ImageImage

Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Adams Traded to Raiders for 2022 1st and 2nd Rd Picks

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 8,996
And1: 5,038
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Getsy to Bears - Steno Promoted to OC 

Post#281 » by RRyder823 » Sun Jan 30, 2022 7:41 pm

FAH1223 wrote:
jakecronus8 wrote:Reports are Packers are optimistic that both Rodgers and Davante return.

Still don’t buy it. Money doesn’t make sense and they’ll be coming back to a significantly worse team.

They can move money around easily.
If by "move money around easily" you mean they can cut a bunch of players then yes. You are correct.

Otherwise it's just non sense

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app
Daver
Head Coach
Posts: 7,102
And1: 2,708
Joined: Feb 23, 2019
       

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Getsy to Bears - Steno Promoted to OC 

Post#282 » by Daver » Sun Jan 30, 2022 8:16 pm

When you see the offensive minds in this years 4 teams still playing and the motion the mis direction these teams run makes you think as good as MLF has been during the regular season.After 3 years he still has a long way to go to be as good as any of the the last 4 teams
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,288
And1: 7,382
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Getsy to Bears - Steno Promoted to OC 

Post#283 » by FAH1223 » Sun Jan 30, 2022 9:27 pm

RRyder823 wrote:
FAH1223 wrote:
jakecronus8 wrote:Reports are Packers are optimistic that both Rodgers and Davante return.

Still don’t buy it. Money doesn’t make sense and they’ll be coming back to a significantly worse team.

They can move money around easily.
If by "move money around easily" you mean they can cut a bunch of players then yes. You are correct.

Otherwise it's just non sense


Cutting players is one. Restructuring the big cap numbers is the other. Extending guys like Jaire is the other. And if 12 is back, it will need to be on an extension because he is NOT going to be on a $46M cap numbers.

This is probably the scenario that Rap Sheet reports that Rodgers and the front office went over with last week.

Read on Twitter


From another forum:


Given the futures deals we have recently signed and the ERFA options to be taken up, we are currently 57.024m over the 2022 salary cap(figures from OTC). To get under the cap there are several scenarios but I've tried to list the best and worst cases going forward:

Rodgers: Re-signs with the team for 3 years(+1 void year) on a deal worth between $75-$105M. His cap hit floor for 2022 is $26.543M and ceiling is $29.043M making the savings available as between $17.6M to $20.1M.

Bahktiari: Has between $6M and $12M of his roster bonus/salary restructured into a signing bonus. Cap floor is $13.768M and cap ceiling is $18.268M making the savings available as between $4.5M to $9M.

Clark:Has between $6M and $12M of his roster bonus/salary restructured into a signing bonus. Cap floor is $11.9M and cap ceiling is $16.4M making the savings available as between $4.5M to $9M.

Alexander: Signs a 4 year extension worth $76M. Cap floor is $5.694M and cap ceiling of $13.294M making the savings available as between $0 and $7.6M.

Cobb: Is either cut or agrees to restructure his contract to base pay plus $3.25M in bonuses (signing/roster). Cap floor is $2.783M and cap ceiling is $4.511M making the savings available as between $5.13M and $6.858M.

Lowry: Has between $2.4M and $3.9M of his salary restructured into a signing bonus. Cap floor is $5.147M and cap ceiling is $6.272M making the savings available as between $1.8M to $2.925M.

Turner: Has between $2.4M and $4.2M of his salary restructured into a signing bonus. Cap floor is $6.09M and cap ceiling is $7.44M making the savings available as between $1.8M to $3.15M.

Amos: Signs a 2 year extension worth between $22.5M and $28M. Cap floor is $7.582M and cap ceiling of $11.982M making the savings available as between $0 and $4.4M.

P Smith: Is either cut or agrees to a 2 year extension(with 1 void year) worth between $27.5M and $32M. Cap floor is $7.25M and cap ceiling is $12.25M making the savings available as between $7.5M and $12.5M.

