Here's the thing though. Even Kittles absolute best year he wouldn't have ranked as a top 5 WR this past season. For as much of a beast Kelce was this past season (and he was) if you put his production up against Elite WRs like Adams, Hill, Brown this past season he's comming in behind all of them.Dennis Reynolds wrote:RRyder823 wrote:Case n point Kittle has only passed 1000 yards receiving twice on his career (one of which was just barley and the other 1300+ yards).Dennis Reynolds wrote:
Well yeah, guys like Kelce and Kittle are exactly the ones I'm talking about. They are so good and there's so few of them out there, why aren't they getting paid the type of money these elite WRs always seem to get?
I think most would consider 1000 yards pretty much standard for a ok/good starting WR where as even for a guy like Kittle hes only passed it 2 of his 6 years (even discounting his rookie year 2 out 5). And only one where the production was on par with top with what would be a top end WR
The raw production just isn't there compared to WRs
Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app
Kittle had some injury issues and 49ers have so many studs on offense so it's not the best idea to look at his raw stats imo. Even then, he signed his contract right after he had those two 1000+ yard seasons back to back so I don't see your point, especially considering that some guys are more valuable than their production would suggest.
Just look at A.J. Brown and his production before getting that 4 year, 100 mil contract. I think it was pretty obvious he was capable of more in the right situation and he got paid accordingly so it's not like it's all about production.
Kittle actually had better stats in comparison before signing an extension as well fwiw so I don't get why elite TEs don't at least get comparable money unless I'm overrating their impact.
You asked why they weren't payed on par. I gave an answer. You just don't get the raw production out of the position when compared with WRs. We can talk about how they present "mismatchs" all day but so do wideouts so if it's not creating additional catches, yards etc etc on par with the other position why should they get paid more? If two players catch 6 passes for 60 yards and a TD is one really more impactfull if he's listed as a TE? Or are they both just solid WRs?
Like I said you can make an argument for the Kelces of the world to make that kind of money but that's also a one of one situation in the league currently
Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app