ImageImage

Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Adams Traded to Raiders for 2022 1st and 2nd Rd Picks

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

Treebeard
General Manager
Posts: 7,865
And1: 1,962
Joined: Jun 17, 2009
Location: Out in the Driftless Area
     

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50 

Post#1161 » by Treebeard » Tue Mar 15, 2022 5:48 pm

Burks to the Niners
49ers Signing LB Oren Burks To Two-Year, $5M Contract https://bit.ly/3MUoAyO
*******************************************************
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50 

Post#1162 » by WeekapaugGroove » Tue Mar 15, 2022 5:57 pm

Read on Twitter
?t=rYXQQkmTZSjnKKn4ZOEqBA&s=19

The praise for Gute regarding the Rodgers situation feels a lot like when a NBA GM gets praised for moving a bad contract..that he gave out. Like yeah he fixed a mess but he also created the mess to begin with.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
User avatar
IrishRainbow
Veteran
Posts: 2,858
And1: 928
Joined: Oct 24, 2006
Location: @ the drawing table
     

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50 

Post#1163 » by IrishRainbow » Tue Mar 15, 2022 8:57 pm

LUKE23 wrote:
soboMP3 wrote:
LUKE23 wrote:We better be trading Love to the highest bidder.

So two bags of balls?


Hopefully a 2nd but would take a 3rd.


Does Indy have any of the perceived draft night interest now that they’ve moved on from Wentz?
Treebeard
General Manager
Posts: 7,865
And1: 1,962
Joined: Jun 17, 2009
Location: Out in the Driftless Area
     

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50 

Post#1164 » by Treebeard » Tue Mar 15, 2022 10:01 pm

IrishRainbow wrote:
LUKE23 wrote:
soboMP3 wrote:So two bags of balls?


Hopefully a 2nd but would take a 3rd.


Does Indy have any of the perceived draft night interest now that they’ve moved on from Wentz?


I wonder....

On their pundit described short list, Trubisky's gone to the Steelers, Watson's seemingly out of play for the Colts, Wilson's gone to Denver, Murray's snit may get him a renegotiated contract in AZ, Brady and Rogers are staying put.

That leaves a smaller pool of potential vets: Garapolo? and Mayfield???. One of the draftee QB's in a less than stellar class.

Love may not look so bad to them (no pun intended)


*edit* Cousins staying put too.
*******************************************************
Treebeard
General Manager
Posts: 7,865
And1: 1,962
Joined: Jun 17, 2009
Location: Out in the Driftless Area
     

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50 

Post#1165 » by Treebeard » Tue Mar 15, 2022 10:08 pm

Via Packers.com

Packers awarded two compensatory picks in 2022 NFL Draft

Green Bay receives extra selections in fourth and seventh rounds

Mar 15, 2022 at 04:59 PM

Wes Hodkiewicz


For Corey Linsley and Jamall Williams
*******************************************************
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,884
And1: 29,796
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50 

Post#1166 » by Ron Swanson » Tue Mar 15, 2022 10:18 pm

Teams looking for a potential franchise QB are definitely gonna gauge the market on Love. Garrapola and Mayfield would just be placeholders for the next guy. They're 30 and 26 respectively. That's why a lot of us were arguing that it's still a good investment to hang onto a young, talented, back-up QB. Look no further than what the Pats did with the aforementioned Jimmy G when they traded him to San Fran for a 2nd round pick after he started all of 2-games.

Take it with a grain of salt, but Mel Kiper apparently grades Love higher than any QB in this current draft class. Wouldn't surprise me if some team was willing to cough up a high 2nd round pick considering how weak this class is. Ironically would really shut up the "we wasted a draft pick on Jordan Love" crowd.

