sdn40 wrote:Gute said he's fine. TT once told him "they might kill you but they won't eat you"
Hahaha loved TT when he was all there. Cool customer.
Love Lafleur too.
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation
sdn40 wrote:Gute said he's fine. TT once told him "they might kill you but they won't eat you"

MoreTrife wrote:sdn40 wrote:Gute said he's fine. TT once told him "they might kill you but they won't eat you"
Hahaha loved TT when he was all there. Cool customer.
Love Lafleur too.
humanrefutation wrote:HaroldinGMinor wrote:humanrefutation wrote:
Packer fans won't turn on him unless he forces his way out of GB. And then at that point, you'll have a big segment of Packer fans that'll blame the Packers organization and will root against Jordan Love - that is, unless he becomes a HOFer.
This sounds familiar...
We know this from experience. Most Packer fans haven't evolved much over the last 15 years.
Sure, there are people who are turning on Aaron. A lot of the same arguments that came out against Favre's awful approach to the 2008 offseason apply to Rodgers as well. There's some selfishness. There's some ego. I was against Favre back then because I thought he approached that whole thing in a terrible way and really put the organization in a terrible position. Also, I was kinda ready to move on to Rodgers - that Dallas game had me intrigued.
I'm less annoyed with Rodgers right now, but he hasn't been Favre-caliber vindictive, yet.
But man, we had a hell of a ton of Favre fans who just trashed the Packers. Many of them crawled back when they won a Super Bowl with Aaron. But it was a pain for at least a couple seasons.
And right now, the Packers fans on my timelines are about 75-25 pro Rodgers.
Fair enoughhumanrefutation wrote:RRyder823 wrote:humanrefutation wrote:
We know this from experience. Most Packer fans haven't evolved much over the last 15 years.
Sure, there are people who are turning on Aaron. A lot of the same arguments that came out against Favre's awful approach to the 2008 offseason apply to Rodgers as well. There's some selfishness. There's some ego. I was against Favre back then because I thought he approached that whole thing in a terrible way and really put the organization in a terrible position. Also, I was kinda ready to move on to Rodgers - that Dallas game had me intrigued.
I'm less annoyed with Rodgers right now, but he hasn't been Favre-caliber vindictive, yet.
But man, we had a hell of a ton of Favre fans who just trashed the Packers. Many of them crawled back when they won a Super Bowl with Aaron. But it was a pain for at least a couple seasons.
And right now, the Packers fans on my timelines are about 75-25 pro Rodgers.
And on my time line it's about 95-5 anti Rodgers (and honestly i only say "5" cause I'd assume there were a few posts I didn't see)
I get what your saying though and don't particularly disagree. But the bolded is in way more dispute then i believe your giving credit. It's not a great leap to say what Rodgers pulled is worse (at least in regards to his time with GB)
Yes I know you disagree with that but it isnt far fetched
Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app
I don't know if I'd say far-fetched. That's not quite the term I'd use, because it's not something I'm speculating about.
I'd say that the facts of what Aaron has done so far don't rise to the level of what Favre did back in 2008. You don't agree with that. That's fine with me. It's a subjective analysis, ultimately. And I may feel differently if this is still going on in August.
ReasonablySober wrote:Also, the still in his prime MVP of the league demanding a trade is so much worse than anything Favre did it makes me wonder if some of you are on drugs.

DavidDunn21 wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:Also, the still in his prime MVP of the league demanding a trade is so much worse than anything Favre did it makes me wonder if some of you are on drugs.
Wow I agreed with you on this AND Falcon/Winter Soldier. What is going on
DavidDunn21 wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:Also, the still in his prime MVP of the league demanding a trade is so much worse than anything Favre did it makes me wonder if some of you are on drugs.
Wow I agreed with you on this AND Falcon/Winter Soldier. What is going on


