Matches Malone wrote:
One of my guys, wouldn't hate that at all.
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation
MVP2110 wrote:Yea Harmon would be a good pick
Frank Nova wrote:Hoping for 1 of Burden, Higgins or Bond as the new WR toy. I think all 3 have a chance to be difference makers for a team that won’t lean on them to be the guy right away. I know Bond kind of embarrassed himself saying he’d break Worthy’s 40 time and didn’t really come close but he still has game breaker speed and I really like his potential. Burden at 23 could be a reach but I also think he’s a game breaker WR in the right system. I think Higgins compares pretty well to Christian Watson so there’s probably redundancy there but Higgins seems much more sure handed and that could make a big difference. The WR market is garbage at this point so just take a top guy in the draft and keep it moving.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?


Profound23 wrote:I don't think either of our free agent signings will impact the draft.
Take BPA, even if it's corner or offensive line
VooDoo7 wrote:JEIS wrote:
Kidd would have curb stomped him.
Maybe if his name was Denise instead of Dennis.
Fotis St wrote:Wherever you are David, I love you man.
ReasonablySober wrote:Profound23 wrote:I don't think either of our free agent signings will impact the draft.
Take BPA, even if it's corner or offensive line
It better impact the draft. The whole reason you sign someone in FA for starter money is you don't want to rely on the draft.

ReasonablySober wrote:Last year was extremely annoying, but if they draft an OL in the first three rounds I will lose my mind. As of right now they've got six guys for five spots. Adding another when you've got screaming needs elsewhere would be asinine imo.

M-C-G wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:Last year was extremely annoying, but if they draft an OL in the first three rounds I will lose my mind. As of right now they've got six guys for five spots. Adding another when you've got screaming needs elsewhere would be asinine imo.
Don’t we have two tackles that will be FA?
ReasonablySober wrote:M-C-G wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:Last year was extremely annoying, but if they draft an OL in the first three rounds I will lose my mind. As of right now they've got six guys for five spots. Adding another when you've got screaming needs elsewhere would be asinine imo.
Don’t we have two tackles that will be FA?
Not this offseason.

