And four turnovers. Look, I am not happy about our d but our offense screwed them in the second half. It’s not reasonable to expect a d with a bad coordinator to hold up when they are on the field that long. I simply want to acknowledge the offense f-ed us too and their inability to adjust to the adjustments of the colts D is a problem
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation
Re: Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX
- M-C-G
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,498
- And1: 9,842
- Joined: Jan 13, 2013
-
Re: Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,049
- And1: 14,927
- Joined: Jun 27, 2005
Re: Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX
M-C-G wrote:I am going to say on at least three occasions I noticed Amos had a decision to either explode forward and make a play or sit back on his heels and get run over for a first down. I am not sure if this is coached or something , but seems like a big problem with this defense for at least two years. Wait and play it safe and drag the guy down for three extra yards versus attack.
I think there is a lot of legitimate talent on this defense and it is being held back other than a few guys. Also, no more Preston Williams in coverage for the love of God.
They have no other options. You want to have looks where the OLB lines up like a rusher but drops back to give the offense different looks. You don't want Z or Gary in coverage. The only other option they have is Burks who has started taking reps at OLB, but he's useless as a rusher.
Re: Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,653
- And1: 1,885
- Joined: Jun 17, 2009
- Location: Out in the Driftless Area
-
Re: Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX
Ayt wrote:M-C-G wrote:I am going to say on at least three occasions I noticed Amos had a decision to either explode forward and make a play or sit back on his heels and get run over for a first down. I am not sure if this is coached or something , but seems like a big problem with this defense for at least two years. Wait and play it safe and drag the guy down for three extra yards versus attack.
I think there is a lot of legitimate talent on this defense and it is being held back other than a few guys. Also, no more Preston Williams in coverage for the love of God.
They have no other options. You want to have looks where the OLB lines up like a rusher but drops back to give the offense different looks. You don't want Z or Gary in coverage. The only other option they have is Burks who has started taking reps at OLB, but he's useless as a rusher.
So we miss Fackerl more than we thought? If that's so, it's a double hit - Fackerl's gone and Preston is functionally sidelined. Smith has too often been pretty weak in coverage - that's just not in his skill set.
*******************************************************