ImageImage

GT: Bucky at Boilermakers - 2:00 - BTN

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

DrWood
Head Coach
Posts: 6,496
And1: 2,383
Joined: Jul 08, 2014

Re: GT: Bucky at Boilermakers - 2:00 - BTN 

Post#21 » by DrWood » Sat Oct 23, 2021 10:18 pm

It's a big IF, but if they beat Iowa, they have a good chance of getting in the Big10 championship game. And the conference doesn't have any elite teams (just a bunch of pretty good ones), so there'd be a chance to win the conference.
neiLz
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,617
And1: 1,755
Joined: Oct 04, 2011
Location: Riverwest
     

Re: GT: Bucky at Boilermakers - 2:00 - BTN 

Post#22 » by neiLz » Sat Oct 23, 2021 10:19 pm

Kerb Hohl wrote:This is what I was thinking the rest of the way. Unfortunately Mertz is Stave with worse INT problems but other than Iowa or maybe @Minnesota all of these games should be winnable by doing exactly that.

This team isn’t anything special (well, the defense is) but it’s closer to some of the mediocre Badger teams of the past 20-30 years that can beat up on the lean part of the schedule. Front-loaded schedule made things look worse than they really were.

The turnovers have been a killer. Penn State could have been an easy win without those fumbles. They had a shot vs Notre Dame going into the 4th and shot themselves In the foot.

If they get 7-8 wins considering the start that's good but they are wasting elite defense after elite defense. They supposedly find their stud qb and he's mediocre and they forget out to run or pass block.

Hopefully they found something with the run game. However they need mertz to make a play. He needs to develop.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,459
And1: 4,422
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: GT: Bucky at Boilermakers - 2:00 - BTN 

Post#23 » by Kerb Hohl » Sat Oct 23, 2021 10:24 pm

neiLz wrote:
Kerb Hohl wrote:This is what I was thinking the rest of the way. Unfortunately Mertz is Stave with worse INT problems but other than Iowa or maybe @Minnesota all of these games should be winnable by doing exactly that.

This team isn’t anything special (well, the defense is) but it’s closer to some of the mediocre Badger teams of the past 20-30 years that can beat up on the lean part of the schedule. Front-loaded schedule made things look worse than they really were.

The turnovers have been a killer. Penn State could have been an easy win without those fumbles. They had a shot vs Notre Dame going into the 4th and shot themselves In the foot.

If they get 7-8 wins considering the start that's good but they are wasting elite defense after elite defense. They supposedly find their stud qb and he's mediocre and they forget out to run or pass block.

Hopefully they found something with the run game. However they need mertz to make a play. He needs to develop.


I’m not necessarily celebrating this and yeah it’s frustrating that they are somewhat wasting this defense, but really just a response to the “this team might only win 4 games” nonsense from early in the year.
sdn40
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,368
And1: 1,418
Joined: Jun 23, 2010

Re: GT: Bucky at Boilermakers - 2:00 - BTN 

Post#24 » by sdn40 » Sun Oct 24, 2021 1:47 pm

It's 2021 not 1921. If your QB is 5-8 and 50 yards, things are as bad as they seem.
Feel free to chase the mirage, but just like the "Mertz for Heisman" last year, you'll just end up with a mouthful of sand.
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,274
And1: 7,915
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: GT: Bucky at Boilermakers - 2:00 - BTN 

Post#25 » by Mags FTW » Mon Oct 25, 2021 1:46 pm

They're basically the '93 Badgers at this point.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,459
And1: 4,422
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: GT: Bucky at Boilermakers - 2:00 - BTN 

Post#26 » by Kerb Hohl » Mon Oct 25, 2021 2:44 pm

The skill position players aren't great, though RB is looking better and better...but if we had a crystal ball before the year and knew Mertz would be this bad (which I had feared, to some extent) we'd have been in the same position saying, "this team is Jack Coan away from being a Rose Bowl team and Russell Wilson away from the playoffs.

But here we are, a team with a very good defense and solid running game, trash QB/passing game. As usual, though I guess a bit different than the pre-Aranda days.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,459
And1: 4,422
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: GT: Bucky at Boilermakers - 2:00 - BTN 

Post#27 » by Kerb Hohl » Mon Oct 25, 2021 2:57 pm

midranger wrote:I’m good with promoting Leonard on the bud ride home. Chryst can get some emeritus job in the AD or something.

That super slow developing play on 2nd down when he knows our LT can’t block a pass rushing chair, broke me.


This will be an interesting debate and I actually have kinda flipped my take a bit.

Obviously I'd rather have Leonhard stay than not. I acknowledged I'd want a bit more of a modern touch on the team/offense even though we have to stay with who we are and earlier this year noted that I'd replace Chryst even though this team isn't the dumpster fire the Joe Public fans think it is.

All of that said - do we want Jim Leonhard spending 90% of his time recruiting? Obviously we may not be able to keep him forever as a highly paid coordinator, though I do hope he stays around with his young kids and NFL money as the HC in waiting or whatever might be happening...but there is also the downside of Leonhard as HC is he loses some of his time spent on running the defense anyways.

Either way, we just need to keep the meathead families like the Watts and Chenals procreating within the state borders.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 101,535
And1: 54,785
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: GT: Bucky at Boilermakers - 2:00 - BTN 

Post#28 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Oct 25, 2021 5:41 pm

Kerb Hohl wrote:
midranger wrote:I’m good with promoting Leonard on the bud ride home. Chryst can get some emeritus job in the AD or something.

That super slow developing play on 2nd down when he knows our LT can’t block a pass rushing chair, broke me.


This will be an interesting debate and I actually have kinda flipped my take a bit.

Obviously I'd rather have Leonhard stay than not. I acknowledged I'd want a bit more of a modern touch on the team/offense even though we have to stay with who we are and earlier this year noted that I'd replace Chryst even though this team isn't the dumpster fire the Joe Public fans think it is.

All of that said - do we want Jim Leonhard spending 90% of his time recruiting? Obviously we may not be able to keep him forever as a highly paid coordinator, though I do hope he stays around with his young kids and NFL money as the HC in waiting or whatever might be happening...but there is also the downside of Leonhard as HC is he loses some of his time spent on running the defense anyways.

Either way, we just need to keep the meathead families like the Watts and Chenals procreating within the state borders.

Although Millen doesn't make sense a lot of time he did make sense talking about Leonard and how being a top coordinator doesn't make you a good coach automatically and that taking him away from the defense full time would be a detriment. Of course if he leaves it's a detriment too. I'm really curious what Leonard is thinking. The next step is college HC or NFL coordinator.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.

Return to Green Bay Packers