Packers/Queens Leadup
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Re: Packers/Queens Leadup
- PkrsBcksGphsMqt
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,827
- And1: 1,417
- Joined: Oct 27, 2005
- Location: Madison
-
Re: Packers/Queens Leadup
Pretty psyched for this one. Can't wait to see what the Vikes stadium looks like on TV. It's pretty damn impressive in person. Would love to get the first W there.
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
Re: Packers/Queens Leadup
- BUCKnation
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,361
- And1: 4,166
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: Packers/Queens Leadup
1 point favorites seems like an easy bet to me. It would be very disappointing to lose to this team.
Re: Packers/Queens Leadup
- Ron Swanson
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,504
- And1: 29,315
- Joined: May 15, 2013
Re: Packers/Queens Leadup
I can't imagine that Bradford starting changes things much. If anything, I'd think that Hill is the safer choice and is less prone to make mistakes. The Titans defense pretty much shut them down and only lost because of two defensive TDs. I'll be pretty peeved if the defense doesn't hold them under 17 points, Shields or no Shields.
Re: Packers/Queens Leadup
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Packers/Queens Leadup
Ron Swanson wrote:I can't imagine that Bradford starting changes things much. If anything, I'd think that Hill is the safer choice and is less prone to make mistakes. The Titans defense pretty much shut them down and only lost because of two defensive TDs. I'll be pretty peeved if the defense doesn't hold them under 17 points, Shields or no Shields.
Quick start by the offense is important as well. Put more pressure on Bradford and take AP out of the game by forcing them to pass.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Packers/Queens Leadup
- PkrsBcksGphsMqt
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,827
- And1: 1,417
- Joined: Oct 27, 2005
- Location: Madison
-
Re: Packers/Queens Leadup
Still can't believe how much they gave up for Bradford.
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
Re: Packers/Queens Leadup
- thomchatt3rton
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,405
- And1: 2,236
- Joined: Jun 11, 2009
-
Re: Packers/Queens Leadup
PkrsBcksGphsMqt wrote:Still can't believe how much they gave up for Bradford.
Maybe they were already somewhat disenchanted w Bridgewater before he even got hurt, and the injury plus Bradfords availability just made the decision easier to make?
Idk Bradfords contract sitch tho so maybe thats nonsense. Certainly helps explain the overpay tho.
Re: Packers/Queens Leadup
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 13,024
- And1: 661
- Joined: Apr 25, 2003
Re: Packers/Queens Leadup
Silent counts will be important tonight, according to the js. That's because of "load" crowds.
Minor headline typo there, apparently.
Good chance to get a win tonight before Bradford gets more in synch. Or hurt. Or whatever.
Minor headline typo there, apparently.
Good chance to get a win tonight before Bradford gets more in synch. Or hurt. Or whatever.
Re: Packers/Queens Leadup
- thomchatt3rton
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,405
- And1: 2,236
- Joined: Jun 11, 2009
-
Re: Packers/Queens Leadup
Second road game in a row where the home-team will be treating the game like a mini Super Bowl- which I'm all for.
Trying to match these teams' intensity is a good thing. Intensity is high for divisional game on Sunday night anyway but the Vikes will be super-jacked.
Trying to match these teams' intensity is a good thing. Intensity is high for divisional game on Sunday night anyway but the Vikes will be super-jacked.
Re: Packers/Queens Leadup
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 62,786
- And1: 41,119
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: Packers/Queens Leadup
Seems weird that they cut Pressley without signing anybody.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: RE: Re: Packers/Queens Leadup
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,537
- And1: 20,240
- Joined: Feb 07, 2010
Re: RE: Re: Packers/Queens Leadup
emunney wrote:Seems weird that they cut Pressley without signing anybody.
Yeah super bizarre roster maneuvering. Assumed they would add a db. I guess it wont matter if he was gonna be inactive this week and if they simply pick him back up next week. Still strange though.
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
Re: Packers/Queens Leadup
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,740
- And1: 10,622
- Joined: Nov 01, 2012
Re: Packers/Queens Leadup
Fired up for this one.
Let's get our receivers involved with some shorter routes, and lets stop running that stupid pitch to Lacy from the shotgun. I don't think that play has gained yardage ever in the 3 years they've run it.
Let's get our receivers involved with some shorter routes, and lets stop running that stupid pitch to Lacy from the shotgun. I don't think that play has gained yardage ever in the 3 years they've run it.
Amos Barshad: "So you got a job, a place to live, a license? What’s left?"
Giannis: “Nothing. Just get a ring now.”
Giannis: “Nothing. Just get a ring now.”