Packers News, Trade Ideas, Transactions - 2023 Off Season

M-C-G · Post #1621 » by **M-C-G** » Mon Dec 5, 2022 3:32 pm

Barnes and Campbell injuries probably pushed Quay into a bigger role than expected. But we drafted Wyatt because he should have been a ready starter day 1. I think Reed and Slaton being better than expected is a part of it but we really need to get him more reps so we can see what we have.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Giannisland34 · Post #1622 » by **Giannisland34** » Mon Dec 5, 2022 3:36 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:I never judge rookies in their first year, many/most take time to adjust to the NFL. But now that the season is winding down I'd like to know why Wyatt isn't seeing the field more. You can only get better by playing. He missed one game but in all the others here are his snap counts and percentage of snaps played:

12 - 19%
4 - 10%
7 - 11%
5 - 9%
7 - 13%
12 - 16%
10 - 17%
10 - 16%
14 - 17%
15 - 23%
20 - 25%
9 - 17%

It does look like his PT was ramping up until yesterday. He's had 125 snaps. T.J. Slaton has had 257. Clark has over 600. Maybe Wyatt loafs in practice, I don't know. I guess the easy thing is to blame Barry but he's played Quay plenty so he has no aversion to rookies.

The defensive line rotation stinks and Barry likes to play lots of nickel. Many times then with only 2 DL. Both Slayton and Heflin looked better than both Wyatt and Ford in the preseason but sit on the practice squad with No PT too. Clark at the beginning of the season was a different player than now. All those snaps are taking a toll on his play and Reed as well.

Post #1623 » by **MickeyDavis** » Mon Dec 5, 2022 10:00 pm

Read on Twitter

MoMM · Post #1624 » by **MoMM** » Mon Dec 5, 2022 10:55 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:

Read on Twitter

So another offseason full of speculation, etc... :roll:

MVP2110 · Post #1625 » by **MVP2110** » Mon Dec 5, 2022 11:06 pm

Read on Twitter

?t=oR9Oh9wHoB90QJo6-Ndz8Q&s=19

Read on Twitter

?t=E8KiDad33LWyefuvfSgvEA&s=19

These two quotes are really interesting

WeekapaugGroove · Post #1626 » by **WeekapaugGroove** » Tue Dec 6, 2022 12:02 am

MVP2110 wrote:

Read on Twitter
?t=oR9Oh9wHoB90QJo6-Ndz8Q&s=19

Read on Twitter
?t=E8KiDad33LWyefuvfSgvEA&s=19

These two quotes are really interesting

Are they though? What else is he going to say. '**** I have no idea' wouldn't have gone over too well. Plus even if he thought he sucked he'd want to gas him up so maybe he could salvage a little draft capital in a trade.

I found the answer about Rodgers more interesting because it wasn't a quick 'yes' when asked if they want him back.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app

MVP2110 · Post #1627 » by **MVP2110** » Tue Dec 6, 2022 1:17 am

WeekapaugGroove wrote:
MVP2110 wrote:

Read on Twitter
?t=oR9Oh9wHoB90QJo6-Ndz8Q&s=19

Read on Twitter
?t=E8KiDad33LWyefuvfSgvEA&s=19

These two quotes are really interesting
Are they though? What else is he going to say. '**** I have no idea' wouldn't have gone over too well. Plus even if he thought he sucked he'd want to gas him up so maybe he could salvage a little draft capital in a trade.

I found the answer about Rodgers more interesting because it wasn't a quick 'yes' when asked if they want him back.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app

Specifically the part about having seen enough to know whether they will pick up the option. He could easily have deferred and said something along the lines of "we'll cross that bridge in the offseason"

Post #1628 » by **ReasonablySober** » Tue Dec 6, 2022 1:26 am

He also said at one point he doesn't see Rodgers and Love both on the roster in 2024.