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/draft-impact-of-brady-news-big-qb-signings/id304434112?i=1000554004588
User avatar
MoMM
RealGM
Posts: 10,584
And1: 1,775
Joined: Jan 08, 2002
Location: Brazilian in Barcelona
Contact:
       

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50 

Post#1167 » by MoMM » Tue Mar 15, 2022 11:15 pm

Ron Swanson wrote:Teams looking for a potential franchise QB are definitely gonna gauge the market on Love. Garrapola and Mayfield would just be placeholders for the next guy. They're 30 and 26 respectively. That's why a lot of us were arguing that it's still a good investment to hang onto a young, talented, back-up QB. Look no further than what the Pats did with the aforementioned Jimmy G when they traded him to San Fran for a 2nd round pick after he started all of 2-games.

Take it with a grain of salt, but Mel Kiper apparently grades Love higher than any QB in this current draft class. Wouldn't surprise me if some team was willing to cough up a high 2nd round pick considering how weak this class is. Ironically would really shut up the "we wasted a draft pick on Jordan Love" crowd.

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/draft-impact-of-brady-news-big-qb-signings/id304434112?i=1000554004588

Yes, 1st+4th for 2nd... great deal!
User avatar
Wisky4life
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,337
And1: 1,235
Joined: Feb 05, 2014
Contact:

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50 

Post#1168 » by Wisky4life » Tue Mar 15, 2022 11:37 pm

Anyone have thoughts on Punter Johnny Hekker? I'd sign him up.
“We’re going to turn this team around 360 degrees.” –Jason Kidd
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,063
And1: 27,683
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50 

Post#1169 » by trwi7 » Tue Mar 15, 2022 11:50 pm

Ron Swanson wrote:Teams looking for a potential franchise QB are definitely gonna gauge the market on Love. Garrapola and Mayfield would just be placeholders for the next guy. They're 30 and 26 respectively. That's why a lot of us were arguing that it's still a good investment to hang onto a young, talented, back-up QB. Look no further than what the Pats did with the aforementioned Jimmy G when they traded him to San Fran for a 2nd round pick after he started all of 2-games.

Take it with a grain of salt, but Mel Kiper apparently grades Love higher than any QB in this current draft class. Wouldn't surprise me if some team was willing to cough up a high 2nd round pick considering how weak this class is. Ironically would really shut up the "we wasted a draft pick on Jordan Love" crowd.

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/draft-impact-of-brady-news-big-qb-signings/id304434112?i=1000554004588


The Patriots took Garoppolo with the 62nd pick and traded him for the 43rd pick. We traded 30 and 136 to get to 26 and now we're hoping to maybe get a 2nd in return.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,292
And1: 42,511
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50 

Post#1170 » by ReasonablySober » Wed Mar 16, 2022 12:04 am

Wisky4life wrote:Anyone have thoughts on Punter Johnny Hekker? I'd sign him up.


If we don't draft Matt Araiza I will be despondent.
Big Dog Yank
Senior
Posts: 665
And1: 895
Joined: Jan 05, 2014
     

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50 

Post#1171 » by Big Dog Yank » Wed Mar 16, 2022 12:20 am

trwi7 wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote:Teams looking for a potential franchise QB are definitely gonna gauge the market on Love. Garrapola and Mayfield would just be placeholders for the next guy. They're 30 and 26 respectively. That's why a lot of us were arguing that it's still a good investment to hang onto a young, talented, back-up QB. Look no further than what the Pats did with the aforementioned Jimmy G when they traded him to San Fran for a 2nd round pick after he started all of 2-games.

Take it with a grain of salt, but Mel Kiper apparently grades Love higher than any QB in this current draft class. Wouldn't surprise me if some team was willing to cough up a high 2nd round pick considering how weak this class is. Ironically would really shut up the "we wasted a draft pick on Jordan Love" crowd.

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/draft-impact-of-brady-news-big-qb-signings/id304434112?i=1000554004588


The Patriots took Garoppolo with the 62nd pick and traded him for the 43rd pick. We traded 30 and 136 to get to 26 and now we're hoping to maybe get a 2nd in return.


Well, Jimmy G. didn't look like a pile of hot garbage when he got a chance to play.
"Ready to Die"
BallinBucks420
Pro Prospect
Posts: 877
And1: 117
Joined: Apr 17, 2014
     

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50 

Post#1172 » by BallinBucks420 » Wed Mar 16, 2022 12:56 am

ReasonablySober wrote:
Wisky4life wrote:Anyone have thoughts on Punter Johnny Hekker? I'd sign him up.


If we don't draft Matt Araiza I will be despondent.


Do you guys really wanna move on from Bojorquez? he had a solid year i thought punting but his holding did seem to be an issue
Daver
Head Coach
Posts: 7,105
And1: 2,712
Joined: Feb 23, 2019
       

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50 

Post#1173 » by Daver » Wed Mar 16, 2022 2:22 am

BallinBucks420 wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:
Wisky4life wrote:Anyone have thoughts on Punter Johnny Hekker? I'd sign him up.


If we don't draft Matt Araiza I will be despondent.


Do you guys really wanna move on from Bojorquez? he had a solid year i thought punting but his holding did seem to be an issue



Dude had a great year not sure where he ranked but his punting wasnt the issue on STs not sure about his holding though but when you dont block guys up front does it really matter
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 104,345
And1: 56,513
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50 

Post#1174 » by MickeyDavis » Wed Mar 16, 2022 2:32 am

Read on Twitter
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,292
And1: 42,511
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50 

Post#1175 » by ReasonablySober » Wed Mar 16, 2022 2:52 am

BallinBucks420 wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:
Wisky4life wrote:Anyone have thoughts on Punter Johnny Hekker? I'd sign him up.


If we don't draft Matt Araiza I will be despondent.


Do you guys really wanna move on from Bojorquez? he had a solid year i thought punting but his holding did seem to be an issue


I just think he's going to be a crazy field flipping weapon in the NFL.
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,884
And1: 29,796
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50 

Post#1176 » by Ron Swanson » Wed Mar 16, 2022 4:19 am

MoMM wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote:Teams looking for a potential franchise QB are definitely gonna gauge the market on Love. Garrapola and Mayfield would just be placeholders for the next guy. They're 30 and 26 respectively. That's why a lot of us were arguing that it's still a good investment to hang onto a young, talented, back-up QB. Look no further than what the Pats did with the aforementioned Jimmy G when they traded him to San Fran for a 2nd round pick after he started all of 2-games.

Take it with a grain of salt, but Mel Kiper apparently grades Love higher than any QB in this current draft class. Wouldn't surprise me if some team was willing to cough up a high 2nd round pick considering how weak this class is. Ironically would really shut up the "we wasted a draft pick on Jordan Love" crowd.

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/draft-impact-of-brady-news-big-qb-signings/id304434112?i=1000554004588

Yes, 1st+4th for 2nd... great deal!


Moved back 10 spots in the draft and gave up a 4th rounder for insurance on the franchise QB. Who cares?
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,292
And1: 42,511
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50 

Post#1177 » by ReasonablySober » Wed Mar 16, 2022 4:30 am

Ron Swanson wrote:
MoMM wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote:Teams looking for a potential franchise QB are definitely gonna gauge the market on Love. Garrapola and Mayfield would just be placeholders for the next guy. They're 30 and 26 respectively. That's why a lot of us were arguing that it's still a good investment to hang onto a young, talented, back-up QB. Look no further than what the Pats did with the aforementioned Jimmy G when they traded him to San Fran for a 2nd round pick after he started all of 2-games.

Take it with a grain of salt, but Mel Kiper apparently grades Love higher than any QB in this current draft class. Wouldn't surprise me if some team was willing to cough up a high 2nd round pick considering how weak this class is. Ironically would really shut up the "we wasted a draft pick on Jordan Love" crowd.

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/draft-impact-of-brady-news-big-qb-signings/id304434112?i=1000554004588

Yes, 1st+4th for 2nd... great deal!


Moved back 10 spots in the draft and gave up a 4th rounder for insurance on the franchise QB. Who cares?


