ImageImage

ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 28,069
And1: 15,596
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: The Land of Giannis.
     

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#181 » by rilamann » Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:29 am

trwi7 wrote:Hope we don't have to read/hear about this crap all week.

With the game tied, 17-17, and 49 seconds left, Ryan calmly led the Falcons on a six-play drive to set up a game-winning field goal by Matt Bryant.


http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/tag/_ ... -take-2011

No mention of that drive going a whopping 20 yards. Woo, what a calm stud leading that drive!



They call him Matty ''Ice'' for a reason Twirl.


I mean a lot of QBs could drive a team 20 yards,but no one can do it quite like ''Matty Ice''.

:D
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
User avatar
chuckleslove
RealGM
Posts: 18,566
And1: 1,128
Joined: Nov 17, 2009
Location: In an RV down by the river
Contact:
     

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#182 » by chuckleslove » Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:20 am

rilamann wrote:
trwi7 wrote:Hope we don't have to read/hear about this crap all week.

With the game tied, 17-17, and 49 seconds left, Ryan calmly led the Falcons on a six-play drive to set up a game-winning field goal by Matt Bryant.


http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/tag/_ ... -take-2011

No mention of that drive going a whopping 20 yards. Woo, what a calm stud leading that drive!



They call him Matty ''Ice'' for a reason Twirl.


I mean a lot of QBs could drive a team 20 yards,but no one can do it quite like ''Matty Ice''.

:D



I wish we would hear more about how Matty Ice has never won a playoff game like we did about Rodgers last week. They were both 0-1 in the playoffs coming into this season and Rodgers played a hell of a lot better in his first playoff start than Ryan did.
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 28,069
And1: 15,596
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: The Land of Giannis.
     

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#183 » by rilamann » Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:30 am

chuckleslove wrote:

I wish we would hear more about how Matty Ice has never won a playoff game like we did about Rodgers last week. They were both 0-1 in the playoffs coming into this season and Rodgers played a hell of a lot better in his first playoff start than Ryan did.



I thought about that too,I actually didn't even realize Matty Ice has never won a playoff game until I heard them say he hasn't yesterday after our game.

It was kinda like ''oh yeah he hasn't,why doesn't he get the flak Rodgers got''.


It's probably the fact Rodgers is a better player and he plays for the Packers,Rodgers' standards are much higher I think.

Maybe it's ok not to win playoff games when you play for a team like the Falcons.

Because yeah,you never really hear about how Ice hasn't won a playoff game like we did with Rodgers.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,324
And1: 27,985
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#184 » by trwi7 » Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:33 am

Exactly. And they played the same team in the same stadium.

Packers scored 45 points, Falcons 24.

Rodgers threw 4 TDs, Ryan threw 2.

Rodgers threw 1 INT, Ryan threw 2.

Rodgers completed 66.7% of his passes, Ryan completed 65%.

Rodgers threw for 423 yards, Ryan threw for 199.

Rodgers had a 121.3 QB rating, Ryan had a 72.8 QB rating.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
chuckleslove
RealGM
Posts: 18,566
And1: 1,128
Joined: Nov 17, 2009
Location: In an RV down by the river
Contact:
     

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#185 » by chuckleslove » Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:34 am

That very well could be, a team like the Packers has much higher standards than the Falcons. For them getting to the playoffs is good enough, for the Packers you need to get there, have success and eventually win a championship if you want to be great.

That would explain the fan bases reactions but not the national media. I guess when it probably also hurts Rodgers that he was following in the footsteps of a legend(Favre) whereas Ryan was thrown into a rebuilding project.
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page
an_also
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,268
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 22, 2008

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#186 » by an_also » Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:50 am

trwi7 wrote:Exactly. And they played the same team in the same stadium.

Packers scored 45 points, Falcons 24.

Rodgers threw 4 TDs, Ryan threw 2.

Rodgers threw 1 INT, Ryan threw 2.

Rodgers completed 66.7% of his passes, Ryan completed 65%.

Rodgers threw for 423 yards, Ryan threw for 199.

Rodgers had a 121.3 QB rating, Ryan had a 72.8 QB rating.

I'm pretty sure Ryan had a home game no?
User avatar
chuckleslove
RealGM
Posts: 18,566
And1: 1,128
Joined: Nov 17, 2009
Location: In an RV down by the river
Contact:
     

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#187 » by chuckleslove » Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:51 am

No, they went into the playoffs as the 5th seed and went to Arizona which was a 9-7 NFC west winner and went on to the Super Bowl, going into that Arizona was being called "the worst playoff team ever" by some people. Of course Seattle has taken that title this year.
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,324
And1: 27,985
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#188 » by trwi7 » Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:52 am

an_also wrote:
trwi7 wrote:Exactly. And they played the same team in the same stadium.

