ImageImage

Game 5: Packers at Bucs - 3:25 - FOX

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

awd4cy
Analyst
Posts: 3,315
And1: 1,882
Joined: Nov 23, 2013
     

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bucs - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#181 » by awd4cy » Mon Oct 19, 2020 3:23 am

humanrefutation wrote:The Vikings and Saints are not bad teams. And we beat them both "on the the road."

The Vikings aren’t bad?
James1980
Veteran
Posts: 2,858
And1: 500
Joined: Jul 02, 2003
Location: Milwaukee
     

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bucs - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#182 » by James1980 » Mon Oct 19, 2020 3:27 am

humanrefutation wrote:The Vikings and Saints are not bad teams. And we beat them both "on the the road."


The Vikings are ass and the Saints aren't as good as last year.
NotYoAvgNBAFan wrote:I overlook foolishness.
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,449
And1: 29,223
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bucs - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#183 » by Ron Swanson » Mon Oct 19, 2020 1:13 pm

At this point I can't even deny the "Rodgers gets tunnel vision with Davante" narrative. It's a thing.

Defense played like ass but the offense can't gift the other team 14 points in less than a minute, then do absolutely nothing after their first two drives. Let's hope this was the worst Rodgers game of the year, cuz that was bad....
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,750
And1: 16,427
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bucs - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#184 » by humanrefutation » Mon Oct 19, 2020 4:55 pm

awd4cy wrote:
humanrefutation wrote:The Vikings and Saints are not bad teams. And we beat them both "on the the road."

The Vikings aren’t bad?


No. If you're going to argue that the Packers aren't as good as their record because of who've they've played, then you have to treat the Vikings the same way. The Vikings have two one-point losses on their resumes against undefeated teams. Their only really bad loss was to a Falcons team yesterday that could easily be around 0.500 without some epic collapses.

They're not good, but they aren't as bad as their record indicates, IMO.
HKPackFan
RealGM
Posts: 15,515
And1: 10,861
Joined: Jan 14, 2014
Location: Hong Kong
   

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bucs - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#185 » by HKPackFan » Mon Oct 19, 2020 5:24 pm

BJ Sandered wrote:
PintSizedBox10 wrote:
BJ Sandered wrote:The Packers always seem to suck when they play in Tampa.
When they play a good team*

Sent from my SM-G981U using RealGM mobile app

Well sure, that's true. :lol:

But as an example of what I'm talking about... they lost in Tampa to the Josh Freeman lead 3-13 Buccaneers in 2009.



I was there, that was a terrible game.

At least the night life had lots of options. :party:
#FreeChuckDiesel
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 35,691
And1: 26,128
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bucs - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#186 » by Matches Malone » Mon Oct 19, 2020 5:29 pm

Who are the top defensive coordinators available that we could get? I'd imagine Zimmer or Patricia (if fired) might provide an upgrade on that side of the ball?
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,498
And1: 9,842
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bucs - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#187 » by M-C-G » Mon Oct 19, 2020 7:43 pm

Rodgers looked like he reverted back to the guy from last year a bit.
Defense doesn't seem to be getting to the QB as much, but that is just a gut feel and not sure if stats back that up.
I'd like to see some more AJ Dillon, that should be a thing. Dude runs hard.
St. Brown didn't look very up to speed.
Josh Jackson, woof. I was so excited about that draft pick and we either need to find a way to use him differently or trade his ass. We don't really need Njoku but I bet a one for one swap would work for both teams.
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,316
And1: 11,415
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bucs - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#188 » by Turk Nowitzki » Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:04 pm

Tampa Bay is a cursed place for us it seems.

Rodgers played like **** but hopefully it was just a one-off. The offensive line and WR's did him zero favors yesterday but he also looked like the Rodgers that everyone was getting frustrated with last year.
Treebeard
General Manager
Posts: 7,653
And1: 1,885
Joined: Jun 17, 2009
Location: Out in the Driftless Area
     

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bucs - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#189 » by Treebeard » Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:25 pm

M-C-G wrote:Rodgers looked like he reverted back to the guy from last year a bit.