Z Smith: Is either cut or agrees to a 2 year extension(with 1 void year) worth between $35M and $40M. Cap floor is $12.38M and cap ceiling is $19.13M making the savings available as between $8.531M and $15.281M.



Based on those numbers you can take the best case scenario for each and we save $90.835M which allows us to re-sign Adams (cap hit around the $10-$12M mark), Campbell (cap hit around the $4-$6M mark), Douglas (cap hit around the $3-$5M mark), Tonyan (cap hit around the $2-$4M mark), Lazard (cap hit around the $2-$4M mark). This however has a big impact on our cap for 2023 with outs on most contracts from 2024 onwards.

Alternatively you take the lowest case scenario and we are still $5.642M over the cap.

Ultimately what the Packers do will depend on 3 key things:

- The appetite for Rodgers to want to come back

- The details around the future cap rises due to the new TV money from 2023 onwards

- The wants of all the other players not named Aaron Rodgers.
Image
Daver
Head Coach
Posts: 7,102
And1: 2,708
Joined: Feb 23, 2019
       

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Getsy to Bears - Steno Promoted to OC 

Post#284 » by Daver » Mon Jan 31, 2022 12:06 am

If they cut P and Z smith does that change their savings in cap space
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 19,872
And1: 4,398
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Getsy to Bears - Steno Promoted to OC 

Post#285 » by BUCKnation » Mon Jan 31, 2022 12:09 am

If you guys have learned anything about the past few years in the NFL, money is made up and no situation can't be eased with some shady/unclear deals or restructuring.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,043
And1: 27,648
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Getsy to Bears - Steno Promoted to OC 

Post#286 » by trwi7 » Mon Jan 31, 2022 12:18 am

BUCKnation wrote:If you guys have learned anything about the past few years in the NFL, money is made up and no situation can't be eased with some shady/unclear deals or restructuring.


Weren't the Saints like $50 million over the cap going into Brees' final season and they basically kept all of their important players through extensions/restructures and the like?
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 19,872
And1: 4,398
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Getsy to Bears - Steno Promoted to OC 

Post#287 » by BUCKnation » Mon Jan 31, 2022 12:21 am

trwi7 wrote:
BUCKnation wrote:If you guys have learned anything about the past few years in the NFL, money is made up and no situation can't be eased with some shady/unclear deals or restructuring.


Weren't the Saints like $50 million over the cap going into Brees' final season and they basically kept all of their important players through extensions/restructures and the like?

Something like that. Basically you can kick the can down as far as you want, which for them will probably be now with no more Brees or Payton.
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Getsy to Bears - Steno Promoted to OC 

Post#288 » by WeekapaugGroove » Mon Jan 31, 2022 2:58 am

BUCKnation wrote:
trwi7 wrote:
BUCKnation wrote:If you guys have learned anything about the past few years in the NFL, money is made up and no situation can't be eased with some shady/unclear deals or restructuring.


Weren't the Saints like $50 million over the cap going into Brees' final season and they basically kept all of their important players through extensions/restructures and the like?

Something like that. Basically you can kick the can down as far as you want, which for them will probably be now with no more Brees or Payton.
Yeah the saints will be paying the piper this off-season and I don't think it was a coincidence that Payton left that mess to someone else.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 8,996
And1: 5,038
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Getsy to Bears - Steno Promoted to OC 

Post#289 » by RRyder823 » Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:00 am

FAH1223 wrote:
RRyder823 wrote:
FAH1223 wrote:They can move money around easily.
If by "move money around easily" you mean they can cut a bunch of players then yes. You are correct.

Otherwise it's just non sense


Cutting players is one. Restructuring the big cap numbers is the other. Extending guys like Jaire is the other. And if 12 is back, it will need to be on an extension because he is NOT going to be on a $46M cap numbers.

This is probably the scenario that Rap Sheet reports that Rodgers and the front office went over with last week.