Packers scored 45 points, Falcons 24.

Rodgers threw 4 TDs, Ryan threw 2.

Rodgers threw 1 INT, Ryan threw 2.

Rodgers completed 66.7% of his passes, Ryan completed 65%.

Rodgers threw for 423 yards, Ryan threw for 199.

Rodgers had a 121.3 QB rating, Ryan had a 72.8 QB rating.

I'm pretty sure Ryan had a home game no?


Nope. It was in Arizona.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=290103022

I remember everyone being outraged that a 9-7 team got to host a playoff game. :lol:
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 28,069
And1: 15,596
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: The Land of Giannis.
     

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#189 » by rilamann » Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:52 am

chuckleslove wrote:That very well could be, a team like the Packers has much higher standards than the Falcons. For them getting to the playoffs is good enough, for the Packers you need to get there, have success and eventually win a championship if you want to be great.

That would explain the fan bases reactions but not the national media. I guess when it probably also hurts Rodgers that he was following in the footsteps of a legend(Favre) whereas Ryan was thrown into a rebuilding project.



Yeah I agree, following Favre adds to that too for Rodgers,not fair to Rodgers but it is what it is.

Not that it even matters to Rodgers.

The way Rodgers has come in these last 3 years and played so well and was unshaken by the Favre drama and being the first QB after Favre is one of the most impressive things IMO in all of sports in the last 20 years.

Even before we drafted Rodgers, I remember I used to think how sorry I'd feel for whoever the first QB was that followed Favre.

And that was assuming Favre rode off into the sunset quietly,which obviously wasn't the case.

What Rodgers has done with what he has had to go through the last 3 years (ESP 2008) is beyond incredible and impressive.

The guy is unshakable,along with being one hell of a damn good QB.

If we see Rodgers on the podium holding up the Lombardi trophy in a couple weeks it might bring a tear to my eye.No one deserves it more than him.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
User avatar
PkrsBcksGphsMqt
RealGM
Posts: 18,827
And1: 1,417
Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Location: Madison
   

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#190 » by PkrsBcksGphsMqt » Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:53 am

chuckleslove wrote:That very well could be, a team like the Packers has much higher standards than the Falcons. For them getting to the playoffs is good enough, for the Packers you need to get there, have success and eventually win a championship if you want to be great.

That would explain the fan bases reactions but not the national media. I guess when it probably also hurts Rodgers that he was following in the footsteps of a legend(Favre) whereas Ryan was thrown into a rebuilding project.


I think it's because Ryan is in his third year (I think) and Rodgers is in his 6th year. It's unfair but that is a big reason. Plus wasn't Ryan's first performance as a rookie? That's a pretty impressive showing for a rookie.
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
User avatar
chuckleslove
RealGM
Posts: 18,566
And1: 1,128
Joined: Nov 17, 2009
Location: In an RV down by the river
Contact:
     

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#191 » by chuckleslove » Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:55 am

PkrsBcksGphsMqt wrote:
chuckleslove wrote:That very well could be, a team like the Packers has much higher standards than the Falcons. For them getting to the playoffs is good enough, for the Packers you need to get there, have success and eventually win a championship if you want to be great.

That would explain the fan bases reactions but not the national media. I guess when it probably also hurts Rodgers that he was following in the footsteps of a legend(Favre) whereas Ryan was thrown into a rebuilding project.


I think it's because Ryan is in his third year (I think) and Rodgers is in his 6th year. It's unfair but that is a big reason. Plus wasn't Ryan's first performance as a rookie? That's a pretty impressive showing for a rookie.


Yes it was impressive but Rodgers is also in his third year as a starter, they have both started/played for three years so its very comparable in that regards. If you are going to hold Rodgers accountable for the three years he didn't even play then he gets credit for being on a team that went to the NFC championship game.
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,324
And1: 27,985
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#192 » by trwi7 » Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:57 am

I understand that Rodgers got to sit back and watch his first few years, but it's not like Rodgers had a ton of NFL experience before his first playoff game.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
OBF-MKE
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,295
And1: 0
Joined: May 22, 2010

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#193 » by OBF-MKE » Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:01 am

What did Cowherd have to say today?
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 28,069
And1: 15,596
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: The Land of Giannis.
     

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#194 » by rilamann » Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:01 am

It goes back to my previous post,but Ryan didn't have near the pressure Rodgers did following Favre.


Most QBs would crack mentally if they had to deal with that pressure.

