ImageImage

2023 College Football Discussion

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
MikeIsGood
RealGM
Posts: 36,193
And1: 12,112
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: Vamos Rafa
     

Re: 2022 College Football Discussion 

Post#1321 » by MikeIsGood » Thu Aug 3, 2023 4:56 am

Market household numbers are the it factor in driving Conference TV deals. Any regional TV deals, sports aside.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,908
And1: 43,004
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: 2022 College Football Discussion 

Post#1322 » by ReasonablySober » Thu Aug 3, 2023 5:03 am

MikeIsGood wrote:Market household numbers are the it factor in driving Conference TV deals. Any regional TV deals, sports aside.


Again, I ask you: why did the Pac 12 die? It had LA and the Bay Area. The contracts expire in 2024 and sports media deals are exploding. You can't even blame Larry Scott.
User avatar
MikeIsGood
RealGM
Posts: 36,193
And1: 12,112
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: Vamos Rafa
     

Re: 2022 College Football Discussion 

Post#1323 » by MikeIsGood » Thu Aug 3, 2023 5:12 am

ReasonablySober wrote:
MikeIsGood wrote:Market household numbers are the it factor in driving Conference TV deals. Any regional TV deals, sports aside.


Again, I ask you: why did the Pac 12 die? It had LA and the Bay Area. The contracts expire in 2024 and sports media deals are exploding. You can't even blame Larry Scott.


They died because the largest schools were in debt, needed more money, knew they could join a conference with more than twice the size and annual cash flow, and jumped ship. Without those largest schools, the rest of the conference equates to a mid major.

Pac 12 didn’t have New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, DC metros, Chicago, and all of our other footprints. We offer like $40M more annually to USC and UCLA. And it was mutually beneficial to gain the LA market.

The end.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,908
And1: 43,004
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: 2022 College Football Discussion 

Post#1324 » by ReasonablySober » Thu Aug 3, 2023 5:21 am

MikeIsGood wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:
MikeIsGood wrote:Market household numbers are the it factor in driving Conference TV deals. Any regional TV deals, sports aside.


Again, I ask you: why did the Pac 12 die? It had LA and the Bay Area. The contracts expire in 2024 and sports media deals are exploding. You can't even blame Larry Scott.


They died because the largest schools were in debt, needed more money, knew they could join a conference with more than twice the size and annual cash flow, and jumped ship. Without those largest schools, the rest of the conference equates to a mid major.

Pac 12 didn’t have New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, DC metros, Chicago, and all of our other footprints. We offer like $40M more annually to USC and UCLA. And it was mutually beneficial to gain the LA market.

The end.


Rutgers and Maryland are doing a lot of work here and no one watches their games.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 40,068
And1: 11,751
Joined: May 12, 2002

Re: 2022 College Football Discussion 

Post#1325 » by midranger » Thu Aug 3, 2023 10:51 am

ReasonablySober wrote:
MikeIsGood wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:
Again, I ask you: why did the Pac 12 die? It had LA and the Bay Area. The contracts expire in 2024 and sports media deals are exploding. You can't even blame Larry Scott.


They died because the largest schools were in debt, needed more money, knew they could join a conference with more than twice the size and annual cash flow, and jumped ship. Without those largest schools, the rest of the conference equates to a mid major.

Pac 12 didn’t have New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, DC metros, Chicago, and all of our other footprints. We offer like $40M more annually to USC and UCLA. And it was mutually beneficial to gain the LA market.

The end.


Rutgers and Maryland are doing a lot of work here and no one watches their games.

Correct.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 40,068
And1: 11,751
Joined: May 12, 2002

Re: 2022 College Football Discussion 

Post#1326 » by midranger » Thu Aug 3, 2023 10:55 am

Part of the issue for the PAC 12 was also that they had diluted their big markets with multiple schools, and the rest of the west has essentially zero people. 2 LA schools, 2 SF schools, 2 Washington/Arizona/Oregon schools.

They had a small pie, split too many ways.

This same thing will happen to the sec if they don’t expand their geographic footprint and end up taking Clemson, FSU, Louisville, Baylor, TCU, TT, Ok St or something. Much better football schools than many alternatives, but it would kill that conference.

Image
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
User avatar
MikeIsGood
RealGM
Posts: 36,193
And1: 12,112
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: Vamos Rafa
     

Re: 2022 College Football Discussion 

Post#1327 » by MikeIsGood » Thu Aug 3, 2023 11:49 am

ReasonablySober wrote:
MikeIsGood wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:
Again, I ask you: why did the Pac 12 die? It had LA and the Bay Area. The contracts expire in 2024 and sports media deals are exploding. You can't even blame Larry Scott.


They died because the largest schools were in debt, needed more money, knew they could join a conference with more than twice the size and annual cash flow, and jumped ship. Without those largest schools, the rest of the conference equates to a mid major.

Pac 12 didn’t have New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, DC metros, Chicago, and all of our other footprints. We offer like $40M more annually to USC and UCLA. And it was mutually beneficial to gain the LA market.

The end.


Rutgers and Maryland are doing a lot of work here and no one watches their games.


