GT: Pack @ Broncos
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
-
WiscoKing13
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,977
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
Anyone of the reporters going to ask why we don't bump and run in man coverage? These free releases are annoying as ****.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
-
BUCKnation
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,592
- And1: 4,249
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
Shields with a sling.
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
-
WiscoKing13
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,977
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
Shields in a sling
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
-
WiscoKing13
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,977
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
How do you spend 2 weeks off game planning and out with Hayward on the outside, and hyde in the slot? Seriously what is Dom watching on film? Feel like Hyde is the new Hawk, assignment sure but continuously beat.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
-
Mags FTW
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,389
- And1: 8,012
- Joined: Feb 16, 2006
- Location: Flickin' It
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
dietac wrote:MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:For Rodgers, I sometimes gets a vibe where he stops caring when things aren't going right and he can easily blame it on the line.
He turned around and had Ware bearing down on him... it wasn't Rodgers that gave up on that play.
I think he's referring to the fact that Richard Rodgers should've just fell on the ball.
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
-
ampd
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,607
- And1: 5,049
- Joined: Dec 06, 2010
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
Rodgers has been flat out bad tonight
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
-
Mags FTW
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,389
- And1: 8,012
- Joined: Feb 16, 2006
- Location: Flickin' It
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
Lol, what?
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
-
WiscoKing13
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,977
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
Surprised MM gave up there.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
-
emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 62,882
- And1: 41,258
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
Um, what the ****? I have never seen a call like that.
Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
-
BUCKnation
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,592
- And1: 4,249
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
Playing broncos D so I still have this on. That was terrible, Jones stopped playing.
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
-
dedned
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,728
- And1: 1,470
- Joined: Feb 02, 2005
- Location: nowhere
-
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
-
WiscoKing13
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,977
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
Why the **** is clay still in?
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
-
Mags FTW
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,389
- And1: 8,012
- Joined: Feb 16, 2006
- Location: Flickin' It
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
WiscoKing13 wrote:Why the **** is clay still in?
McCarthy has the Packer's D.
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
-
xTitan
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,135
- And1: 2,283
- Joined: Mar 03, 2006
-
Re: GT: Pack @ Broncos
Congrats Teddy, Nate Palmer is the new Brad Jones