I've defended the pick, but it was a 1st rounder that didn't contribute in Rodgers' prime. With hindsight it's pretty easy to see it as a huge L.
User avatar
MoMM
RealGM
Posts: 10,584
And1: 1,775
Joined: Jan 08, 2002
Location: Brazilian in Barcelona
Contact:
       

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50 

Post#1178 » by MoMM » Wed Mar 16, 2022 8:44 am

Big Dog Yank wrote:
trwi7 wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote:Teams looking for a potential franchise QB are definitely gonna gauge the market on Love. Garrapola and Mayfield would just be placeholders for the next guy. They're 30 and 26 respectively. That's why a lot of us were arguing that it's still a good investment to hang onto a young, talented, back-up QB. Look no further than what the Pats did with the aforementioned Jimmy G when they traded him to San Fran for a 2nd round pick after he started all of 2-games.

Take it with a grain of salt, but Mel Kiper apparently grades Love higher than any QB in this current draft class. Wouldn't surprise me if some team was willing to cough up a high 2nd round pick considering how weak this class is. Ironically would really shut up the "we wasted a draft pick on Jordan Love" crowd.

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/draft-impact-of-brady-news-big-qb-signings/id304434112?i=1000554004588


The Patriots took Garoppolo with the 62nd pick and traded him for the 43rd pick. We traded 30 and 136 to get to 26 and now we're hoping to maybe get a 2nd in return.


Well, Jimmy G. didn't look like a pile of hot garbage when he got a chance to play.

So the original point remains, he still is a waste of 1st round pick.
User avatar
MoMM
RealGM
Posts: 10,584
And1: 1,775
Joined: Jan 08, 2002
Location: Brazilian in Barcelona
Contact:
       

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50 

Post#1179 » by MoMM » Wed Mar 16, 2022 8:51 am

Ron Swanson wrote:
MoMM wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote:Teams looking for a potential franchise QB are definitely gonna gauge the market on Love. Garrapola and Mayfield would just be placeholders for the next guy. They're 30 and 26 respectively. That's why a lot of us were arguing that it's still a good investment to hang onto a young, talented, back-up QB. Look no further than what the Pats did with the aforementioned Jimmy G when they traded him to San Fran for a 2nd round pick after he started all of 2-games.

Take it with a grain of salt, but Mel Kiper apparently grades Love higher than any QB in this current draft class. Wouldn't surprise me if some team was willing to cough up a high 2nd round pick considering how weak this class is. Ironically would really shut up the "we wasted a draft pick on Jordan Love" crowd.

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/draft-impact-of-brady-news-big-qb-signings/id304434112?i=1000554004588

Yes, 1st+4th for 2nd... great deal!


Moved back 10 spots in the draft and gave up a 4th rounder for insurance on the franchise QB. Who cares?

Bad insurance, IMO. A good insurance is having Nick Foles as a backup QB, not a rookie QB who every scout knew before the draft that clearly wasn't ready (and after some years he still isn't). Even if the insurance is planning for the future (in case Rodgers leaves), we would have wasted some cheap years of his contract.

If we had drafted a WR we would be way better in the previous seasons and we wouldn't need to re-sign Adams, MVS and Lazard to keep our WR depth good, because we would have a young WR in a rookie and cheap contract, instead we have to pay almost 4mil for our backup QB. Perhaps Rodgers wouldn't even have asked for Cobb, because our WR depth would be better in first place and he could trust them.
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,884
And1: 29,796
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50 

Post#1180 » by Ron Swanson » Wed Mar 16, 2022 1:08 pm

Oh I'm not saying they didn't end up losing value even if they get great pick compensation for Love. Of course they did. The point is that I'm pretty sure Pats fans didn't really care that they spent a Top-60 draft pick on Brady insurance for 3 years when they won 2 Super Bowls in that span, then ended up with a nice draft pick anyways. If I burn a late-1st and get a differed early-2nd rounder two years later when my roster has more holes to fill?

Image

Return to Green Bay Packers