Matches Malone · Post #1629 » by **Matches Malone** » Tue Dec 6, 2022 1:54 am

9 snaps last week just isn't enough for a guy producing in those limited reps. Did Wyatt sleep with Barry's wife?

Read on Twitter

M-C-G · Post #1630 » by **M-C-G** » Wed Dec 7, 2022 4:13 am

Jaelon Darden was waived by TB. He’d be a good add and should give us a plus punt returner to go along with Nixon looking like a plus KR

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Post #1631 » by **MickeyDavis** » Wed Dec 7, 2022 8:39 pm

Moved from Badgers thread

dbrodz7 wrote:
MickeyDavis wrote:So there's a chance, slim one imo, that he ends up in GB

I know this is kind of the wrong thread, but the Packers really need to cut the sh*t and just hire a top notch defensive coordinator that's already been highly successful in the NFL. Someone like a Vic Fangio.

Ron Swanson · Post #1632 » by **Ron Swanson** » Wed Dec 7, 2022 9:17 pm

I mean, both Pettine (NYJ) and Capers (PIT, MIA, JAX) were "top-notch" defensive coordinators with a track record of great defenses before they were hired, so I'm not sure why that should be a big consideration.

th87 · Post #1633 » by **th87** » Wed Dec 7, 2022 10:00 pm

stillgotgame wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:It's wild that we've all collectively gotten to the point with Rodgers where he could be a 9/11 truther and it's a shrug story. Like, yea, that tracks.

The stories about him that are going to come out five years from now will be absolutely crazy.

"Do you believe in 9/11?" Wow.
We need a reporter to jump on him. It's going to take a lot to get us out of paying him $59M next year, but he's nutso angle might be our best approach. No way someone's taking that contract though. Not as it's structured.

I wonder if anyone can trace his nuttiness back to the 2010 @Detroit game.

dbrodz7 · Post #1634 » by **dbrodz7** » Wed Dec 7, 2022 10:35 pm

Ron Swanson wrote:I mean, both Pettine (NYJ) and Capers (PIT, MIA, JAX) were "top-notch" defensive coordinators with a track record of great defenses before they were hired, so I'm not sure why that should be a big consideration.

Capers helped win us a super bowl.

WeekapaugGroove · Post #1635 » by **WeekapaugGroove** » Wed Dec 7, 2022 11:13 pm

**** at this point maybe Pettine was better than we thought and made some guys seem better than they really are.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app

DrWood · Post #1636 » by **DrWood** » Fri Dec 9, 2022 8:41 am

With the Rams win tonight, If the Packers had lost against the Bears, there would only be 2 teams with a worse record in the league.
Dammit.

Giannisland34 · Post #1637 » by **Giannisland34** » Fri Dec 9, 2022 5:38 pm

This wishing the Packers lost or even hoping to lose to the BEARS makes me sick. Makes me question how much of fan you truly are and reminds me how spoiled of fan base we’ve become with Farve and Rodgers. Where was Tony Mandarich picked? 2nd overall. Oh and how many HOFers were picked after him? Interesting, very interesting.

Mags FTW · Post #1638 » by **Mags FTW** » Fri Dec 9, 2022 6:09 pm

I try not to play the IF game when it comes to draft picks. The more your team loses, that likely means you have more holes to fill. Ex: If Watson didn't blossom the last 4 weeks, we likely have 2 extra losses vs. Dallas and Chicago. While that's great for draft position, that also means we probably think we have another hole to fill at WR.

crkone · Post #1639 » by **crkone** » Fri Dec 9, 2022 6:24 pm

Questioning the fandom of people who spend massive amounts of time on an Internet sports forum is... interesting.

jute2003 · Post #1640 » by **jute2003** » Fri Dec 9, 2022 7:08 pm

crkone wrote:Questioning the fandom of people who spend massive amounts of time on an Internet sports forum is... interesting.

You all gotta think the same as me or you're inferior in every way. It is the way