Read on Twitter


From another forum:


Given the futures deals we have recently signed and the ERFA options to be taken up, we are currently 57.024m over the 2022 salary cap(figures from OTC). To get under the cap there are several scenarios but I've tried to list the best and worst cases going forward:

Rodgers: Re-signs with the team for 3 years(+1 void year) on a deal worth between $75-$105M. His cap hit floor for 2022 is $26.543M and ceiling is $29.043M making the savings available as between $17.6M to $20.1M.

Bahktiari: Has between $6M and $12M of his roster bonus/salary restructured into a signing bonus. Cap floor is $13.768M and cap ceiling is $18.268M making the savings available as between $4.5M to $9M.

Clark:Has between $6M and $12M of his roster bonus/salary restructured into a signing bonus. Cap floor is $11.9M and cap ceiling is $16.4M making the savings available as between $4.5M to $9M.

Alexander: Signs a 4 year extension worth $76M. Cap floor is $5.694M and cap ceiling of $13.294M making the savings available as between $0 and $7.6M.

Cobb: Is either cut or agrees to restructure his contract to base pay plus $3.25M in bonuses (signing/roster). Cap floor is $2.783M and cap ceiling is $4.511M making the savings available as between $5.13M and $6.858M.

Lowry: Has between $2.4M and $3.9M of his salary restructured into a signing bonus. Cap floor is $5.147M and cap ceiling is $6.272M making the savings available as between $1.8M to $2.925M.

Turner: Has between $2.4M and $4.2M of his salary restructured into a signing bonus. Cap floor is $6.09M and cap ceiling is $7.44M making the savings available as between $1.8M to $3.15M.

Amos: Signs a 2 year extension worth between $22.5M and $28M. Cap floor is $7.582M and cap ceiling of $11.982M making the savings available as between $0 and $4.4M.

P Smith: Is either cut or agrees to a 2 year extension(with 1 void year) worth between $27.5M and $32M. Cap floor is $7.25M and cap ceiling is $12.25M making the savings available as between $7.5M and $12.5M.

Z Smith: Is either cut or agrees to a 2 year extension(with 1 void year) worth between $35M and $40M. Cap floor is $12.38M and cap ceiling is $19.13M making the savings available as between $8.531M and $15.281M.



Based on those numbers you can take the best case scenario for each and we save $90.835M which allows us to re-sign Adams (cap hit around the $10-$12M mark), Campbell (cap hit around the $4-$6M mark), Douglas (cap hit around the $3-$5M mark), Tonyan (cap hit around the $2-$4M mark), Lazard (cap hit around the $2-$4M mark). This however has a big impact on our cap for 2023 with outs on most contracts from 2024 onwards.

Alternatively you take the lowest case scenario and we are still $5.642M over the cap.

Ultimately what the Packers do will depend on 3 key things:

- The appetite for Rodgers to want to come back

- The details around the future cap rises due to the new TV money from 2023 onwards

- The wants of all the other players not named Aaron Rodgers.


Even with all those restructures and maximum cap savings it takes the absolute lowest possible projections for new contracts to be handed out while also factoring in a extension for Jaire and 3 other players to make it work. (that last part alone discounts using "easilly" as a description for them to open the room)

That's alot of can kicking and guys looking to get paid taking team friendly deals to make work. Nothin easy about it

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
th87
RealGM
Posts: 11,657
And1: 13,779
Joined: Dec 04, 2005

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Getsy to Bears - Steno Promoted to OC 

Post#290 » by th87 » Mon Jan 31, 2022 7:05 am

RRyder823 wrote:
FAH1223 wrote:
RRyder823 wrote:If by "move money around easily" you mean they can cut a bunch of players then yes. You are correct.

Otherwise it's just non sense


Cutting players is one. Restructuring the big cap numbers is the other. Extending guys like Jaire is the other. And if 12 is back, it will need to be on an extension because he is NOT going to be on a $46M cap numbers.

