ImageImage

GT: Packers at Texans - Noon - Fox

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,498
And1: 9,842
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: GT: Packers at Texans - Noon - Fox 

Post#121 » by M-C-G » Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:28 pm

Rodgers could not hit anyone in stride, otherwise there were a lot more yards to be had out there. Speaks well for our scheme and play calling IMO
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,498
And1: 9,842
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: GT: Packers at Texans - Noon - Fox 

Post#122 » by M-C-G » Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:30 pm

ReasonablySober wrote:Dillon sucks.


Those five touches really showed you something?
User avatar
chuckleslove
RealGM
Posts: 18,566
And1: 1,128
Joined: Nov 17, 2009
Location: In an RV down by the river
Contact:
     

Re: GT: Packers at Texans - Noon - Fox 

Post#123 » by chuckleslove » Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:35 pm

M-C-G wrote:Rodgers could not hit anyone in stride, otherwise there were a lot more yards to be had out there. Speaks well for our scheme and play calling IMO


Yeah the lone exception was Adams' second TD but he could have had a few nice long passes if he hit a couple others in stride.
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page
User avatar
JimmyTheKid
General Manager
Posts: 9,035
And1: 5,420
Joined: Feb 10, 2009

Re: GT: Packers at Texans - Noon - Fox 

Post#124 » by JimmyTheKid » Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:55 pm

chuckleslove wrote:
M-C-G wrote:Rodgers could not hit anyone in stride, otherwise there were a lot more yards to be had out there. Speaks well for our scheme and play calling IMO


Yeah the lone exception was Adams' second TD but he could have had a few nice long passes if he hit a couple others in stride.


Very true. Its so refreshing to see a play caller/designer actually scheme guys open. Instead of just praying your receiver beats his man one-on-one. Because outside of Davante our pass catchers are pedestrian. Would love to see the front office address our #2 WR before the deadline.
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,498
And1: 9,842
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: GT: Packers at Texans - Noon - Fox 

Post#125 » by M-C-G » Mon Oct 26, 2020 8:10 pm

JimmyTheKid wrote:
chuckleslove wrote:
M-C-G wrote:Rodgers could not hit anyone in stride, otherwise there were a lot more yards to be had out there. Speaks well for our scheme and play calling IMO


Yeah the lone exception was Adams' second TD but he could have had a few nice long passes if he hit a couple others in stride.


Very true. Its so refreshing to see a play caller/designer actually scheme guys open. Instead of just praying your receiver beats his man one-on-one. Because outside of Davante our pass catchers are pedestrian. Would love to see the front office address our #2 WR before the deadline.


It's pretty incredible to just see guys wide open on something other than Rodgers running around extending plays for 5 seconds. Big Mac's offense stopped working when teams realized that if they just stop having their CBs commit to a direction against our WRs, our WRs wouldn't know which route to break into. Mind numbing stuff.
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,498
And1: 9,842
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: GT: Packers at Texans - Noon - Fox 

Post#126 » by M-C-G » Mon Oct 26, 2020 8:16 pm

I could be wrong, but other than the Tampa Bay game, I think we have been up by 20 points in every game in the with under 4 minutes left in the game.
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,049
And1: 14,927
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: GT: Packers at Texans - Noon - Fox 

Post#127 » by Ayt » Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:13 pm

JimmyTheKid wrote:
chuckleslove wrote:
M-C-G wrote:Rodgers could not hit anyone in stride, otherwise there were a lot more yards to be had out there. Speaks well for our scheme and play calling IMO


Yeah the lone exception was Adams' second TD but he could have had a few nice long passes if he hit a couple others in stride.


Very true. Its so refreshing to see a play caller/designer actually scheme guys open. Instead of just praying your receiver beats his man one-on-one. Because outside of Davante our pass catchers are pedestrian. Would love to see the front office address our #2 WR before the deadline.


Lazard looked great before he got hurt and he'll be back.
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,498
And1: 9,842
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: GT: Packers at Texans - Noon - Fox 

Post#128 » by M-C-G » Tue Oct 27, 2020 8:48 pm

Ayt wrote:
JimmyTheKid wrote:
chuckleslove wrote:
Yeah the lone exception was Adams' second TD but he could have had a few nice long passes if he hit a couple others in stride.


Very true. Its so refreshing to see a play caller/designer actually scheme guys open. Instead of just praying your receiver beats his man one-on-one. Because outside of Davante our pass catchers are pedestrian. Would love to see the front office address our #2 WR before the deadline.


Lazard looked great before he got hurt and he'll be back.


I was extremely skeptical of this group of pass catchers. But a lot of you guys were right about Lazard, MVS has been able to at least stretch the field, the TE group emerged more production than the last three years combined and the RBs have been great. Lot more weapons than I gave us credit for.

Also hoping St. Brown can shake off the rust yet.

Return to Green Bay Packers