He seemed (to me...) to be looking too hard for Adams

M-C-G wrote:Defense doesn't seem to be getting to the QB as much, but that is just a gut feel and not sure if stats back that up.

Z was dinged up, and Preston has largely disappeared as a pass rusher this year. Is that the way that Pettine is using him, or is he off? Gary has started to look like an NFL player though.

M-C-G wrote:I'd like to see some more AJ Dillon, that should be a thing. Dude runs hard.

Yes, please. He also looks like he can block some too and LaFleur did have him squirt through the line at least once that I saw as a potential receiver.

M-C-G wrote:St. Brown didn't look very up to speed.

Oh yeah, there were definitely chunks of rust falling off him as he went downfield. Hopefully, that rustiness goes away fast.

M-C-G wrote:Josh Jackson, woof. I was so excited about that draft pick and we either need to find a way to use him differently or trade his ass. We don't really need Njoku but I bet a one for one swap would work for both teams.

Yup, Jackson just looks both slow and too often lost.
*******************************************************
User avatar
tski1972
Head Coach
Posts: 6,291
And1: 3,760
Joined: May 24, 2011
Location: Wow-saw, WI
Contact:
     

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bucs - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#190 » by tski1972 » Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:29 pm

Has anyone brought up the fact the Bucs were offsides on the second INT?

Image
http://twitter.com/MarkIsOld

Image

"Because of Giannis, the once lousy Bucks are back in the NBA conversation." - 60 Minutes
User avatar
StickeeFingaz
RealGM
Posts: 11,202
And1: 7,071
Joined: Jul 12, 2009
     

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bucs - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#191 » by StickeeFingaz » Mon Oct 19, 2020 10:07 pm

tski1972 wrote:Has anyone brought up the fact the Bucs were offsides on the second INT?

Image


I noticed it live and the Fox crew didn't say a word.
#FreeChuckDiesel
HKPackFan
RealGM
Posts: 15,515
And1: 10,861
Joined: Jan 14, 2014
Location: Hong Kong
   

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bucs - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#192 » by HKPackFan » Tue Oct 20, 2020 4:42 am

#FreeChuckDiesel
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,675
And1: 27,265
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bucs - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#193 » by trwi7 » Tue Oct 20, 2020 5:26 am

tski1972 wrote:Has anyone brought up the fact the Bucs were offsides on the second INT?

Image


PaCkErS gEt AlL tHe CaLlS
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 106,656
And1: 41,251
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bucs - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#194 » by ReasonablySober » Tue Oct 20, 2020 1:58 pm

HKPackFan wrote:https://www.forbes.com/sites/robreischel/2020/10/19/aaron-rodgers-latest-stinker-reminds-everyone-why-the-green-bay-packers-drafted-jordan-love/amp/?__twitter_impression=true


Not used to seeing an anti-Rodgers post.


Written by Rob Reischel. Yikes.
User avatar
JimmyTheKid
General Manager
Posts: 9,035
And1: 5,420
Joined: Feb 10, 2009

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bucs - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#195 » by JimmyTheKid » Tue Oct 20, 2020 5:50 pm

Someone on the radio said the Packers offense ran 31 plays for 72 yards when not sending someone in motion. I know we missed Ervin but has LaFleur given an explanation here?

Yes, Rodgers was in his own head after those picks and missing Marcedes for a big gainer, but a big part of the L is on LaFleur for inexplicably going away from what worked through 5 weeks. Thats the one bone to pick with LaFleur. He's gotta do better to stay on script when things aren't going well. They reverted back to snapping the ball with 1 second on the play clock while TB's defenders pinned their ears back and humiliated the OLine/Rodgers. Ugly, ugly football for 3 quarters.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 101,540
And1: 54,787
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bucs - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#196 » by MickeyDavis » Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:44 pm

Read on Twitter
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.

Return to Green Bay Packers