ImageImage

Packers/Queens Leadup

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
PkrsBcksGphsMqt
RealGM
Posts: 18,827
And1: 1,417
Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Location: Madison
   

Re: Packers/Queens Leadup 

Post#61 » by PkrsBcksGphsMqt » Sun Sep 18, 2016 4:48 pm

Pretty psyched for this one. Can't wait to see what the Vikes stadium looks like on TV. It's pretty damn impressive in person. Would love to get the first W there.
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 19,361
And1: 4,166
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: Packers/Queens Leadup 

Post#62 » by BUCKnation » Sun Sep 18, 2016 4:53 pm

1 point favorites seems like an easy bet to me. It would be very disappointing to lose to this team.
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,504
And1: 29,315
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Packers/Queens Leadup 

Post#63 » by Ron Swanson » Sun Sep 18, 2016 4:54 pm

I can't imagine that Bradford starting changes things much. If anything, I'd think that Hill is the safer choice and is less prone to make mistakes. The Titans defense pretty much shut them down and only lost because of two defensive TDs. I'll be pretty peeved if the defense doesn't hold them under 17 points, Shields or no Shields.
WiscoKing13
RealGM
Posts: 11,976
And1: 1,441
Joined: Jan 03, 2009
     

Re: Packers/Queens Leadup 

Post#64 » by WiscoKing13 » Sun Sep 18, 2016 4:56 pm

Ron Swanson wrote:I can't imagine that Bradford starting changes things much. If anything, I'd think that Hill is the safer choice and is less prone to make mistakes. The Titans defense pretty much shut them down and only lost because of two defensive TDs. I'll be pretty peeved if the defense doesn't hold them under 17 points, Shields or no Shields.

Quick start by the offense is important as well. Put more pressure on Bradford and take AP out of the game by forcing them to pass.
DanoMac wrote:
bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.


I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
User avatar
PkrsBcksGphsMqt
RealGM
Posts: 18,827
And1: 1,417
Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Location: Madison
   

Re: Packers/Queens Leadup 

Post#65 » by PkrsBcksGphsMqt » Sun Sep 18, 2016 4:58 pm

Still can't believe how much they gave up for Bradford.
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
User avatar
thomchatt3rton
Head Coach
Posts: 6,405
And1: 2,236
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
 

Re: Packers/Queens Leadup 

Post#66 » by thomchatt3rton » Sun Sep 18, 2016 5:33 pm

PkrsBcksGphsMqt wrote:Still can't believe how much they gave up for Bradford.


Maybe they were already somewhat disenchanted w Bridgewater before he even got hurt, and the injury plus Bradfords availability just made the decision easier to make?
Idk Bradfords contract sitch tho so maybe thats nonsense. Certainly helps explain the overpay tho.
Jollay
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,024
And1: 661
Joined: Apr 25, 2003

Re: Packers/Queens Leadup 

Post#67 » by Jollay » Sun Sep 18, 2016 9:12 pm

Silent counts will be important tonight, according to the js. That's because of "load" crowds.

Minor headline typo there, apparently.

Good chance to get a win tonight before Bradford gets more in synch. Or hurt. Or whatever.
User avatar
thomchatt3rton
Head Coach
Posts: 6,405
And1: 2,236
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
 

Re: Packers/Queens Leadup 

Post#68 » by thomchatt3rton » Sun Sep 18, 2016 9:46 pm

Second road game in a row where the home-team will be treating the game like a mini Super Bowl- which I'm all for.

Trying to match these teams' intensity is a good thing. Intensity is high for divisional game on Sunday night anyway but the Vikes will be super-jacked.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,786
And1: 41,119
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Packers/Queens Leadup 

Post#69 » by emunney » Sun Sep 18, 2016 11:53 pm

Seems weird that they cut Pressley without signing anybody.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,537
And1: 20,240
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: RE: Re: Packers/Queens Leadup 

Post#70 » by WeekapaugGroove » Mon Sep 19, 2016 12:09 am

emunney wrote:Seems weird that they cut Pressley without signing anybody.

Yeah super bizarre roster maneuvering. Assumed they would add a db. I guess it wont matter if he was gonna be inactive this week and if they simply pick him back up next week. Still strange though.
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
KidA24
RealGM
Posts: 10,740
And1: 10,622
Joined: Nov 01, 2012

Re: Packers/Queens Leadup 

Post#71 » by KidA24 » Mon Sep 19, 2016 12:19 am

Fired up for this one.
Let's get our receivers involved with some shorter routes, and lets stop running that stupid pitch to Lacy from the shotgun. I don't think that play has gained yardage ever in the 3 years they've run it.
Amos Barshad: "So you got a job, a place to live, a license? What’s left?"

Giannis: “Nothing. Just get a ring now.”

Return to Green Bay Packers