume (in milliliters)] of every player on said teams and then organizes all that priceless data in rankings that show where each team stands 1-32. The only relevant rankings for anyone to discuss IMO...
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,785
And1: 27,354
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Official Training Camp Thread 

Post#1147 » by trwi7 » Tue Sep 3, 2013 5:43 am

We should sign Al Harris to increase the team's dick volume.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
whatthe_buck!?
Banned User
Posts: 5,142
And1: 163
Joined: Jul 20, 2006

Re: Official Training Camp Thread 

Post#1148 » by whatthe_buck!? » Tue Sep 3, 2013 6:02 am

trwi7 wrote:We should sign Al Harris to increase the team's dick volume.

I feel like u make this statement because u have a severe and fundamental misunderstanding of the function that generates the rankings I describe. Whatever exceptional Toughness and DV that Al would bring to the team would be more than canceled out by the subpar height and weight he would bring to the offensive tackle position. I also question ur claim that Harris brings such strong potential d*ck-size dynamism to the roster. Pics or gtfo...

Return to Green Bay Packers