DavidDunn21 wrote:I was Team Favre and always will be, but I'm wondering if any of you felt any lingering resentment to Brett BEFORE the whole 2008 saga. The reason I ask this is I moved out of state around that time and never really had a good read on what the fans actually thought.
My personal experience as a Favre Stan was basically: Brett Favre is awesome and the star I never thought the Bucks, Brewers or Packers would ever have. He made the Packers cool after years and years of The Bears and Raiders and Cowboys dominating the media/fashion/hip-hop landscape. 2007 was an incredibly fun return to form ride. My (possibly flawed) recollection was the national media got tired of having to cover him every summer and at a certain point turned on him. I didn't personally know any Packer fans who weren't rooting for him to come back and unretire. And I know a lot of people. Not that those people didn't exist, but what I've always felt is this:
Ari Fleischer spun the thing in a brilliant way, and all of a sudden "diva" and "hold the team hostage" was a part of the dialogue. Did anyone think Brett Favre was a diva in 2004? Was that a thing I just missed? Were there Wisconsinites saying that the Gunslinger was "holding the team hostage in '06? Or did a Bush spin doctor incept everyone into remembering it that way now? I know there was anger AFTER the Vikings year, but what percentage of Packers die-hards were sick of him before that?
Anyway, what Rodgers is doing is not remotely the same thing, in my opinion. Rodgers at least has the benefit of seeing how the last situation worked out. He's got a better offense, they brought back Jones, he doesn't want to retire and he's simply trying to pull a Harden because he's always been a _______. I'm not sure how you lose to Tom Brady at home and somehow spin it as being everyone else's fault. If I were the Packers, I'd wait him out so he had to explain himself publicly. There's no version of an explanation that makes him look good. At least Brett had a messy breakup that started with him trying to come back to play for the GREEN BAY PACKERS.
Ok, but specifically my question is what percentage of fans felt strong animus beforehand. I guess we'll never know unless Kellyanne Conway gets hired to call Rodgers a pussyReasonablySober wrote:DavidDunn21 wrote:I was Team Favre and always will be, but I'm wondering if any of you felt any lingering resentment to Brett BEFORE the whole 2008 saga. The reason I ask this is I moved out of state around that time and never really had a good read on what the fans actually thought.
My personal experience as a Favre Stan was basically: Brett Favre is awesome and the star I never thought the Bucks, Brewers or Packers would ever have. He made the Packers cool after years and years of The Bears and Raiders and Cowboys dominating the media/fashion/hip-hop landscape. 2007 was an incredibly fun return to form ride. My (possibly flawed) recollection was the national media got tired of having to cover him every summer and at a certain point turned on him. I didn't personally know any Packer fans who weren't rooting for him to come back and unretire. And I know a lot of people. Not that those people didn't exist, but what I've always felt is this:
Ari Fleischer spun the thing in a brilliant way, and all of a sudden "diva" and "hold the team hostage" was a part of the dialogue. Did anyone think Brett Favre was a diva in 2004? Was that a thing I just missed? Were there Wisconsinites saying that the Gunslinger was "holding the team hostage in '06? Or did a Bush spin doctor incept everyone into remembering it that way now? I know there was anger AFTER the Vikings year, but what percentage of Packers die-hards were sick of him before that?
Anyway, what Rodgers is doing is not remotely the same thing, in my opinion. Rodgers at least has the benefit of seeing how the last situation worked out. He's got a better offense, they brought back Jones, he doesn't want to retire and he's simply trying to pull a Harden because he's always been a _______. I'm not sure how you lose to Tom Brady at home and somehow spin it as being everyone else's fault. If I were the Packers, I'd wait him out so he had to explain himself publicly. There's no version of an explanation that makes him look good. At least Brett had a messy breakup that started with him trying to come back to play for the GREEN BAY PACKERS.
Oh, **** Favre and what he did too.
There, the universe is restored.

DavidDunn21 wrote:Ok, but specifically my question is what percentage of fans felt strong animus beforehand. I guess we'll never know unless Kellyanne Conway gets hired to call Rodgers a pussyReasonablySober wrote:DavidDunn21 wrote:I was Team Favre and always will be, but I'm wondering if any of you felt any lingering resentment to Brett BEFORE the whole 2008 saga. The reason I ask this is I moved out of state around that time and never really had a good read on what the fans actually thought.
My personal experience as a Favre Stan was basically: Brett Favre is awesome and the star I never thought the Bucks, Brewers or Packers would ever have. He made the Packers cool after years and years of The Bears and Raiders and Cowboys dominating the media/fashion/hip-hop landscape. 2007 was an incredibly fun return to form ride. My (possibly flawed) recollection was the national media got tired of having to cover him every summer and at a certain point turned on him. I didn't personally know any Packer fans who weren't rooting for him to come back and unretire. And I know a lot of people. Not that those people didn't exist, but what I've always felt is this:
Ari Fleischer spun the thing in a brilliant way, and all of a sudden "diva" and "hold the team hostage" was a part of the dialogue. Did anyone think Brett Favre was a diva in 2004? Was that a thing I just missed? Were there Wisconsinites saying that the Gunslinger was "holding the team hostage in '06? Or did a Bush spin doctor incept everyone into remembering it that way now? I know there was anger AFTER the Vikings year, but what percentage of Packers die-hards were sick of him before that?
Anyway, what Rodgers is doing is not remotely the same thing, in my opinion. Rodgers at least has the benefit of seeing how the last situation worked out. He's got a better offense, they brought back Jones, he doesn't want to retire and he's simply trying to pull a Harden because he's always been a _______. I'm not sure how you lose to Tom Brady at home and somehow spin it as being everyone else's fault. If I were the Packers, I'd wait him out so he had to explain himself publicly. There's no version of an explanation that makes him look good. At least Brett had a messy breakup that started with him trying to come back to play for the GREEN BAY PACKERS.
Oh, **** Favre and what he did too.
There, the universe is restored.
Sent from my moto g(7) power using RealGM mobile app
FAH1223 wrote: