49ers Signing LB Oren Burks To Two-Year, $5M Contract https://bit.ly/3MUoAyO
Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Adams Traded to Raiders for 2022 1st and 2nd Rd Picks
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
-
Treebeard
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,865
- And1: 1,962
- Joined: Jun 17, 2009
- Location: Out in the Driftless Area
-
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
Burks to the Niners
*******************************************************
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
-
WeekapaugGroove
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,538
- And1: 20,241
- Joined: Feb 07, 2010
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
?t=rYXQQkmTZSjnKKn4ZOEqBA&s=19
The praise for Gute regarding the Rodgers situation feels a lot like when a NBA GM gets praised for moving a bad contract..that he gave out. Like yeah he fixed a mess but he also created the mess to begin with.
Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
The praise for Gute regarding the Rodgers situation feels a lot like when a NBA GM gets praised for moving a bad contract..that he gave out. Like yeah he fixed a mess but he also created the mess to begin with.
Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
- IrishRainbow
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,858
- And1: 928
- Joined: Oct 24, 2006
- Location: @ the drawing table
-
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
LUKE23 wrote:soboMP3 wrote:LUKE23 wrote:We better be trading Love to the highest bidder.
So two bags of balls?
Hopefully a 2nd but would take a 3rd.
Does Indy have any of the perceived draft night interest now that they’ve moved on from Wentz?
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
-
Treebeard
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,865
- And1: 1,962
- Joined: Jun 17, 2009
- Location: Out in the Driftless Area
-
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
IrishRainbow wrote:LUKE23 wrote:soboMP3 wrote:So two bags of balls?
Hopefully a 2nd but would take a 3rd.
Does Indy have any of the perceived draft night interest now that they’ve moved on from Wentz?
I wonder....
On their pundit described short list, Trubisky's gone to the Steelers, Watson's seemingly out of play for the Colts, Wilson's gone to Denver, Murray's snit may get him a renegotiated contract in AZ, Brady and Rogers are staying put.
That leaves a smaller pool of potential vets: Garapolo? and Mayfield???. One of the draftee QB's in a less than stellar class.
Love may not look so bad to them (no pun intended)
*edit* Cousins staying put too.
*******************************************************
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
-
Treebeard
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,865
- And1: 1,962
- Joined: Jun 17, 2009
- Location: Out in the Driftless Area
-
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
Via Packers.com
For Corey Linsley and Jamall Williams
Packers awarded two compensatory picks in 2022 NFL Draft
Green Bay receives extra selections in fourth and seventh rounds
Mar 15, 2022 at 04:59 PM
Wes Hodkiewicz
For Corey Linsley and Jamall Williams
*******************************************************
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
- Ron Swanson
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,884
- And1: 29,796
- Joined: May 15, 2013
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
Teams looking for a potential franchise QB are definitely gonna gauge the market on Love. Garrapola and Mayfield would just be placeholders for the next guy. They're 30 and 26 respectively. That's why a lot of us were arguing that it's still a good investment to hang onto a young, talented, back-up QB. Look no further than what the Pats did with the aforementioned Jimmy G when they traded him to San Fran for a 2nd round pick after he started all of 2-games.
Take it with a grain of salt, but Mel Kiper apparently grades Love higher than any QB in this current draft class. Wouldn't surprise me if some team was willing to cough up a high 2nd round pick considering how weak this class is. Ironically would really shut up the "we wasted a draft pick on Jordan Love" crowd.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/draft-impact-of-brady-news-big-qb-signings/id304434112?i=1000554004588
Take it with a grain of salt, but Mel Kiper apparently grades Love higher than any QB in this current draft class. Wouldn't surprise me if some team was willing to cough up a high 2nd round pick considering how weak this class is. Ironically would really shut up the "we wasted a draft pick on Jordan Love" crowd.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/draft-impact-of-brady-news-big-qb-signings/id304434112?i=1000554004588
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
- MoMM
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,584
- And1: 1,775
- Joined: Jan 08, 2002
- Location: Brazilian in Barcelona
- Contact:
-
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
Ron Swanson wrote:Teams looking for a potential franchise QB are definitely gonna gauge the market on Love. Garrapola and Mayfield would just be placeholders for the next guy. They're 30 and 26 respectively. That's why a lot of us were arguing that it's still a good investment to hang onto a young, talented, back-up QB. Look no further than what the Pats did with the aforementioned Jimmy G when they traded him to San Fran for a 2nd round pick after he started all of 2-games.
Take it with a grain of salt, but Mel Kiper apparently grades Love higher than any QB in this current draft class. Wouldn't surprise me if some team was willing to cough up a high 2nd round pick considering how weak this class is. Ironically would really shut up the "we wasted a draft pick on Jordan Love" crowd.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/draft-impact-of-brady-news-big-qb-signings/id304434112?i=1000554004588
Yes, 1st+4th for 2nd... great deal!
