WeekapaugGroove wrote:Lol at the notion the pack would spend
a premium pick on a ILB. They simply do not value the position and they aren't alone or nessesarily wrong. I think they are pretty comfortable with Barnes as the main guy.. who by the way graded out much higher than 1st round ILB Queen last season.
My personal take is it's a lot like RB where the truly special guys matter and you don't want to suck at the position but with most guys like RBs the line in front of them matters more. I do believe it's the least important position on a defense.
Sent from my SM-G986U using
RealGM mobile app
Your point about the Packers not valuing the ILB position is irrefutable.
As for whether the Pack is not alone in devaluing the position, surely one of the other 31 teams virtually ignores the position just like Green Bay.
As for whether GB is not "necessarily wrong" in devaluing the ILB position, it is interesting that when the Pack's "brainstrust" has watched other franchises win Super Bowls over the past 10 seasons, I am assuming they tune in, they have witnessed teams with defenses featuring inside linebackers selected in the 1st round (Ravens-Ray Lewis 2012) (Patriots -Dont'a Hightower 2014, 2016, and 2018) or 2nd round (Seahawks - Bobby Wagner 2013) (Eagles - Mychal Kendricks 2017) or
1st & 2nd rounds (Bucs - Devin White [1] & Lavonte David [2]), yet that has obviously not persuaded the braintrust that using a round 1 or 2 pick on an ILBer can lead to Super Bowl wins.
Interesting.
Hard to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the Pack's undeniable devaluing of the ILB position has hurt the team's defenses since 2011, but we do know that (i) it has not helped and (ii) at least 7 of the past 10 teams that have won Lombardis do NOT subscribe to the Pack's approach to the position.