This is probably the scenario that Rap Sheet reports that Rodgers and the front office went over with last week.

Read on Twitter


From another forum:


Given the futures deals we have recently signed and the ERFA options to be taken up, we are currently 57.024m over the 2022 salary cap(figures from OTC). To get under the cap there are several scenarios but I've tried to list the best and worst cases going forward:

Rodgers: Re-signs with the team for 3 years(+1 void year) on a deal worth between $75-$105M. His cap hit floor for 2022 is $26.543M and ceiling is $29.043M making the savings available as between $17.6M to $20.1M.

Bahktiari: Has between $6M and $12M of his roster bonus/salary restructured into a signing bonus. Cap floor is $13.768M and cap ceiling is $18.268M making the savings available as between $4.5M to $9M.

Clark:Has between $6M and $12M of his roster bonus/salary restructured into a signing bonus. Cap floor is $11.9M and cap ceiling is $16.4M making the savings available as between $4.5M to $9M.

Alexander: Signs a 4 year extension worth $76M. Cap floor is $5.694M and cap ceiling of $13.294M making the savings available as between $0 and $7.6M.

Cobb: Is either cut or agrees to restructure his contract to base pay plus $3.25M in bonuses (signing/roster). Cap floor is $2.783M and cap ceiling is $4.511M making the savings available as between $5.13M and $6.858M.

Lowry: Has between $2.4M and $3.9M of his salary restructured into a signing bonus. Cap floor is $5.147M and cap ceiling is $6.272M making the savings available as between $1.8M to $2.925M.

Turner: Has between $2.4M and $4.2M of his salary restructured into a signing bonus. Cap floor is $6.09M and cap ceiling is $7.44M making the savings available as between $1.8M to $3.15M.

Amos: Signs a 2 year extension worth between $22.5M and $28M. Cap floor is $7.582M and cap ceiling of $11.982M making the savings available as between $0 and $4.4M.

P Smith: Is either cut or agrees to a 2 year extension(with 1 void year) worth between $27.5M and $32M. Cap floor is $7.25M and cap ceiling is $12.25M making the savings available as between $7.5M and $12.5M.

Z Smith: Is either cut or agrees to a 2 year extension(with 1 void year) worth between $35M and $40M. Cap floor is $12.38M and cap ceiling is $19.13M making the savings available as between $8.531M and $15.281M.



Based on those numbers you can take the best case scenario for each and we save $90.835M which allows us to re-sign Adams (cap hit around the $10-$12M mark), Campbell (cap hit around the $4-$6M mark), Douglas (cap hit around the $3-$5M mark), Tonyan (cap hit around the $2-$4M mark), Lazard (cap hit around the $2-$4M mark). This however has a big impact on our cap for 2023 with outs on most contracts from 2024 onwards.

Alternatively you take the lowest case scenario and we are still $5.642M over the cap.

Ultimately what the Packers do will depend on 3 key things:

- The appetite for Rodgers to want to come back

- The details around the future cap rises due to the new TV money from 2023 onwards

- The wants of all the other players not named Aaron Rodgers.


Even with all those restructures and maximum cap savings it takes the absolute lowest possible projections for new contracts to be handed out while also factoring in a extension for Jaire to make it work. (that last part alone discounts using "easilly" as a description for them to open the room)

That's alot of can kicking and guys looking to get paid taking team friendly deals to make work. Nothin easy about it

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app


Not sure where to put this, but replying here to generate discussion. But my hot take is that I think being a good GM is a total crapshoot.

Every NFL team has access to all the film and all the information. Most teams rate prospects at roughly the same tier, and there's likely very little variance between one team's board and another.

And so being considered a great GM is simply a function of retroactively determining if your draft picks worked. If they produced a star, you were largely lucky, and now you're considered a great GM, and if they didn't, you're probably fired. The GM who has the most favorable dice-rolls ends up a legend.