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
- Wisky4life
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,337
- And1: 1,235
- Joined: Feb 05, 2014
- Contact:
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
Anyone have thoughts on Punter Johnny Hekker? I'd sign him up.
“We’re going to turn this team around 360 degrees.” –Jason Kidd
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 112,063
- And1: 27,683
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
Ron Swanson wrote:Teams looking for a potential franchise QB are definitely gonna gauge the market on Love. Garrapola and Mayfield would just be placeholders for the next guy. They're 30 and 26 respectively. That's why a lot of us were arguing that it's still a good investment to hang onto a young, talented, back-up QB. Look no further than what the Pats did with the aforementioned Jimmy G when they traded him to San Fran for a 2nd round pick after he started all of 2-games.
Take it with a grain of salt, but Mel Kiper apparently grades Love higher than any QB in this current draft class. Wouldn't surprise me if some team was willing to cough up a high 2nd round pick considering how weak this class is. Ironically would really shut up the "we wasted a draft pick on Jordan Love" crowd.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/draft-impact-of-brady-news-big-qb-signings/id304434112?i=1000554004588
The Patriots took Garoppolo with the 62nd pick and traded him for the 43rd pick. We traded 30 and 136 to get to 26 and now we're hoping to maybe get a 2nd in return.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 108,292
- And1: 42,511
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
Wisky4life wrote:Anyone have thoughts on Punter Johnny Hekker? I'd sign him up.
If we don't draft Matt Araiza I will be despondent.
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
-
Big Dog Yank
- Senior
- Posts: 665
- And1: 895
- Joined: Jan 05, 2014
-
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
trwi7 wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:Teams looking for a potential franchise QB are definitely gonna gauge the market on Love. Garrapola and Mayfield would just be placeholders for the next guy. They're 30 and 26 respectively. That's why a lot of us were arguing that it's still a good investment to hang onto a young, talented, back-up QB. Look no further than what the Pats did with the aforementioned Jimmy G when they traded him to San Fran for a 2nd round pick after he started all of 2-games.
Take it with a grain of salt, but Mel Kiper apparently grades Love higher than any QB in this current draft class. Wouldn't surprise me if some team was willing to cough up a high 2nd round pick considering how weak this class is. Ironically would really shut up the "we wasted a draft pick on Jordan Love" crowd.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/draft-impact-of-brady-news-big-qb-signings/id304434112?i=1000554004588
The Patriots took Garoppolo with the 62nd pick and traded him for the 43rd pick. We traded 30 and 136 to get to 26 and now we're hoping to maybe get a 2nd in return.
Well, Jimmy G. didn't look like a pile of hot garbage when he got a chance to play.
"Ready to Die"
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
-
BallinBucks420
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 877
- And1: 117
- Joined: Apr 17, 2014
-
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
ReasonablySober wrote:Wisky4life wrote:Anyone have thoughts on Punter Johnny Hekker? I'd sign him up.
If we don't draft Matt Araiza I will be despondent.
Do you guys really wanna move on from Bojorquez? he had a solid year i thought punting but his holding did seem to be an issue
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
-
Daver
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,105
- And1: 2,712
- Joined: Feb 23, 2019
-
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
BallinBucks420 wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:Wisky4life wrote:Anyone have thoughts on Punter Johnny Hekker? I'd sign him up.
If we don't draft Matt Araiza I will be despondent.
Do you guys really wanna move on from Bojorquez? he had a solid year i thought punting but his holding did seem to be an issue
Dude had a great year not sure where he ranked but his punting wasnt the issue on STs not sure about his holding though but when you dont block guys up front does it really matter
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
- MickeyDavis
- Global Mod

- Posts: 104,345
- And1: 56,513
- Joined: May 02, 2002
- Location: The Craps Table
-
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 108,292
- And1: 42,511
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
BallinBucks420 wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:Wisky4life wrote:Anyone have thoughts on Punter Johnny Hekker? I'd sign him up.
If we don't draft Matt Araiza I will be despondent.
Do you guys really wanna move on from Bojorquez? he had a solid year i thought punting but his holding did seem to be an issue
I just think he's going to be a crazy field flipping weapon in the NFL.
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
- Ron Swanson
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,884
- And1: 29,796
- Joined: May 15, 2013
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
MoMM wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:Teams looking for a potential franchise QB are definitely gonna gauge the market on Love. Garrapola and Mayfield would just be placeholders for the next guy. They're 30 and 26 respectively. That's why a lot of us were arguing that it's still a good investment to hang onto a young, talented, back-up QB. Look no further than what the Pats did with the aforementioned Jimmy G when they traded him to San Fran for a 2nd round pick after he started all of 2-games.
Take it with a grain of salt, but Mel Kiper apparently grades Love higher than any QB in this current draft class. Wouldn't surprise me if some team was willing to cough up a high 2nd round pick considering how weak this class is. Ironically would really shut up the "we wasted a draft pick on Jordan Love" crowd.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/draft-impact-of-brady-news-big-qb-signings/id304434112?i=1000554004588
Yes, 1st+4th for 2nd... great deal!
