ImageImage

Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

User avatar
MoreTrife
Head Coach
Posts: 6,754
And1: 2,525
Joined: Jun 14, 2014
     

Re: Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#261 » by MoreTrife » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:17 am

Packers run defense has been an abomination for 9+ years. How does that happen??
User avatar
worthlessBucks
RealGM
Posts: 22,566
And1: 4,932
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Bucks Logo
   

Re: Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#262 » by worthlessBucks » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:18 am

A Taylor fumble would be nice right about now
Go Bucks!
PintSizedBox10
Head Coach
Posts: 7,209
And1: 3,669
Joined: Mar 31, 2019
   

Re: Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#263 » by PintSizedBox10 » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:19 am

good thing we drafted the giant RB in the 2nd to never actually use him in the short yardage situations
User avatar
ampd
RealGM
Posts: 21,668
And1: 5,080
Joined: Dec 06, 2010

Re: Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#264 » by ampd » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:19 am

Flag every play
User avatar
worthlessBucks
RealGM
Posts: 22,566
And1: 4,932
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Bucks Logo
   

Re: Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#265 » by worthlessBucks » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:19 am

Reverse truck sound this entire drive for the Colts
Go Bucks!
User avatar
ampd
RealGM
Posts: 21,668
And1: 5,080
Joined: Dec 06, 2010

Re: Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#266 » by ampd » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:20 am

PintSizedBox10 wrote:good thing we drafted the giant RB in the 2nd to never actually use him in the short yardage situations

Going qb, rb was so bad its comical, especially considering neither look like they're any good
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#267 » by skones » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:20 am

Jesus, they're going to pick this thing up on 4th down.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,927
And1: 27,501
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#268 » by trwi7 » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:20 am

Now it's 4th and manageable and they'll probably go for it and easily get it.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,581
And1: 55,900
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#269 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:21 am

Of course they get 16 on 3rd and 20
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
XtremeDunkz
General Manager
Posts: 8,508
And1: 7,058
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
       

Re: Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#270 » by XtremeDunkz » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:21 am

Lol they got enough to go for it. ****

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
10/27/16
Nemesis21 wrote:It is absolutely hilarious hearing people still say Embiid has superstar potential.The guy is one injury away from being Greg Oden.:lol: Except Oden manged to play over 100 games in the NBA, I don't think Embiid will play more.
User avatar
MoreTrife
Head Coach
Posts: 6,754
And1: 2,525
Joined: Jun 14, 2014
     

Re: Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#271 » by MoreTrife » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:21 am

16 yds, disgusting
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 19,687
And1: 4,299
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#272 » by BUCKnation » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:21 am

Yeah, pretty sure they are going for it
awd4cy
Analyst
Posts: 3,315
And1: 1,882
Joined: Nov 23, 2013
     

Re: Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#273 » by awd4cy » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:21 am

I knew not accepting 1st and 30 was a stupid idea.
User avatar
MikeIsGood
RealGM
Posts: 35,816
And1: 11,687
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: Vamos Rafa
     

Re: Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#274 » by MikeIsGood » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:21 am

Ayt wrote:Why?


I'm not sure if this questions me wanting to kick the FG, or the Packers going for it, but the reason I think it was a horrible decision because this is the #1 defense in football and we've been terrible in the second half. I don't care that it was 6 inches. Tie the game.

ETA: Kick the FG*.
User avatar
ampd
RealGM
Posts: 21,668
And1: 5,080
Joined: Dec 06, 2010

Re: Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#275 » by ampd » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:22 am

trwi7 wrote:Now it's 4th and manageable and they'll probably go for it and easily get it.

I'd happily lose 10 seconds to get 2nd and 40 instead of 4th and 3
awd4cy
Analyst
Posts: 3,315
And1: 1,882
Joined: Nov 23, 2013
     

Re: Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#276 » by awd4cy » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:24 am

**** us.
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 36,432
And1: 26,674
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#277 » by Matches Malone » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:24 am

What's Dan Quinn up to?
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 19,687
And1: 4,299
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#278 » by BUCKnation » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:24 am

So predictable
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,927
And1: 27,501
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#279 » by trwi7 » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:24 am

lmao. I actually thought they might try to draw us offsides and succeed because we're us.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
awd4cy
Analyst
Posts: 3,315
And1: 1,882
Joined: Nov 23, 2013
     

Re: Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#280 » by awd4cy » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:25 am

Better decline that hold LaFluer

Return to Green Bay Packers