That's the one thing when I think about Favre that really pisses me off,how he tried to come back and caused all that drama when camp was about to start and Rodgers was the guy.Rodgers had enough pressure on him already and then Favre does that to him.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,545
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#195 » by El Duderino » Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:12 am

chuckleslove wrote:
PkrsBcksGphsMqt wrote:
chuckleslove wrote:That very well could be, a team like the Packers has much higher standards than the Falcons. For them getting to the playoffs is good enough, for the Packers you need to get there, have success and eventually win a championship if you want to be great.

That would explain the fan bases reactions but not the national media. I guess when it probably also hurts Rodgers that he was following in the footsteps of a legend(Favre) whereas Ryan was thrown into a rebuilding project.


I think it's because Ryan is in his third year (I think) and Rodgers is in his 6th year. It's unfair but that is a big reason. Plus wasn't Ryan's first performance as a rookie? That's a pretty impressive showing for a rookie.


Yes it was impressive but Rodgers is also in his third year as a starter, they have both started/played for three years so its very comparable in that regards. If you are going to hold Rodgers accountable for the three years he didn't even play then he gets credit for being on a team that went to the NFC championship game.


I think it's such a story with Rodgers mainly because there is so much media out there today and that media is constantly looking for some kind of topic or angle to talk about.

Look at all the non-stop talk about the Packers, McCarthy, and Rodgers record in games decided by 4 points or less. What makes 4 points the magic number? Was the game yesterday not a close game because it was decided by 5 points instead of 4 points? If we win or lose to Atlanta in a game decided by say 6 points where the losing team had the ball last in a failed chance to win, will that not be considered a close game since it doesn't fit into the subjective 4 point margin?

Mix in the whole having to take over for Favre factor when it comes to Rodgers, all these sports talk radio shows, blogs, and other various sports media avenues need things to talk about and if something isn't there, they'll create something.
User avatar
chuckleslove
RealGM
Posts: 18,566
And1: 1,128
Joined: Nov 17, 2009
Location: In an RV down by the river
Contact:
     

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#196 » by chuckleslove » Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:14 am

Yeah the 4 point or less margin is sort of ludicrous. That game yesterday is the very definition of a close game, it was decided on the second to last play, the last play was Rodgers in the victory formation.
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,324
And1: 27,985
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#197 » by trwi7 » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:23 am

Is this guy high?

So if you want to find somebody who needs to prove a lot, it’s Rodgers, who until he wins a Super Bowl will have to live in the shadow of Brett Favre(notes) in Green Bay. Sure, Rodgers has been terrific the past three seasons, but they still love them some No. 4 in Packerland.


http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=A ... ions010911
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
RiotPunch
RealGM
Posts: 27,933
And1: 18,289
Joined: Jul 05, 2009
Location: LA
     

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#198 » by RiotPunch » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:25 am

trwi7 wrote:Is this guy high?

So if you want to find somebody who needs to prove a lot, it’s Rodgers, who until he wins a Super Bowl will have to live in the shadow of Brett Favre(notes) in Green Bay. Sure, Rodgers has been terrific the past three seasons, but they still love them some No. 4 in Packerland.


http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=A ... ions010911


PCP, IMO.
#FreeChuckDiesel
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
User avatar
Wade-A-Holic
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,055
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 09, 2003

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#199 » by Wade-A-Holic » Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:20 am

OBF-MKE wrote:What did Cowherd have to say today?


Wondering the same thing. Skip Bayless said some similarly stupid, ignorant things about the Packers last week. Today, when the stupid "Did GB win or did Phi lose?" question was posed on 1st and 10, he was the only one to try and make an argument for Philly. His only citation: the two missed field goals. As if the game would have been played EXACTLY the same had those two field goals been made, and as if there weren't 3-4 other hypothetical plays that would have changed things drastically (mainly in the Packers favor). Anyone who watched that game with any objectivity saw that the Packers were the better team.

Also, I have to give it up to Sal Pal. His predictions last week on Homer were almost spot on: Lower scoring than most predicted, came down to final minute(s), and he ultimately trusted Rodgers not to make mistakes more than Vick. Spot on.
User avatar
PkrsBcksGphsMqt
RealGM
Posts: 18,827
And1: 1,417
Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Location: Madison
   

Re: ROUND 2: Dirty Birds Lead-Up 

Post#200 » by PkrsBcksGphsMqt » Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:25 am

Sal Pal picked the Eagles to win. I heard him make the prediction on Cowherd. He was also pretty salty when he was interviewed late night on ESPN radio last night.
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.

Return to Green Bay Packers