Bears Leadup
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Re: Bears Leadup
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,791
- And1: 1,273
- Joined: Jan 26, 2008
-
Re: Bears Leadup
I'll guess Montgomery is back for Dallas, 10 days after Detroit.
Re: Bears Leadup
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,430
- And1: 847
- Joined: Dec 13, 2011
- Location: Itasca, IL
-
Re: Bears Leadup
I think we'll hold Forte in check, although he probably will break off a 20-yarder or so. It's Miller, the tight end, is who I'm worried about. But, hopefully a three phases builds off of last week, keeps it up. Go Pack Go.
Re: RE: Re: Bears Leadup
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,526
- And1: 10,868
- Joined: Jan 14, 2014
- Location: Hong Kong
-
Re: RE: Re: Bears Leadup
chuckleslove wrote:HKPackFan wrote:Not sure if this will work coz I'm on my phone but here's a tribute video I made for Favre. I have very little experience making videos but made an exception for Brett:
https://youtu.be/8atjgd9-oOk
Video is private, have to change it to public under your youtube account.
Did this work?
https://youtu.be/WbH3sMJTr5w
#FreeChuckDiesel
Re: Bears Leadup
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,546
- And1: 8,292
- Joined: Jun 29, 2005
-
Re: Bears Leadup
JackSIKMA43 wrote:I think we'll hold Forte in check, although he probably will break off a 20-yarder or so. It's Miller, the tight end, is who I'm worried about. But, hopefully a three phases builds off of last week, keeps it up. Go Pack Go.
I am actually more worried about Langford than Forte. His pass catching ability is top notch and I don't see any of our LBs covering him.
If they run a pass play with Langford and Forte in the backfield and Bennett over the middle our LB's will get smoked somehow.
Re: RE: Re: Bears Leadup
- chuckleslove
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,566
- And1: 1,128
- Joined: Nov 17, 2009
- Location: In an RV down by the river
- Contact:
-
Re: RE: Re: Bears Leadup
HKPackFan wrote:chuckleslove wrote:HKPackFan wrote:Not sure if this will work coz I'm on my phone but here's a tribute video I made for Favre. I have very little experience making videos but made an exception for Brett:
https://youtu.be/8atjgd9-oOk
Video is private, have to change it to public under your youtube account.
Did this work?
https://youtu.be/WbH3sMJTr5w
Yes
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page
Re: Bears Leadup
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,430
- And1: 847
- Joined: Dec 13, 2011
- Location: Itasca, IL
-
Re: Bears Leadup
Profound23 wrote:JackSIKMA43 wrote:I think we'll hold Forte in check, although he probably will break off a 20-yarder or so. It's Miller, the tight end, is who I'm worried about. But, hopefully a three phases builds off of last week, keeps it up. Go Pack Go.
I am actually more worried about Langford than Forte. His pass catching ability is top notch and I don't see any of our LBs covering him.
If they run a pass play with Langford and Forte in the backfield and Bennett over the middle our LB's will get smoked somehow.
Well, Bennett isn't even playing, he's ruled out. We always give up minimum two big plays to these turds, every time we play them - that should be expected. But, as I said, last week's game should be a primer of what we'll see, the rest of the way out. Having grown up in the 80's, I never "expect" to beat the Bears every time, but considering Rodgers and Lacy last week ... the Vikings' defense is worlds ahead of the Bears' defense. That said ... it shouldn't be too tough for us to score points tonight, although the stupid rain probably will be a factor.
Re: Bears Leadup
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,778
- And1: 7,290
- Joined: Jul 13, 2005
Re: Bears Leadup
JackSIKMA43 wrote:Profound23 wrote:JackSIKMA43 wrote:I think we'll hold Forte in check, although he probably will break off a 20-yarder or so. It's Miller, the tight end, is who I'm worried about. But, hopefully a three phases builds off of last week, keeps it up. Go Pack Go.
I am actually more worried about Langford than Forte. His pass catching ability is top notch and I don't see any of our LBs covering him.
If they run a pass play with Langford and Forte in the backfield and Bennett over the middle our LB's will get smoked somehow.
Well, Bennett isn't even playing, he's ruled out. We always give up minimum two big plays to these turds, every time we play them - that should be expected. But, as I said, last week's game should be a primer of what we'll see, the rest of the way out. Having grown up in the 80's, I never "expect" to beat the Bears every time, but considering Rodgers and Lacy last week ... the Vikings' defense is worlds ahead of the Bears' defense. That said ... it shouldn't be too tough for us to score points tonight, although the stupid rain probably will be a factor.
I don't know it feels very very hard for the Pack to get anything easy on offense right now.
Re: Bears Leadup
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,389
- And1: 8,012
- Joined: Feb 16, 2006
- Location: Flickin' It
Re: Bears Leadup
Well, the loss to the Lions looks less bad.
Re: Bears Leadup
- Siefer
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,107
- And1: 6,715
- Joined: Nov 05, 2006
-
Re: Bears Leadup
Gotta feel for Romo. Looked bad.