Ted Thompson's first pick (Rodgers) ended up being a grand slam, and so he was considered a wizard for a full decade plus, despite his other picks hitting at an average rate, including some hits (which all GMs can boast), and some misses (which all GMs can lament).

Ryan Pace had Mahomes and Trubisky neck and neck, and thankfully chose Trubisky. And now he's unemployed. But if he took the other path, he'd be considered a genius. Just a bad roll of the dice. No way to really know that Mahomes would grow and Trubisky wouldn't.

This is why former "greats" like Colbert, Jerry Reese, Polian, etc. are eventually shown the door. They didn't lose their touch - it's just that their misses outweighed their hits over time (or their hits weren't as impactful anymore), which I don't think is anything more than an unlucky slump for a period of time.

That also explains why Jerry Jones' entitled kids ended up building a pretty strong roster. They had the picks and had a pretty good run of picking impact players. Any of us could've done the same with good luck, just as any of us could've bombed.

So in terms of the Packers, Gute is no exception. He's had hits in the first round (Jaire, Gary), but some misses (Savage over Deebo Samuel). He's gotten little to nothing out of his receiver picks. So the team's success is simply a function of his good fortune in the first round, stars who were already in place, subtracted by the misses caused by his bad fortune.

Thoughts?
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 8,996
And1: 5,038
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Getsy to Bears - Steno Promoted to OC 

Post#291 » by RRyder823 » Mon Jan 31, 2022 9:13 am

th87 wrote:
RRyder823 wrote:
FAH1223 wrote:
Cutting players is one. Restructuring the big cap numbers is the other. Extending guys like Jaire is the other. And if 12 is back, it will need to be on an extension because he is NOT going to be on a $46M cap numbers.

This is probably the scenario that Rap Sheet reports that Rodgers and the front office went over with last week.

Read on Twitter


From another forum:



Even with all those restructures and maximum cap savings it takes the absolute lowest possible projections for new contracts to be handed out while also factoring in a extension for Jaire to make it work. (that last part alone discounts using "easilly" as a description for them to open the room)

That's alot of can kicking and guys looking to get paid taking team friendly deals to make work. Nothin easy about it

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app


Not sure where to put this, but replying here to generate discussion. But my hot take is that I think being a good GM is a total crapshoot.

Every NFL team has access to all the film and all the information. Most teams rate prospects at roughly the same tier, and there's likely very little variance between one team's board and another.

And so being considered a great GM is simply a function of retroactively determining if your draft picks worked. If they produced a star, you were largely lucky, and now you're considered a great GM, and if they didn't, you're probably fired. The GM who has the most favorable dice-rolls ends up a legend.

Ted Thompson's first pick (Rodgers) ended up being a grand slam, and so he was considered a wizard for a full decade plus, despite his other picks hitting at an average rate, including some hits (which all GMs can boast), and some misses (which all GMs can lament).

Ryan Pace had Mahomes and Trubisky neck and neck, and thankfully chose Trubisky. And now he's unemployed. But if he took the other path, he'd be considered a genius. Just a bad roll of the dice. No way to really know that Mahomes would grow and Trubisky wouldn't.

This is why former "greats" like Colbert, Jerry Reese, Polian, etc. are eventually shown the door. They didn't lose their touch - it's just that their misses outweighed their hits over time (or their hits weren't as impactful anymore), which I don't think is anything more than an unlucky slump for a period of time.

That also explains why Jerry Jones' entitled kids ended up building a pretty strong roster. They had the picks and had a pretty good run of picking impact players. Any of us could've done the same with good luck, just as any of us could've bombed.

So in terms of the Packers, Gute is no exception. He's had hits in the first round (Jaire, Gary), but some misses (Savage over Deebo Samuel). He's gotten little to nothing out of his receiver picks. So the team's success is simply a function of his good fortune in the first round, stars who were already in place, subtracted by the misses caused by his bad fortune.