And Penn State. But yep. It’s too bad no one watches their games because all those people are paying to watch them anyways. midranger’s map and how densely populated the New England states are populated is like the TLDR of the past three pages of the thread.

One of the interesting aspects of the Apple TV+ proposal is that it flips everything I’ve said on its head. Those households don’t have to pay for it - Apple DOES need to get subscription and viewership numbers. It would have been interesting to see how it worked out, but I think it’s ultimately not going to matter because the conference is going to fall apart first.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 40,068
And1: 11,751
Joined: May 12, 2002

Re: 2022 College Football Discussion 

Post#1328 » by midranger » Thu Aug 3, 2023 11:58 am

MikeIsGood wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:
MikeIsGood wrote:
They died because the largest schools were in debt, needed more money, knew they could join a conference with more than twice the size and annual cash flow, and jumped ship. Without those largest schools, the rest of the conference equates to a mid major.

Pac 12 didn’t have New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, DC metros, Chicago, and all of our other footprints. We offer like $40M more annually to USC and UCLA. And it was mutually beneficial to gain the LA market.

The end.


Rutgers and Maryland are doing a lot of work here and no one watches their games.


And Penn State. But yep. It’s too bad no one watches their games because all those people are paying to watch them anyways. midranger’s map and how densely populated the New England states are populated is like the TLDR of the past three pages of the thread.

One of the interesting aspects of the Apple TV+ proposal is that it flips everything I’ve said on its head. Those households don’t have to pay for it - Apple DOES need to get subscription and viewership numbers. It would have been interesting to see how it worked out, but I think it’s ultimately not going to matter because the conference is going to fall apart first.

Yeah. PAC12 is obviously dying. Everyone knows it’ll be Big10 and SEC. No corp wants to pay big bucks for PAC12 once they add Boise State, Air Force, and Montana or something. If ACC’s contract was up right now, today, they’d be getting similar offers.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,908
And1: 43,004
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: 2022 College Football Discussion 

Post#1329 » by ReasonablySober » Thu Aug 3, 2023 5:46 pm

Read on Twitter
ReginaldDwight
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,920
And1: 2,498
Joined: Feb 11, 2015
   

Re: 2022 College Football Discussion 

Post#1330 » by ReginaldDwight » Thu Aug 3, 2023 9:33 pm

It was always going to be Oregon and Washington after USC and UCLA joined up. Basketball season should be more fun in the Big10 now.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 40,068
And1: 11,751
Joined: May 12, 2002

Re: 2022 College Football Discussion 

Post#1331 » by midranger » Thu Aug 3, 2023 10:05 pm

ReginaldDwight wrote:It was always going to be Oregon and Washington after USC and UCLA joined up. Basketball season should be more fun in the Big10 now.

Oh….God….that Oregon floor.

Do not want.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,908
And1: 43,004
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: 2022 College Football Discussion 

Post#1332 » by ReasonablySober » Fri Aug 4, 2023 3:30 am

Read on Twitter


ASU next.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 40,068
And1: 11,751
Joined: May 12, 2002

Re: 2022 College Football Discussion 

Post#1333 » by midranger » Fri Aug 4, 2023 3:49 am

And so dies the PAC12.

The Big12 May cobble together enough 2nd tier teams to remain somewhat relevant, but outlook isn’t great.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,908
And1: 43,004
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: 2022 College Football Discussion 

Post#1334 » by ReasonablySober » Fri Aug 4, 2023 4:02 am

That escalated fast and also way too slow. This could have all happened last year when UCLA and USC jumped.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,908
And1: 43,004
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: 2022 College Football Discussion 

Post#1335 » by ReasonablySober » Fri Aug 4, 2023 4:05 am

Washington regents are meeting now, so I'd expect them to be joining the Big 10 by tomorrow afternoon.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 40,068
And1: 11,751
Joined: May 12, 2002

Re: 2022 College Football Discussion 

Post#1336 » by midranger » Fri Aug 4, 2023 10:53 am

Washington and Oregon seeking an additional $10 million per year in travel expenses to join Big Ten.

“Yeah, that’s going to be a no from me bro.”

Negotiating leverage gone.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,696
And1: 8,242
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: 2022 College Football Discussion 

Post#1337 » by Mags FTW » Fri Aug 4, 2023 12:32 pm

Universities with $1 billion+ endowments ask for more money.

Film at 11.
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,922
And1: 4,712
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: 2022 College Football Discussion 

Post#1338 » by MVP2110 » Fri Aug 4, 2023 1:45 pm

Read on Twitter
?t=XZk4Scxk1NHp3hjYe27nGw&s=19
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 40,068
And1: 11,751
Joined: May 12, 2002

Re: 2022 College Football Discussion 

Post#1339 » by midranger » Fri Aug 4, 2023 2:38 pm

Trying to leverage every last dollar out of their new conferences
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,922
And1: 4,712
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: 2022 College Football Discussion 

Post#1340 » by MVP2110 » Fri Aug 4, 2023 2:53 pm

There is no way these schools are going to sign that Apple TV deal right? That'd be suicide for them considering how much less $ they'd get then other P5 programs
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"

Return to Green Bay Packers