ImageImage

Packers vs. Bears

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
MissKhriddleton
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,315
And1: 3,619
Joined: Nov 03, 2015
 

Re: Packers vs. Bears 

Post#361 » by MissKhriddleton » Fri Nov 27, 2015 4:56 am

midranger wrote:
WiscoKing13 wrote:
chuckleslove wrote:MM needs to take over play calling again, our offense is just straight **** right now.

never ran the ball with lacey with 40 seconds left inside the 10.

This was insane.

Running the ball with 40 seconds left and no timeouts would be **** (Please Use More Appropriate Word).
jazzfanWA
Jazz Forum GTS Champion 2018-2019
Posts: 1,542
And1: 362
Joined: Oct 28, 2013

Re: Packers vs. Bears 

Post#362 » by jazzfanWA » Fri Nov 27, 2015 4:56 am

I am happy that Hallmark channel is showing their lame romantic Christmas movies because I will be watching those from now on instead of this pathetic team.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,881
And1: 41,257
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: RE: Re: Packers vs. Bears 

Post#363 » by emunney » Fri Nov 27, 2015 4:56 am

MissKhriddleton wrote:
midranger wrote:
WiscoKing13 wrote:never ran the ball with lacey with 40 seconds left inside the 10.

This was insane.

Running the ball with 40 seconds left and no timeouts would be **** (Please Use More Appropriate Word).

40 seconds, not 4 seconds.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
User avatar
Siefer
RealGM
Posts: 16,107
And1: 6,715
Joined: Nov 05, 2006
     

Re: Packers vs. Bears 

Post#364 » by Siefer » Fri Nov 27, 2015 4:57 am

Adams and Dickrod are incompetent, and it's miserable to watch them.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,510
And1: 11,298
Joined: May 12, 2002

Re: RE: Re: Packers vs. Bears 

Post#365 » by midranger » Fri Nov 27, 2015 4:59 am

emunney wrote:
MissKhriddleton wrote:
midranger wrote:This was insane.

Running the ball with 40 seconds left and no timeouts would be **** (Please Use More Appropriate Word).

40 seconds, not 4 seconds.

Seriously. You only have 4 plays. How long does this guy think it takes to run the ball? Could have run twice, thrown on third, and run pass option on 4th in 40 seconds.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
User avatar
dedned
Analyst
Posts: 3,728
And1: 1,470
Joined: Feb 02, 2005
Location: nowhere
       

Re: RE: Re: Packers vs. Bears 

Post#366 » by dedned » Fri Nov 27, 2015 5:02 am

emunney wrote:
MissKhriddleton wrote:
midranger wrote:This was insane.

Running the ball with 40 seconds left and no timeouts would be **** (Please Use More Appropriate Word).

40 seconds, not 4 seconds.

And the 4 plays we did run 2 were just wasted with Rodgers throwing the ball away. Would a been a miracle if we scored on the 3rd one and the last play was just asstastic
Image
WiscoKing13
RealGM
Posts: 11,977
And1: 1,441
Joined: Jan 03, 2009
     

Re: Packers vs. Bears 

Post#367 » by WiscoKing13 » Fri Nov 27, 2015 5:02 am

MissKhriddleton wrote:
midranger wrote:
WiscoKing13 wrote:never ran the ball with lacey with 40 seconds left inside the 10.

This was insane.

Running the ball with 40 seconds left and no timeouts would be **** (Please Use More Appropriate Word).

40, plenty of time to get the next snap off with 25 seconds, plenty of time.

EDIT: see the super bowl
DanoMac wrote:
bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.


I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,881
And1: 41,257
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Packers vs. Bears 

Post#368 » by emunney » Fri Nov 27, 2015 5:03 am

The thing that is really bugging is that I really believe a healthy Montgomery is playing starter snaps by now and is arguably our best receiver. Instead we have to watch Adams impotently hope the ball comes to him uncontested instead of just physically dominating DBs with the ball in the air like he should be.
Montgomery, Cobb, Janis, and Abby have all demonstrated an ability to actually beat a defensive back. Jones has made a lot of plays on a ball in the air (granted, none tonight). What has Adams done? He's an automatic cover. And Rodgers loves him.


Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,881
And1: 41,257
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: RE: Re: Packers vs. Bears 

Post#369 » by emunney » Fri Nov 27, 2015 5:06 am

WiscoKing13 wrote:
MissKhriddleton wrote:
midranger wrote:This was insane.

Running the ball with 40 seconds left and no timeouts would be **** (Please Use More Appropriate Word).

40, plenty of time to get the next snap off with 25 seconds, plenty of time.

EDIT: see the super bowl

Would think the fact that we turned it over with 24 seconds left would be evidence enough.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
User avatar
Iheartfootball
Head Coach
Posts: 6,709
And1: 5,779
Joined: May 09, 2014
     

Re: Packers vs. Bears 

Post#370 » by Iheartfootball » Fri Nov 27, 2015 5:07 am

The offense can run naked backwards through a field of dicks.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Everybody wants to go to heaven but nobody wants to die.
WiscoKing13
RealGM
Posts: 11,977
And1: 1,441
Joined: Jan 03, 2009
     

Re: Packers vs. Bears 

Post#371 » by WiscoKing13 » Fri Nov 27, 2015 5:10 am

MM putting some blame on not winning the premieter wins.
DanoMac wrote:
bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.


I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,881
And1: 41,257
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: RE: Re: Packers vs. Bears 

Post#372 » by emunney » Fri Nov 27, 2015 5:37 am

WiscoKing13 wrote:MM putting some blame on not winning the premieter wins.

Sorry, what?
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
WiscoKing13
RealGM
Posts: 11,977
And1: 1,441
Joined: Jan 03, 2009
     

Re: RE: Re: Packers vs. Bears 

Post#373 » by WiscoKing13 » Fri Nov 27, 2015 5:39 am

emunney wrote:
WiscoKing13 wrote:MM putting some blame on not winning the premieter wins.

Sorry, what?

WR's not winning one on one battles. Jones/Adams/Cobb, probably Rodgers but he's only used for check downs.
DanoMac wrote:
bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.


I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,510
And1: 11,298
Joined: May 12, 2002

Re: Packers vs. Bears 

Post#374 » by midranger » Fri Nov 27, 2015 5:48 am

emunney wrote:The thing that is really bugging is that I really believe a healthy Montgomery is playing starter snaps by now and is arguably our best receiver. Instead we have to watch Adams impotently hope the ball comes to him uncontested instead of just physically dominating DBs with the ball in the air like he should be.
Montgomery, Cobb, Janis, and Abby have all demonstrated an ability to actually beat a defensive back. Jones has made a lot of plays on a ball in the air (granted, none tonight). What has Adams done? He's an automatic cover. And Rodgers loves him.


Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

I said the same thing about Ty during the game. The offense died when he went down. Not only could he beat his guy, but he was very physical. I think he was about to explode before going down
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,388
And1: 8,012
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: Packers vs. Bears 

Post#375 » by Mags FTW » Fri Nov 27, 2015 5:59 am

WiscoKing13 wrote:MM putting some blame on not winning the premieter wins.

And here we all thought that it was obvious that our receivers can't win 1 on 1s and we should change the scheme. Guess the coaching staff disagrees.
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,388
And1: 8,012
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: Packers vs. Bears 

Post#376 » by Mags FTW » Fri Nov 27, 2015 6:03 am

JayMKE wrote:there wasn't anything we could do at the end, the WRs can't catch or get separation even in the open field let alone the redzone. Rodgers should of just tried to run it himself, probably the best chance of getting in the endzone there.

Maybe hand it to Lacy a couple of times.

Return to Green Bay Packers