ImageImage

GT: Pack at Lions

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

bcl20
Starter
Posts: 2,431
And1: 166
Joined: Apr 24, 2006

Re: GT: Pack at Lions 

Post#161 » by bcl20 » Mon Jan 2, 2017 4:39 am

rilamann wrote:I knew the Packers would finish 6-0 after they started 4-6.I was right with you Rodgers,I didn't think you were smoking crack or anything...lol.


It's like they try to find new and challenging ways to win the division. Even when they didn't last year they got a better first round match up out of it.
Go Packers, Go Bulls, Go Cubs, Go Hawkeyes, Go Blackhawks
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,284
And1: 7,931
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: GT: Pack at Lions 

Post#162 » by Mags FTW » Mon Jan 2, 2017 4:39 am

Hyde with anothe play!
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 27,669
And1: 15,197
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: Damn that rilamann!!
     

Re: GT: Pack at Lions 

Post#163 » by rilamann » Mon Jan 2, 2017 4:40 am

Awww no replacement refs on this one Tate ya bitch.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
User avatar
Siefer
RealGM
Posts: 16,056
And1: 6,704
Joined: Nov 05, 2006
     

Re: GT: Pack at Lions 

Post#164 » by Siefer » Mon Jan 2, 2017 4:41 am

Why are we running plays?
bizarro
RealGM
Posts: 14,778
And1: 7,290
Joined: Jul 13, 2005

Re: GT: Pack at Lions 

Post#165 » by bizarro » Mon Jan 2, 2017 4:42 am

Wow. In Vancouver Island. Just saw the score. Saw A Rod's line. Geronimo. And Hyde?!? Tell me the deets, gents.
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 27,669
And1: 15,197
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: Damn that rilamann!!
     

Re: GT: Pack at Lions 

Post#166 » by rilamann » Mon Jan 2, 2017 4:44 am

I'm assuming we'll probably be the Sunday game on Fox.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,684
And1: 27,268
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: GT: Pack at Lions 

Post#167 » by trwi7 » Mon Jan 2, 2017 4:44 am

bizarro wrote:Wow. In Vancouver Island.


Jealous. Beautiful part of the world.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
Siefer
RealGM
Posts: 16,056
And1: 6,704
Joined: Nov 05, 2006
     

Re: GT: Pack at Lions 

Post#168 » by Siefer » Mon Jan 2, 2017 4:48 am

...........
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 19,357
And1: 4,165
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: GT: Pack at Lions 

Post#169 » by BUCKnation » Mon Jan 2, 2017 4:48 am

b2b wtf plays
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,684
And1: 27,268
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: GT: Pack at Lions 

Post#170 » by trwi7 » Mon Jan 2, 2017 4:49 am

Somehow this game isn't over because we still have no clue how to defend hail marys.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 27,669
And1: 15,197
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: Damn that rilamann!!
     

Re: GT: Pack at Lions 

Post#171 » by rilamann » Mon Jan 2, 2017 4:49 am

Brandon Bostick better not be in the building.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,684
And1: 27,268
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: GT: Pack at Lions 

Post#172 » by trwi7 » Mon Jan 2, 2017 4:49 am

Of course that play doesn't happen if Schum could kick it further than a 5 year old.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,284
And1: 7,931
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: GT: Pack at Lions 

Post#173 » by Mags FTW » Mon Jan 2, 2017 4:50 am

We've already given up 1 onside this year. Another one and Zook should walk home.
User avatar
ampd
RealGM
Posts: 21,582
And1: 5,031
Joined: Dec 06, 2010

Re: GT: Pack at Lions 

Post#174 » by ampd » Mon Jan 2, 2017 4:50 am

Two of their guys could have caught that and zero packers :lol:
mnstinks
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,654
And1: 43
Joined: Jun 28, 2006

Re: GT: Pack at Lions 

Post#175 » by mnstinks » Mon Jan 2, 2017 4:52 am

Burnett didn't even try
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 27,669
And1: 15,197
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: Damn that rilamann!!
     

Re: GT: Pack at Lions 

Post#176 » by rilamann » Mon Jan 2, 2017 4:53 am

It's funny to think there is actually a situation where you could say that if Richard Rodgers was on the field Aaron Rodgers would have played in 2 Super Bowls.

Talking about had he been on the field instead of Bostick vs Seattle.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
WiscoKing13
RealGM
Posts: 11,975
And1: 1,441
Joined: Jan 03, 2009
     

Re: GT: Pack at Lions 

Post#177 » by WiscoKing13 » Mon Jan 2, 2017 4:54 am

trwi7 wrote:Of course that play doesn't happen if Schum could kick it further than a 5 year old.

Or MM just kneels the ball instead of running the ball on first down where a guy gets hurt and we have to use a TO.
DanoMac wrote:
bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.


I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
mnstinks
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,654
And1: 43
Joined: Jun 28, 2006

Re: GT: Pack at Lions 

Post#178 » by mnstinks » Mon Jan 2, 2017 4:55 am

Line was 49. Sucks to be under
User avatar
LikeABosh
RealGM
Posts: 19,080
And1: 8,821
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
     

Re: GT: Pack at Lions 

Post#179 » by LikeABosh » Mon Jan 2, 2017 4:58 am

trwi7 wrote:Of course that play doesn't happen if Schum could kick it further than a 5 year old.


How many Jacob Schums could a 5 year old beat up?

Return to Green Bay Packers