Thoughts?
I think you can make the argument that high in the draft luck is the majority factor as like you said most draft boards end up being pretty even.

Once you get to the middle and late rounds boards start having high variance and that's where the good gms start to separate. (luck still plays a factor though)

Taking that into account I'll agree that luck plays a significant role in whether a gm is a good drafter. It's why trading down is almost the right option come draft time as the "more swings at the plate" is an extremely strong draft strategy imo

However that doesn't mean GMs are mostly a product of luck as that's only one aspect. There's which players to retain, which to let go, how much to pay and which players to bring in while then also bringing in guys mid-season and which players to cut off the final roster. Also it should be noted that the GM hires the coach and I wouldn't call it lucky to hire the right one.



Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Getsy to Bears - Steno Promoted to OC 

Post#292 » by WeekapaugGroove » Mon Jan 31, 2022 1:50 pm

th87 wrote:
RRyder823 wrote:
FAH1223 wrote:
Cutting players is one. Restructuring the big cap numbers is the other. Extending guys like Jaire is the other. And if 12 is back, it will need to be on an extension because he is NOT going to be on a $46M cap numbers.

This is probably the scenario that Rap Sheet reports that Rodgers and the front office went over with last week.

Read on Twitter


From another forum:



Even with all those restructures and maximum cap savings it takes the absolute lowest possible projections for new contracts to be handed out while also factoring in a extension for Jaire to make it work. (that last part alone discounts using "easilly" as a description for them to open the room)

That's alot of can kicking and guys looking to get paid taking team friendly deals to make work. Nothin easy about it

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app


Not sure where to put this, but replying here to generate discussion. But my hot take is that I think being a good GM is a total crapshoot.

Every NFL team has access to all the film and all the information. Most teams rate prospects at roughly the same tier, and there's likely very little variance between one team's board and another.

And so being considered a great GM is simply a function of retroactively determining if your draft picks worked. If they produced a star, you were largely lucky, and now you're considered a great GM, and if they didn't, you're probably fired. The GM who has the most favorable dice-rolls ends up a legend.

Ted Thompson's first pick (Rodgers) ended up being a grand slam, and so he was considered a wizard for a full decade plus, despite his other picks hitting at an average rate, including some hits (which all GMs can boast), and some misses (which all GMs can lament).

Ryan Pace had Mahomes and Trubisky neck and neck, and thankfully chose Trubisky. And now he's unemployed. But if he took the other path, he'd be considered a genius. Just a bad roll of the dice. No way to really know that Mahomes would grow and Trubisky wouldn't.

This is why former "greats" like Colbert, Jerry Reese, Polian, etc. are eventually shown the door. They didn't lose their touch - it's just that their misses outweighed their hits over time (or their hits weren't as impactful anymore), which I don't think is anything more than an unlucky slump for a period of time.

That also explains why Jerry Jones' entitled kids ended up building a pretty strong roster. They had the picks and had a pretty good run of picking impact players. Any of us could've done the same with good luck, just as any of us could've bombed.

So in terms of the Packers, Gute is no exception. He's had hits in the first round (Jaire, Gary), but some misses (Savage over Deebo Samuel). He's gotten little to nothing out of his receiver picks. So the team's success is simply a function of his good fortune in the first round, stars who were already in place, subtracted by the misses caused by his bad fortune.

Thoughts?
I don't exactly agree a GM is mostly luck but I do think luck plays a bigger role in sports than we tend to want to believe. Damn near every champion has some lucky break in their run.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,849
And1: 29,731
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Getsy to Bears - Steno Promoted to OC 

Post#293 » by Ron Swanson » Mon Jan 31, 2022 2:01 pm

Image
stillgotgame
Analyst
Posts: 3,521
And1: 2,304
Joined: May 27, 2005
     

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Getsy to Bears - Steno Promoted to OC 

Post#294 » by stillgotgame » Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:00 pm

Gute’s “luck” is going to be defined by Jordan Love. Trade up for QB and you’re all in.
Not surprisingly of course he wants Rodgers to stay. No way he survives a rebuild at this point. Fair weather fans and media will all say he sucks, it was only Rodgers who made us good.
Bucks in 6
zmanishere11
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,884
And1: 279
Joined: May 20, 2002
Location: WI

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Getsy to Bears - Steno Promoted to OC 

Post#295 » by zmanishere11 » Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:17 pm

The cap situation is 100% workable to keep Rodgers and Davante if they are reasonable with their demands.