Moved back 10 spots in the draft and gave up a 4th rounder for insurance on the franchise QB. Who cares?
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 108,292
- And1: 42,511
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
Ron Swanson wrote:MoMM wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:Teams looking for a potential franchise QB are definitely gonna gauge the market on Love. Garrapola and Mayfield would just be placeholders for the next guy. They're 30 and 26 respectively. That's why a lot of us were arguing that it's still a good investment to hang onto a young, talented, back-up QB. Look no further than what the Pats did with the aforementioned Jimmy G when they traded him to San Fran for a 2nd round pick after he started all of 2-games.
Take it with a grain of salt, but Mel Kiper apparently grades Love higher than any QB in this current draft class. Wouldn't surprise me if some team was willing to cough up a high 2nd round pick considering how weak this class is. Ironically would really shut up the "we wasted a draft pick on Jordan Love" crowd.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/draft-impact-of-brady-news-big-qb-signings/id304434112?i=1000554004588
Yes, 1st+4th for 2nd... great deal!
Moved back 10 spots in the draft and gave up a 4th rounder for insurance on the franchise QB. Who cares?
I've defended the pick, but it was a 1st rounder that didn't contribute in Rodgers' prime. With hindsight it's pretty easy to see it as a huge L.
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
- MoMM
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,584
- And1: 1,775
- Joined: Jan 08, 2002
- Location: Brazilian in Barcelona
- Contact:
-
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
Big Dog Yank wrote:trwi7 wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:Teams looking for a potential franchise QB are definitely gonna gauge the market on Love. Garrapola and Mayfield would just be placeholders for the next guy. They're 30 and 26 respectively. That's why a lot of us were arguing that it's still a good investment to hang onto a young, talented, back-up QB. Look no further than what the Pats did with the aforementioned Jimmy G when they traded him to San Fran for a 2nd round pick after he started all of 2-games.
Take it with a grain of salt, but Mel Kiper apparently grades Love higher than any QB in this current draft class. Wouldn't surprise me if some team was willing to cough up a high 2nd round pick considering how weak this class is. Ironically would really shut up the "we wasted a draft pick on Jordan Love" crowd.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/draft-impact-of-brady-news-big-qb-signings/id304434112?i=1000554004588
The Patriots took Garoppolo with the 62nd pick and traded him for the 43rd pick. We traded 30 and 136 to get to 26 and now we're hoping to maybe get a 2nd in return.
Well, Jimmy G. didn't look like a pile of hot garbage when he got a chance to play.
So the original point remains, he still is a waste of 1st round pick.
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
- MoMM
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,584
- And1: 1,775
- Joined: Jan 08, 2002
- Location: Brazilian in Barcelona
- Contact:
-
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
Ron Swanson wrote:MoMM wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:Teams looking for a potential franchise QB are definitely gonna gauge the market on Love. Garrapola and Mayfield would just be placeholders for the next guy. They're 30 and 26 respectively. That's why a lot of us were arguing that it's still a good investment to hang onto a young, talented, back-up QB. Look no further than what the Pats did with the aforementioned Jimmy G when they traded him to San Fran for a 2nd round pick after he started all of 2-games.
Take it with a grain of salt, but Mel Kiper apparently grades Love higher than any QB in this current draft class. Wouldn't surprise me if some team was willing to cough up a high 2nd round pick considering how weak this class is. Ironically would really shut up the "we wasted a draft pick on Jordan Love" crowd.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/draft-impact-of-brady-news-big-qb-signings/id304434112?i=1000554004588
Yes, 1st+4th for 2nd... great deal!
Moved back 10 spots in the draft and gave up a 4th rounder for insurance on the franchise QB. Who cares?
Bad insurance, IMO. A good insurance is having Nick Foles as a backup QB, not a rookie QB who every scout knew before the draft that clearly wasn't ready (and after some years he still isn't). Even if the insurance is planning for the future (in case Rodgers leaves), we would have wasted some cheap years of his contract.
If we had drafted a WR we would be way better in the previous seasons and we wouldn't need to re-sign Adams, MVS and Lazard to keep our WR depth good, because we would have a young WR in a rookie and cheap contract, instead we have to pay almost 4mil for our backup QB. Perhaps Rodgers wouldn't even have asked for Cobb, because our WR depth would be better in first place and he could trust them.
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
- Ron Swanson
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,884
- And1: 29,796
- Joined: May 15, 2013
Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Campbell Back - 5/50
Oh I'm not saying they didn't end up losing value even if they get great pick compensation for Love. Of course they did. The point is that I'm pretty sure Pats fans didn't really care that they spent a Top-60 draft pick on Brady insurance for 3 years when they won 2 Super Bowls in that span, then ended up with a nice draft pick anyways. If I burn a late-1st and get a differed early-2nd rounder two years later when my roster has more holes to fill?