The key thing is we have to make great decisions around who we pay / keep.

Last year for me Zadarius was the guy we had to cut / trade. His replacement was already on the roster and had we moved on last year his cap number for this year would be zero. The problem with getting creative and keeping him now is it just makes next years problem worse - we have to move on from Z his money is spoken for (Jenkins, Gary, Jaire).

I still think trading Jaire is the right thing to do this off-season. I don't love it I'm just a realist - we can probably get a high 1 (or more) in a trade for him and that money freed up from not paying him can go towards a number of other places. In simple terms, would you rather of Jaire or Adams and a high 1st round pick?
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Getsy to Bears - Steno Promoted to OC 

Post#296 » by WeekapaugGroove » Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:24 pm

stillgotgame wrote:Gute’s “luck” is going to be defined by Jordan Love. Trade up for QB and you’re all in.
Not surprisingly of course he wants Rodgers to stay. No way he survives a rebuild at this point. Fair weather fans and media will all say he sucks, it was only Rodgers who made us good.
The funny part is if he simply waits for Rodgers to be done he would have got like two free seasons as he looked for a new QB. If love gets him fired it's a total self own. From a job security standpoint drafting Love was a huge gamble.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
stillgotgame
Analyst
Posts: 3,521
And1: 2,304
Joined: May 27, 2005
     

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Getsy to Bears - Steno Promoted to OC 

Post#297 » by stillgotgame » Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:38 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:
stillgotgame wrote:Gute’s “luck” is going to be defined by Jordan Love. Trade up for QB and you’re all in.
Not surprisingly of course he wants Rodgers to stay. No way he survives a rebuild at this point. Fair weather fans and media will all say he sucks, it was only Rodgers who made us good.
The funny part is if he simply waits for Rodgers to be done he would have got like two free seasons as he looked for a new QB. If love gets him fired it's a total self own. From a job security standpoint drafting Love was a huge gamble.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app


As big a gamble as he could make - moving up to take a guy who ran a high school level spread offense and still led the NCAA in interceptions.
Jordan may still make it but he was always going to be a high risk project.
Bucks in 6
Treebeard
General Manager
Posts: 7,859
And1: 1,957
Joined: Jun 17, 2009
Location: Out in the Driftless Area
     

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Getsy to Bears - Steno Promoted to OC 

Post#298 » by Treebeard » Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:53 pm

Jenkins is a Gute pick too. That was an A+ pick
*******************************************************
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Getsy to Bears - Steno Promoted to OC 

Post#299 » by WeekapaugGroove » Mon Jan 31, 2022 5:05 pm

Treebeard wrote:Jenkins is a Gute pick too. That was an A+ pick
Yeah I'd say if you ranked all the GMs draft picks since Gute took over hed be in the top 25%. He's generally drafted well.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
zmanishere11
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,884
And1: 279
Joined: May 20, 2002
Location: WI

Re: Packers 2022 Offseason Thread - Getsy to Bears - Steno Promoted to OC 

Post#300 » by zmanishere11 » Mon Jan 31, 2022 6:16 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:
Treebeard wrote:Jenkins is a Gute pick too. That was an A+ pick
Yeah I'd say if you ranked all the GMs draft picks since Gute took over hed be in the top 25%. He's generally drafted well.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app


Gutes got a bunch of home runs in the draft and a bunch of strike outs. We need some singles.

Return to Green Bay Packers